Use of a CT statistical deformation model for multi-modal pelvic bone segmentation

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6914, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Thompson, Steve ^a   Penney, Graeme ^b   Buie, Damien ^a   Dasgupta, Prokar ^c   Hawkes, Dave ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Image guidance; MRI; Multi modal; Registration; Segmentation; Shape model

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DEFORMATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS; SURGERY;

IMAGE GUIDANCE; PELVIC SURGERY; SHAPE MODELS;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 43449138510     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.770254     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. L. Adhami and E. Coste-ManiEre, “Optimal planning for minimally invasive surgical robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 19, pp. 854–863, Oct. 2003.
2. W. Shao, R. Wu, K. V. Ling, C. H. Thng, H. S. S. Ho, C. W. S. Cheng, and W. S. Ng, “,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, R. Larsen, M. Nielsen, and J. Sporring, eds., LNCS 4191, pp. 742–749, Springer, 2006.
3. D. Barratt, G. Penney, C. Chan, M. Slomczykowski, T. Carter, P. Edwards, and D. Hawkes, “Self-calibrating 3D-ultrasound-based bone registration for minimally invasive orthopedic surgery,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 25, pp. 312–323, March 2006.
4. T. Kapur, P. Beardsley, S. Gibson, W. Grimson, and W. Wells, “Model-based segmentation of clinical knee MRI,” in IEEE Int’l Workshop on Model-Based 3D Image Analysis, pp. 97–106, 1998.
5. A. Tsai, W. Wells, C. Tempany, E. Grimson, and A. Willsky, “Mutual information in coupled multi-shape model for medical image segmentation.,” Medical Image Analysis 8, pp. 429–445, Dec 2004.
6. D. Shen and C. Davatzikos, “Adaptive-focus statistical shape model for segmentation of 3D MR structures,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, S. L. Delp, A. M. DiGioia, and B. Jaramaz, eds., LNCS 1935, pp. 206–215, Springer, 2000.
7. M. Strzelecki, “Texture boundary detection using network of synchronised oscillators,” Electronics Letters 40 (8), pp. 466–467, 2004.
8. J. Carballido-Gamio, S. Belongie, and S. Majumdar, “Normalized cuts in 3-D for spinal MRI segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 23, pp. 36–44, Jan. 2004.
9. L. M. Lorigo, O. Faugeras, W. E. L. Grimson, R. Keriven, and R. Kikinis, “Segmentation of bone in clinical knee MRI using texture-based geodesic active contours,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, W. M. Wells, A. C. F. Colchester, and S. L. Delp, eds., LNCS 1496, pp. 1195–1204, Springer, 1998.
10. C. L. Hoad and A. L. Martel, “Segmentation of MR images for computer-assisted surgery of the lumbar spine,” Physics in Medicine and Biology 47, no 19, pp. 3503–3517, 2002.
11. T. F. Cootes and C. J. Taylor, “Anatomical statistical models and their role in feature extraction,” British Journal of Radiology 77(2), pp. S133–S139(1), 2004.
12. H. Lamecker, M. Seebass, H. C. Hege, and P. Deuflhard, “A 3D statistical shape model of the pelvic bone for segmentation,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging 2004: Image Processing., J. M. Fitzpatrick and M. Sonka, eds., 5370, pp. 1341–1351, May 2004.
13. J. Yao and R. H. Taylor, “Non-rigid registration and correspondence finding in medical image analysis using multiple-layer flexible mesh template matching.,” International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 17(7), pp. 1145–1165, 2003.
14. C. Chan, D. Barratt, P. Edwards, G. Penney, M. Slomczykowski, T. Carter, and D. Hawkes, “Cadaver validation of the use of ultrasound for 3D model instantiation of bony anatomy in image guided orthopaedic surgery,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, 3217, pp. 397–404, 2004.
15. G. Heitz, T. Rohlfing, and C. R. Maurer, Jr., “Statistical shape model generation using nonrigid deformation of a template mesh,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging 2005: Image Processing, J. M. Fitzpatrick and J. M. Reinhardt, eds., 5747, pp. 1411–1421, Apr. 2005
16. D. Rueckert, L. I. Sonoda, C. Hayes, D. L. G. Hill, and M. O. Leach, “Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18, pp. 712–721, Aug. 1999.
17. W. R. Crum, C. Tanner, and D. J. Hawkes, “Anisotropic multi-scale fluid registration: evaluation in magnetic resonance breast imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology 50, pp. 5153–5174, 2005.
18. K. Price, R. Storn, and J. Lampinen, Differential Evolution - A Practical Approach to Global Optimization, Springer, ISBN: 3-540-20950-6, 2005.
19. E. B. van de Kraats, G. P. Penney, T. van Walsum, and W. J. Niessen, “Multispectral MR to X-ray registration of vertebral bodies by generating CT-like data.,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, J. S. Duncan and G. Gerig, eds., LNCS 3750, pp. 911–918, Springer, 2005.