Deciding whether to engage the public on health care issues

Healthcare Management Forum

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 24-28

  Chafe, Roger ^a   Neville, Doreen ^b   Rathwell, Thomas ^c   Deber, Raisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Memorial University

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CONSUMER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; ROLE PLAYING; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; ROLE;

EID: 58849117087     PISSN: 08404704     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60271-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Gray R., Fitch M., Greenberg M., and Shapiro S. Consumer participation in cancer system planning. Journal of Palliative Care 11 4 (1995) 27-33
2. Gauvin F.-P., and Abelson J. Primer on public involvement. Prepared for Health Council of Canada; 2006. Available from: www.healthcouncilcanada.ca [Accessed January 31, 2008]
3. Murphy N.J. Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities. Health Expectations 8 2 (2005) 172-181
4. Transparency, participation, and accountability. (Editorial). Canadian HIV/AIDS Policy & Law Review 8 1 (2003) 5-6
5. Maloff B., Bilan D., and Thurston W. Enhancing public input into decision making: Development of the Calgary Regional Health Authority Public Participation Framework. Family & Community Health 23 1 (2000) 66-78
6. Anderson J.M. Empowering patients: Issues and strategies. Social Sciences & Medicine 43 5 (1996) 697-705
7. Higgins J.W. Closer to home: The case for experiential participation in health reform. Canadian Journal of Public Health 90 1 (1999) 30-34
8. Abelson J., and Eyles J. Public participation and citizen governance in the Canadian health system. In: Forest P.-G., McIntosh T., and Marchildon G. (Eds). Changing health care in Canada: The Romanow Papers Volume 2 (2004), University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON 279-311
9. Harrison S., Dowswell G., and Milewa T. Guest editorial: Public and user involvement in the UK National Health Service. Health & Social Care in the Community 10 2 (2002) 63-66
10. Sang B. Choice, participation and accountability: Assessing the potential impact of legislation promoting patient and public involvement in health in the UK. Health Expectations 7 3 (2004) 187-190
11. Litva A., Coast J., Donovan J., Eyles J., Shepherd M., Tacchi J., et al. "The public is too subjective": Public involvement at different levels of healthcare decision making. Social Science & Medicine 54 12 (2002) 1825-1837
12. Abelson J., Forest P.-G., Casebeer A., Mackean G., Maloff B., Musto R., et al. Towards more meaningful, informed and effective public consultation. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2004. Available from: www.chsrf.ca [Accessed January 31, 2008]
13. Zerhouni E. Enhancing public input and transparency in the National Institutes of Health Research priority-setting process (2004), National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives. [Accessed July, 23, 2008] Available from: copr.nih.gov
14. Coulter A., and Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. British Medical Journal 335 (2007) 24-27
15. Coulter A. After Bristol: Putting patients at the centre. Quality and Safety in Healthcare 11 (2002) 186-188
16. Deber R.B., Kraetschmer N., Urowitz S., and Sharpe N. Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expectations 10 3 (2007) 248-258
17. Deber R.B., Kraetschmer N., and Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?. Archives of Internal Medicine 156 13 (1996) 1414-1420
18. Kassirer J.P. Adding insult to injury. Usurping patients' prerogatives. New England Journal of Medicine 308 15 (1983) 898-901
19. Wilson S. Consumer empowerment in the mental health field. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 15 2 (1996) 69-85
20. Ross K. The emergence of stakeholder contributions. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 19 2 (2000) 156-161
21. Abelson J., Lomas J., Eyles J., Birch S., and Veenstra G. Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario. Canadian Medical Association Journal 153 4 (1995) 403-412
22. Rathwell T., Deber R., Kenny N., Nestman L., Neville D., Conrad P., et al. Building a public dialogue framework for defining the medicare basket. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2006. Available from: www.chsrf.ca [Accessed January 31, 2008]
23. Chafe R., Neville D., Rathwell T., Deber R., Kenny N., and Nestman L. Annotated bibliography of Canadian public involvement in health care governance (1980-2007); 2008. Available from: www.dal.ca
24. Veatch R.M. Terri Schiavo, Son Hudson, and 'nonbeneficial' medical treatments. Health Affairs 24 4 (2005) 976-979
25. Lomas J. Reluctant rationers: Public input to health care priorities. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2 2 (1997) 103-111
26. Tritter J., and McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76 2 (2006) 156-168
27. Kenny N. What good is health care? (2002), Canadian Health Association Press
28. Deber R., and Williams A. Policy, payment and participation: Long-term care reform in Ontario. Canadian Journal on Aging 14 2 (1995) 294-318
29. Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35 4 (1969) 216-224
30. Maxwell J., Rosell S., and Forest P.-G. Giving citizens a voice in health care policy in Canada. British Medical Journal 326 (2003) 1031-1033
31. Schattschneider E.E. The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America (1964), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
32. Marmor T., and Morone J. Representing consumer interests: Imbalanced markets, health planning and the HSAs. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Health and Society 58 1 (1980) 125-165
33. Chafe R., Neville D., Rathwell T., Deber R., Kenny K., Nestman L., et al. A framework for involving the public in the medicare coverage decisions. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2007. Available from: http://schoolofhealthadministration.dal.ca [Accessed January 31, 2008]