When are two heads better than one? Visual perception and information transfer affect vigilance coordination in foraging groups

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 898-906

  Fernández Juricic, Esteban ^a,c   Kerr, Benjamin ^a   Bednekoff, Peter A ^b   Stephens, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anti predator behavior; Collective detection; Group size; Risk dilution; Scanning; Vision

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; GROUP BEHAVIOR; GROUP SIZE; VIGILANCE; VISION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 8144226478     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh092     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arentz CL, Leger DW, 1997. Artificial visual obstruction, antipredator vigilance, and predator detection in the thirteen-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus). Behaviour 134:1101-1114.
2. Bahr DB, Bekoff M, 1999. Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modeling with cellular automata. Anim Behav 58:831-839.
3. Beauchamp G, 2002. Little evidence for visual monitoring of vigilance in zebra finches. Can J Zool 80:1634-1637.
4. Bednekoff PA, 1997. Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. Am Nat 150:373-392.
5. Bednekoff PA, 2001. Coordination of safe, selfish sentinels based on mutual benefits. Ann Zool Fenn 38:5-14.
6. Bednekoff PA, Lima SL, 1998. Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends Ecol Evol 13:284-287.
7. Bednekoff PA, Lima SL, 2002. Why are scanning patters so variable? An overlooked question in the study of anti-predator vigilance. J Avian Biol 33:143-149.
8. Bednekoff PA, Woolfenden GW, 2003. Florida scrub-jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are sentinels more when well-fed (even with no kin nearby). Ethology 110:895-904.
9. Bekoff M, 1995. Vigilance, flock size, and flock geometry: information gathering by Western Evening Grossbeaks (Aves, Fringillidae). Ethology 99:150-161.
10. Bertram BCR, 1980. Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Anim Behav 28:278-286.
11. Elcavage P, Caraco T, 1983. Vigilance behaviour in house sparrow flocks. Anim Behav 31:303-312.
12. Fernández GJ, Capurro AF, Reboreda JC, 2003. Effect of group size on individual and collective vigilance in Greater Rheas. Ethology 109:413-425.
13. Fernández-Juricic E, Kacelnik A, 2004. Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quality and quantity of information at different neighbour distances. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:502-511.
14. Fernández-Juricic E, Erichsen JT, Kacelnik A, 2004a. Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 19:25-31.
15. Fernández-Juricic E, Siller S, Kacelnik A, 2004b. Flock density, social foraging and scanning: an experiment with starlings. Behav Ecol 15:371-379.
16. Fernández-Juricic E, Smith R, Kacelnik A, in press. Increasing the costs of conspecific scanning in socially foraging starlings affects vigilance and foraging behaviour. Anim Behav.
17. Ferriere R, Cazelles B, Cezilly F, Desportes J-P, 1999. Predictability, chaos and coordination in bird vigilant behaviour. Anim Behav 57:497-500.
18. Guillemain M, Duncan P, Fritz H, 2001. Switching to a feeding method that obstructs vision increases head-up vigilance in dabbling ducks. J Avian Biol 32:345-350.
19. Guillemain M, Martin G, Fritz H, 2002. Feeding methods, visual fields and vigilance in dabbling ducks. Funct Ecol 16:522-529.
20. Hart A, Lendrem DW, 1984. Vigilance and scanning patterns in birds. Anim Behav 32:1216-1224.
21. Hilton GM, Cresswell W, Ruxton GD, 1999. Intraflock variation in the speed of escape-flight response on attack by an avian predator. Behav Ecol 10:391-395.
22. Hodos W, Erichsen JT, 1990. Lower-field myopia in birds: an adaptation that keeps the ground in focus. Vision Res 30:653-657.
23. Lendrem DW, Stretch D, Metcalfe N, Jones P, 1986. Scanning for predators in the purple sandpiper; a time-dependent or time-independent process. Anim Behav 34:1577-1578.
24. Lima SL, 1994. Collective detection of predatory attack by birds in the absence of alarm signals. J Avian Biol 25:319-326.
25. Lima SL, 1995a. Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group size effect. Anim Behav 49:11-20.
26. Lima SL, 1995b. Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: fraught with ambiguity? Anim Behav 50:1097-1108.
27. Lima SL, Bednekoff PA, 1999. Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? Anim Behav 58:537-543.
28. Lima SL, Zollner PA, 1996. Anti-predatory vigilance and the limits of collective detection: visual and spatial separation between foragers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:355-363.
29. Lipetz VF, Bekoff M, 1982. Group size and vigilance in Pronghorns. Z fuer Tierpsychologie 69:250-253.
30. Martin FR, Katzir G, 1999. Visual fields in short-toed eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds. Brain Behav Evol 53:55-66.
31. Proctor CJ, Broom M, Ruxton GD, 2001. Modeling antipredator vigilance and flight response in group foragers when warning signals are ambiguous. J Theor Biol 211:409-417.
32. Pulliam HR, Pyke GH, Caraco T, 1982. The scanning behavior of juncos: a game theoretical approach. J Theor Biol 95:89-103.
33. Rasa OAE, 1986. Coordinated vigilance in dwarf mongoose family groups: the 'Watchman's Song' hypothesis and the costs of guarding. Ethology 71:340-344.
34. Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Vásquez RA, 2002. Evolutionary stability of vigilance coordination among social foragers. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1803-1810.
35. Ruxton GD, Roberts G, 1999. Are vigilance sequences a consequence of intrinsic chaos or external changes? Anim Behav 57:493-495.
36. Scannell J, Roberts G, Lazarus J, 2001. Prey scan at random to evade observant predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:541-547.
37. Stankowich T, 2003. Marginal predation methodologies and the importance of predator preferences. Anim Behav 66:589-599.
38. Treves A, 2000. Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggression. Anim Behav 60:711-722.
39. Ward P, 1985. Why birds in flocks do not coordinate their vigilance periods. J Theor Biol 114:383-385.
40. Ydenberg RC, 1998. Behavioral decisions about foraging and predator avoidance. In: Cognitive ecology: the evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making (Dukas R, ed). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 343-378.