A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks

Nature

Volumn 457, Issue 7228, 2009, Pages 463-466

  Saavedra, Serguei ^a,b   Reed Tsochas, Felix ^b   Uzzi, Brian ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; CONSUMER-RESOURCE INTERACTION; FOOD WEB; MODEL TEST; MUTUALISM; NESTEDNESS; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; POLLINATION; SPECIES RICHNESS; STOCHASTICITY;

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; COOPERATION; ECOLOGY; FEEDING; FOOD WEB; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PARAMETER; PLANT; POLLINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES RICHNESS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; SYMBIOSIS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; SYMBIOSIS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 58749106933     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature07532     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404, 180-183 (2000).
2. Cattin, M. F., Bersier, L. F., Banasek-Richter, C., Baltensperger, R. & Gabriel, J. P. Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure. Nature 427, 835-839 (2004).
3. Stouffer, D. B., Camacho, J., Guimerà, R., Ng, C. A. & Nunes Amaral, L. A. Quantitative patterns in the structure of model and empirical food webs. Ecology 86, 1301-1311 (2005).
4. Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., Martinez, N. D., Wood, R. A. & Erwin, D. H. Compilation and network analyses of Cambrian food webs. PLoS Biol. 6, 693-708 (2008).
5. Petchey, O. L., Beckerman, A. P., Riede, J. O. & Warren, P. H. Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4191-4196 (2008).
6. Allesina, S., Alonso, D. & Pascual, M. A general model for food web structure. Science 320, 658-661 (2008).
7. Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. in Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs (eds Pascual, M. & Dunne, J. A.) 143-159 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
8. Jordano, P., Bascompte, J. & Olesen, J. M. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecol. Lett. 6, 69-81 (2003).
9. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J. & Olesen, J. M. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9383-9387 (2003).
10. Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L. & Jordano, P. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19891-19896 (2007).
11. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W. & Earls, F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277, 918-924 (1997).
12. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B. & Policansky, D. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science 284, 278-282 (1999).
13. Hammerstein, P. (ed.) Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation (MIT Press, 2003).
14. Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E. & Nowak, M. A. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441, 502-505 (2006).
15. Bronstein, J. L. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol. Lett. 4, 277-287 (2001).
16. Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. & Ollerton, J. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77, 1043-1060 (1996).
17. Noë, R. & Hammerstein, P. Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, 1-11 (1994).
18. Olesen, J. M. & Jordano, P. Geographic patterns in plant-pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83, 2416-2424 (2002).
19. Guimarães, P. R., Rico-Gray, V., Furtado dos Reis, S. & Thompson, J. N. Asymmetries in specialization in ant-plant mutualistic networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 2041-2047 (2006).
20. Rezende, E. L., Lavabre, J. E., Guimarães, P. R., Jordano, P. & Bascompte, J. Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 448, 925-928 (2007).
21. Santamaría, L. & Rodríguez-Gironés, A. Linkage rules for plant-pollinator networks: Trait complementarity or exploitation barriers? PLoS Biol. 5, 354-362 (2007).
22. Guimarães, P. R. Jr et al. Building-up mechanisms determining the topology of mutualistic networks. J. Theor. Biol. 249, 181-189 (2007).
23. Uzzi, B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61, 674-698 (1996).
24. Carroll, G. R. & Hannan, M. T. The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton Univ. Press, 2004).
25. Podolny, J. M. Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton Univ. Press, 2005).
26. Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M. & Stanley, H. E. Classes of small-world networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11149-11152 (2000).
27. Moody, J. & White, D. R. Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68, 103-127 (2003).
28. Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. & Santamaría, L. A new algorithm to calculate the nestedness temperature of presence-absence matrices. J. Biogeography 33, 924-935 (2006).
29. Girvan, M. & Newman, M. E. J. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7821-7826 (2002).
30. Guimerà, R. & Nunes Amaral, L. A. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433, 895-900 (2005).