Intention-to-treat analysis in cluster randomized trials with noncompliance

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 27, 2008, Pages 5565-5577

  Jo, Booil ^a   Asparouhov, Tihomir ^b   Muthén, Bengt O ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Muthen and Muthen   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster randomized trials; Compliance intraclass correlation; Intention to treat effect; Multilevel mixture analysis; Noncompliance; Outcome intraclass correlation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CHILD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PARENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALGORITHMS; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTENTION; LOGISTIC MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PARENTS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58749106280     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3370     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Dexter P, Wolinsky F, Gramelspacher G, Zhou XH, Eckert G, Waisburd M, Tierney W. Effectiveness of computergenerated reminders for increasing discussions about advance directives and completion of advance directives. Annals of Internal Medicine 1998; 128:102-110.
2. Ialongo NS, Werthamer L, Kellam SG, Brown CH, Wang S, Lin Y. Proximal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on the early risk behaviors for later substance abuse, depression and antisocial behavior. American Journal of Community Psychology 1999; 27:599-642.
3. Sobel ME. What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate: causal inference in the face of interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2006; 101:1398-1407.
4. Aitkin M, Longford N. Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1986; 149:1-43.
5. Goldstein H. Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrika 1986; 73:43-56.
6. Liang KH, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73:13-22.
7. McCulloch CE. Maximum likelihood algorithms for generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997; 92:162-170.
8. Muthén BO, Satorra A. Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. In Sociological Methodology, Marsden PV (ed.). Blackwell: Cambridge, MA, 1995; 267-316.
9. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.
10. Donner A, Klar N. Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1996; 49:435-439.
11. Murray DM. Design and Analysis of Group-randomized Trials. Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.
12. Frangakis CE, Rubin DB, Zhou XH. Clustered encouragement design with individual noncompliance: Bayesian inference and application to advance directive forms. Biostatistics 2002; 3:147-164.
13. Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996; 91:444-455.
14. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley: New York, 1990.
15. Commenges D, Jacqmin H. The intraclass correlation coefficient: distribution-free definition and test. Biometrics 1994; 50:517-526.
16. 2, when used as a test of homogeneity, when expectations are small. Biometrika 1940; 31:346-355.
17. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall: London, 1989.
18. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1999.
19. McKelvey RD, Zavoina W. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1975; 4:103-120.
20. Rubin DB. Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Annals of Statistics 1978; 6:34-58.
21. Rubin DB. Discussion of 'Randomization analysis of experimental data in the Fisher randomization test', Basu D (ed.). Journal of the American Statistical Association 1980; 75:591-593.
22. Rubin DB. Comment on 'Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies'. Statistical Science 1990; 5:472-480.
23. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1977; 39:1-38.
24. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley: New York, 2002.
25. McLachlan GJ, Krishnan T. The EM Algorithm and Extensions. Wiley: New York, 1997.
26. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, 1998-2008.
27. Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with non-compliance. The Annals of Statistics 1997; 25:305-327.
28. Little RJA, Yau LHY. Statistical techniques for analyzing data from prevention trials: treatment of no-shows using Rubin's causal model. Psychological Methods 1998; 3:147-159.
29. Jo B. Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of interventions with noncompliance. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21:3161-3181.
30. Hirano K, Imbens GW, Rubin DB, Zhou XH. Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. Biostatistics 2000; 1:69-88.
31. Jo B. Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: alternative model specifications. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 2002; 27:385-409.
32. Jo B, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO, Ialongo NS, Brown CH. Cluster randomized trials with treatment noncompliance. Psychological Methods 2008; 13:1-18.
33. Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Multilevel mixture models. In Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models, Hancock GR, Samuelsen KM (eds). Information Age Publishing: Greenwich, CT, 2007.
34. Muthén BO. Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, Kaplan D (ed.). Sage: Newbury Park, CA, 2004; 345-368.
35. Muthén BO, Asparouhov T. Growth mixture modeling: analysis with non-Gaussian random effects. In Longitudinal Data Analysis, Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (eds). Chapman & Hall: London, 2008.
36. Jo B. Statistical power in randomized intervention studies with noncompliance. Psychological Methods 2002; 7:178-193.
37. Frangakis CE, Rubin DB. Addressing complications of intent-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika 1999; 86:365-379.