The role of teacher's corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners' writing accuracy over time: Is learner's mother tongue relevant?

Reading and Writing

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 219-243

  Rahimi, Mohammad ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Complexity; Correction; Error feedback; Mother tongue; Writing accuracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 58649107316     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-008-9139-5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. T Ashwell 2000 Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language writing 9 227 258
2. Bialystok, E. (1994). Representation and ways of knowing: Three issues in second language acquisition. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Explicit and implicit leaning of languages (pp. 549-569). London: Academic Press.
3. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. J Bitchener S Young D Cameron 2005 The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing Journal of Second Language Writing 14 191 205
5. S Carroll M Swain 1993 Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalization Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 357 386
6. Chandler, J. (2000). The efficacy of error correction for improvement in the accuracy of L2 student writing. Paper presented at the AAAL Conference, Vancouver, BC.
7. J Chandler 2003 The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing Journal of Second Language Writing 12 267 296
8. Cook, V. (1991). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
9. Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Ellis, N. (1994). Implicit and explicit processes in language acquisition: An introduction. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and Explicit learning of languages (pp. 1-32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Fallahi, M. (1991). Contrastive linguistics and linguistics and analysis of errors: The grammatical structure of English and Persian. Tehran, Iran: Iran University Press.
12. Fathman, A., & Whally, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. LL Fazio 2001 The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students Journal of Second Language Writing 10 235 249
14. DR Ferris 1999 The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A response to Truscott (1996) Journal of Second Language Writing 8 1 10
15. DR Ferris 2004 The "Grammar Correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?) Journal of Second Language Writing 13 49 62
16. Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. DR Ferris B Roberts 2001 Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 8 161 184
18. P Foster P Skehan 1996 The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 299 324
19. D Frantzen 1995 The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course Modern Language Journal 79 329 344
20. JM Goldschneider RM Dekeyser 2001 Explaining the "natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants Language Learning 51 1 50
21. D Guènette 2007 Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing Journal of Second Language Writing 16 40 53
22. G Havranek 2002 When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research 37 255 270
23. C. G. Kepner 1990 An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills Modern Language Journal 75 305 313
24. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. JF Lalande 1982 Reducing composition errors: An experiment Modern Language Journal 66 140 149
26. D Larsen-Freeman 2006 The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English Applied Linguistics 27 590 619
27. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. R Lyster 2004 Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 399 432
29. H Nassaji M Swain 2000 A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles Language Awareness 9 34 51
30. T Pica 2000 Tradition and transition in English language teaching methodology System 28 1 18
31. C Polio N Fleck N Leder 1998 "If only I had more time": ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions Journal of Second Language Writing 7 43 68
32. Prabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Rahimian, J. (1995). Clause types and other aspects of clause structure in Persian: A study oriented towards comparison with English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia.
34. Reber, A. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
35. T Robb S Ross I Shortreed 1986 Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality TESOL Quarterly 20 83 93
36. H. Semke 1984 The effect of the red pen Foreign Language Annals 17 195 202
37. RW Schmidt 1990 The role of consciousness in second language learning Applied Linguistics 11 129 158
38. RW Schmidt 1993 Awareness and second language acquisition Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13 206 226
39. Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. B Schwartz 1993 Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 147 163
41. K Sheppard 1992 Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal 23 103 110
42. Stern, H. H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 93-109). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44. J Truscott 1996 The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes Language Learning 46 327 369
45. J Truscott 1999 The case for "the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes": A response to Ferris Journal of Second Language Writing 8 111 122
46. J Truscott 2004 Evidence and conjecture on the effect of correction: A response to Chandler Journal of Second Language Writing 12 96 104
47. J Truscott 2007 The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately Journal of Second Language Writing 16 255 272
48. Yarmohammadi, L. (1996). A contrastive analysis of Persian and English: Grammar, vocabulary, and phonology. Tehran, Iran: Pyame Noor University.
49. F Yuan R Ellis 2003 The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production Applied Linguistics 24 1 27