A new mathematical equation relating activation energy to bond angle and distance: A key for understanding the role of acceleration in lactonization of the trimethyl lock system

Bioorganic Chemistry

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 11-25

  Karaman, Rafik ^a  

^a AL QUDS UNIVERSITY   (Palestine)

Author keywords

Hydroxy acids; Lactonization; Proximity orientation; Stereopopulation control; Steric effects; Tri methyl effect

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; ETHER; HYDROXYACID; HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; HYDROXYL GROUP; LACTONE DERIVATIVE; OXYGEN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CYCLIZATION; ENERGY; KINETICS; LACTONIZATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON TRANSPORT; THERMODYNAMICS;

ALGORITHMS; CARBON; CATALYSIS; CINNAMATES; ENERGY TRANSFER; HYDROXY ACIDS; LACTONES; MATHEMATICS; METHANE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OXYGEN; PROTONS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 58549095423     PISSN: 00452068     EISSN: 10902120     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2008.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Bruice T.C., and Benkovic S.J. Bioorganic Mechanisms vols. 1 and 2 (1966), Benjamin, Reading, MA
2. Jencks W.P. Catalysis in Chemistry and Enzymology (1969), McGraw, New York
3. Bender M.L. Mechanism of Homogeneous Catalysis from Protons to Proteins (1971), Wiley Interscience, New York
4. Blow D.M., Birktoff J.J., and Hartly B.S. Nature (London) 221 (1969) 337
5. L Bender M., and Kezdy F.J. J. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 34 (1965) 49
6. M.I. Page (Ed.) The Chemistry of Enzyme Action, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.
7. In: Gandour R.D., and Schowen R.L. (Eds). Transition States of Biochemical Processes (1978), Plenum Press, New York
8. Chipman D.M., and Sharon N. Science 165 (1969) 454
9. Kirby A.J. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 22 (1987) 283
10. Nelson D.L., and Cox M.M. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry (2003), Worth Publishers, New York
11. Fersht A. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding (1999), W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
12. Bruice T.C., and Lightstone F.L. Acc. Chem. Res 32 (1999) 127
13. Lightstone F.L., and Bruice T.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (1997) 9103
14. Lightstone F.L., and Bruice T.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 2595
15. Lightstone F.L., and Bruice T.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 10789
16. Bruice T.C., and Bradbury W.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 3803
17. Bruice T.C., and Bradbury W.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87 (1965) 4846
18. Bruice T.C., and Pandit U.K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82 (1960) 5858
19. Bruice T.C., and Pandit U.K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 46 (1960) 402
20. Milstein S., and Cohen L.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92 (1970) 4377
21. Milstein S., and Cohen L.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 67 (1970) 1143
22. Milstein S., and Cohen L.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 9158
23. Borchardt R.T., and Cohen L.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 9166
24. Borchardt R.T., and Cohen L.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 94 (1972) 9175
25. Borchardt R.T., and Cohen L.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 8308
26. Borchardt R.T., and Cohen L.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 8313
27. King M.M., and Cohen L.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) 2752
28. Hillery P.S., and Cohen L.A. J. Org. Chem. 48 (1983) 3465
29. Menger F.M. Acc. Chem. Res. 18 (1985) 128
30. Menger F.M., Chow J.F., Kaiserman H., and Vascquez P.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) 4996
31. Menger F.M. Tetrahedron 39 (1983) 1013
32. Menger F.M., Grosssman J., and Liotta D.C. J. Org. Chem. 48 (1983) 905
33. Menger F.M., Galloway A.L., and Musaev D.G. Chem. Comm. (2003) 2370
34. Menger F.M. Pure Appl. Chem. 77 (2005) 1873 and references therein
35. Dafforn A., and Koshland Jr. D.E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68 (1971) 2463
36. Dafforn A., and Koshland Jr. D.E. Bioorg. Chem. 1 (1971) 129
37. Dafforn A., and Koshland Jr. D.E. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 52 (1973) 779
38. Storm D.R., and Koshland Jr. D.E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 66 (1970) 445
39. Storm D.R., and Koshland Jr. D.E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 5805
40. Storm D.R., and Koshland Jr. D.E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 5815
41. Winans R.E., and Wilcox Jr. C.F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 4281
42. Dorigo A.E., and Houk K.N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109 (1987) 3698
43. Houk K.N., Tucker J.A., and Dorigo A.E. Acc. Chem. Res. 23 (1990) 107
44. Danforth C., Nicholson A.W., James J.C., and Loudon G.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 4275
45. R. Karaman, Presented in part at the First International Conference on Drug Design and Discovery in Dubai, UAE, February 4-7, 2008
46. Karaman R. Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008) 5998
47. R. Karaman, Tetrahedron Lett., accepted for publication.
48. For recent reviews, see. Shan D., Nicholaou M.G., Borchardt R.D., and Wang B.J. J. Pharm. Sci. 86 (1997) 765
49. Testa B., and Mayer J.M. Drug Metab. Rev. 30 (1998) 787
50. Wang W., Jiang J., Ballard C.E., and Wang B. Curr. Pharm. Des. 5 (1999) 265
51. Amsberry K.L., Gerstenberger A.E., and Borchardt R.D. Pharm. Res. 8 (1991) 455
52. Ueda Y., Mikkilineni A.B., Knipe J.O., Rose W.C., Casazza A.M., and Vyas D.M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 3 (1993) 1761
53. Ueda Y., Matiskella J.D., Mikkilineni A.B., Knipe J.O., Rose W.C., Casazza A.M., and Vyas D.M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 5 (1995) 247
54. Available from: .
55. Burker U., and Allinger N.L. Molecular Mechanics (1982), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
56. Casewit C.J., Colwell K.S., and Rappe' A.K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10024
57. Casewit C.J., Colwell K.S., and Rappe' A.K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10035
58. Casewit C.J., Colwell K.S., and Rappe' A.K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10046
59. Rappe' A.K., and Goddard W.A. J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 3358
60. Rappe' A.K., Colwell K.S., and Casewit C.J. Inorg. Chem. 32 (1993) 3438
61. Dewar M.J.S., Zoebisch E.G., Healy E.F., and Stewart J.J.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 3902
62. Dewar M.J.S., Ford G.P., McKee M.L., Rzepa H.S., Thoel W., and Yamaguchi Y. J. Mol. Struct. 43 (1978) 135
63. Murrell J.N., and Laidler K.J. Trans. Faraday Soc. 64 (1968) 371
64. Goldblum A., and Loew G.H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 4265
65. Muller K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 19 (1980) 1
66. Dewar M.J.S., and Kirschner S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93 (1971) 4290
67. Karle J.M., and Karle I.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 9182
68. Li Y.Z., and Schuster G.B. J. Org. Chem. 53 (1988) 1273 and references cited therein
69. Dewar M.J.S., Fox M.A., Campbell K.A., Chen C.-C., Friedlheim J.E., Holloway M.K., Kim S.C., Liecheski P.B., Pakiari A., Tien T.-P., and Zoebisch E.G. J. Comp. Chem. 5 (1984) 480
70. Dewar M.J.S., and Rzepa H.Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 (1978) 784
71. Karaman R., Huang J.-T.L., and Fry J.L. J. Comp. Chem. 11 (1990) 1009
72. Karaman R., Huang J.-T.L., and Fry J.L. J. Comp. Chem. 12 (1991) 536
73. Karaman R., Huang J.-T.L., and Fry J.L. J. Org. Chem. 56 (1991) 188 and references therein
74. For details of crystal structure analysis, see Ref. [26].
75. For recent review on a gem- dimethyl effect see. Jung M.E., and Plizzi G. Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 1735
76. Ingold C.K. Structure and Mechanism in Organic Chemistry. second ed. (1969), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
77. Newman M.S. Steric Effects in Organic Chemistry (1956), Wiley, New York
78. Streitweiser Jr. A., and Heathcock C.H. Introduction to Organic Chemistry. third ed. (1985), MacMillan, New York
79. Czarink A.W. In: Liebman J.F., and Greenberg A. (Eds). Mechanistic Principles of Enzyme Activity (1988), VCH pulishers, New York, NY
80. A reaction method was used to calculate the enthalpic and entropic changes in the second step in the approach of the phenolic oxygen onto the carboxylic carbon. A distance of O10-C1 was decreased in increments of 0.1 Å and was kept constant while full optimization of other parameters was calculated. The monitoring results clearly indicate that the change in entropy along the reaction pathway is negligible and that the change in free energy is mainly composed of enthalpic forces.
81. A rotation of the carboxylic moiety around C2-C3 bond in 1a and 1c was conducted using a reaction coordinate method. This was accomplished by changing the dihedral angle O10C1C2C3 in increments of 36° while keeping the C1-O10 distance constant (2.0, 1.9 or 1.8 Å). The calculations indicate a higher barrier of rotation for 1a over 1c.