Highway-induced development research results for metropolitan areas

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2067, 2008, Pages 101-109

  Ewing, Reid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

'CURRENT; DECENTRALISATION; GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT; HIGHWAY INVESTMENT; INDUCED TRAFFICS; LOWER DENSITY; METROPOLITAN AREA; NET EFFECT; RESEARCH RESULTS; ZERO-SUM GAME;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 58449113331     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2067-12     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Widen the Roads, Drivers Will Come -MD's I-270 Offers a Lesson. Washington Post, Jan. 4, 1999, p. B1.
2. Special Report 245: Expanding Metropolitan Highways: Implications for Air Quality and Energy Use. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.
3. Litman, T. Generated Traffic: Implications for Transport Planning. ITE Journal, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2001, pp. 38-47.
4. Cervero, R. Induced Travel Demand: Research Design, Empirical Evidence, and Normative Policies. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2002, pp. 3-20.
5. Noland, R. B., and L. Lem. A Review of the Evidence for Induced Travel and Changes in Transportation and Environmental Policy in the US and the UK. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 7, 2002, pp. 1-26.
6. Mohring, H. Land Values and the Measurement of Highway Benefits. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79, 1961, pp. 236-249.
7. Czamanski, S. Effects of Public Investments on Urban Land Values. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 32, 1966, pp. 204-217.
8. Corsi, T. M. A Multivariate Analysis of Land Use Change: Ohio Turnpike Interchanges. Land Economics, Vol. 50, 1974, pp. 232-241.
9. Giuliano, G. The Weakening Transportation-Land Use Connection. Access, Vol. 6, 1995, pp. 3-11.
10. Cervero, R., and I. Landis. The Transportation-Land Use Connection Still Matters. Access, Vol. 7, 1995, pp. 2-10.
11. Boarnet, M. G. Highways and Economic Productivity: Interpreting Recent Evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1997, pp. 476-486.
12. Bhatta, S. D., and M. P. Drennan. The Economic Benefits of Public Investment in Transportation: A Review of Recent Literature. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2003, pp. 288-296.
13. Garcia-Mila, T., T. J. McGuire, and R. H. Porter. The Effect of Public Capital in State-Level Production Functions Reconsidered. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 78, 1996, pp. 177-180.
14. Haughwout, A. F. State Infrastructure and the Geography of Employment. Growth and Change, Vol. 30, 1999, pp. 549-566.
15. Lichter, D. T., and G. V. Fuguitt. Demographic Response to Transportation. Innovation: The Case of the Interstate Highway. Social Forces, Vol. 59, No. 2, 1980, pp. 492-512.
16. Payne-Maxie Consultants. The Land Use and Urban Development Impacts of Beltways. Final Report for U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1980.
17. Stephanedes, Y. J., and D. M. Eagle. Highway Impacts on Regional Employment. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 21, 1987, pp. 68-79.
18. Carlino, G. A., and E. S. Mills. The Determinants of County Growth. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 27, 1987, pp. 39-54.
19. Rephann, T., and A. Isserman. New Highways as Economic Development Tools: An Evaluation Using Quasi-Experimental. Matching Methods. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 24, 1994, pp. 723-751.
20. Boarnet, M. G. Spillovers and Locational Effects of Public Infrastructure. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1998, pp. 381-400.
21. Hansen, M., D. Gillen, and M. Puvathingal. Freeway Expansion and Land Development: An Empirical Analysis of Transportation Corridors. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
22. Voith, R. Transportation Investments in the Philudelphia Metropolitan Area: Who Benefits? Who Pays? and What Are the Consequences? Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa., 1998.
23. Boarnet, M. G., and S. Chalermpong. New Highways, Urban Development, and Induced Travel. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine, 2000.
24. Kockelman, K. M., B. ten Siethoff, C. M. Walton, and H. S. Mahmassani. Research on Relationships Between Transportation Infrastructure and Increuses in Vehicle Miles Traveled: The Effects of Highway Capacity Expansion on Land Development. Final Technical. Report for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
25. Bollinger, C. R., and K. R. Ihlanfeldt. The Intraurban Spatial Distribution of Employment: Which Government Interventions Make a Difference? Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2003, pp. 396-412.
26. Cervero, R. Road Expansion, Urban Growth, and Induced Travel: A Path Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2003, pp. 145-163.
27. Hartgen, D. T. Highwuys and Sprawl in North Carolina. John Locke Foundation, Raleigh, N.C., 2003.
28. Sanchez, T. W. Land Use and Growth Impacts from Highway Capacity Increases. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 130, No. 2, 2004, pp. 75-82.
29. Ryan, S. The Value of Access to Highways and Light Rail Transit: Evidence for Industrial and Office Firms. Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2005, pp. 751-764.
30. Berechman, J., D. Ozmen, and K. Ozbay. Empirical Analysis of Transportation Investment and Economic Development at State, County and Municipality Levels. Transportation, Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 537-551.
31. Jiwattanakulpaisarn, P., R. B. Noland, D. J. Graham, and J. W. Polak. Do Roudway Expansions Contribute Towards County Employment Growth? Evidence from North Curolinu. Universities' Transport Study Group, Dublin, Ireland, 2006.