Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Hospedales, Timothy ^a   Vijayakumar, Sethu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; SENSORY STIMULATION; SENSORY SYSTEM; SIGNAL DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PERCEPTION;

EID: 58449102723     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004205     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A (2004) Object perception as bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 271-304.
2. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M (1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res 35: 389-412.
3. Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14(3): 257-262.
4. Battaglia PW, Jacobs RA, Aslin RN (2003) Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 20(7): 1391-1397.
5. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433.
6. Gepshtein S, Banks MS (2003) Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Curr Biol 13(6): 483-488.
7. Hillis JM, Watt SJ, Landy MS, Banks MS (2004) Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. J Vis 4(12): 967-992.
8. Knill DC, Saunders JA (2003) Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Res 43(24): 2539-2558.
9. Jacobs RA (1999) Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Res 39(21): 3621-3629.
10. Hospedales T, Cartwright J, Vijayakumar S (2007) Structure inference for Bayesian multisensory perception and tracking. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2007.
11. Hospedales T, Vijayakumar S (2008) Structure inference for Bayesian multisensory scene understanding. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30(12): 2140-2157.
12. Hairston WD, Wallace MT, Vaughan JW, Stein BE, Norris JL, et al. (2003) Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias. J Cogn Neurosci 15(1): 20-29.
13. Wallace MT, Roberson GE, Hairston WD, Stein BE, Vaughan JW, et al. (2004) Unifying multisensory signals across time and space. Exp Brain Res 158(2): 252-258.
14. Shams L, Ma WJ, Beierholm U (2005) Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept. Neuroreport 16(17): 1923-1927.
15. Kording KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum, et al. (2007) Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE 2(9): e943.
16. Sato Y, Toyoizumi T, Aihara K (2007) Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect: Identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli. Neural Comput 19(12): 3335-3355.
17. Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS (2002) Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 298(5598): 1627-1630.
18. Kording KP, Wolpert DM (2004) The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(26): 9839-9842.
19. Landy MS, Kojima H (2001) Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18(9): 2307-2320.
20. MacKay D (2003) Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
21. MacKay D (1991) Bayesian interpolation. Neural Computation 4(3): 415-447.
22. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature 408: 788.
23. Ernst MO, Bulthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8(4): 162-169.
24. Knill DC, Richards W, eds (1996) Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge University Press.
25. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection Theory: A User's Guide Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Geiger D, Heckerman D (1996) Knowledge representation and inference in similarity networks and bayesian multinets. Artificial Intelligence 82: 45-74.
27. Bar-Shalom Y, Tse E (1975) Tracking in a cluttered environment with probabilistic data association. Automatica 11: 451-460.
28. Roach NW, Heron J, McGraw PV (2006) Resolving multisensory conflict: a strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration. Proc Biol Sci 273(1598): 2159-2168.
29. Ernst M (2005) Perception of the human body from the inside out, chapter A Bayesian view on multimodal cue integration 105-131, Oxford University Press.
30. Bresciani J.-P, Dammeier F, Ernst MO (2006) Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. J Vis 6(5): 554-564.
31. Ernst MO (2007) Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. Journal of Vision 7: 1-14.
32. Knill DC (2007) Robust cue integration: a bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. J Vis 7(7): 5.1-524.
33. Gepshtein S, Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS (2005) The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity. J Vis 5: 1013-1023.
34. Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27(12): 712-719.
35. Pouget A, Dayan P, Zemel R (2003) Inference and computation with population codes. Annual Review of Neuroscience 26: 381-410.
36. Ma WJ, Beck JM, Latham PE, Pouget A (2006) Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat Neurosci 9(11): 1432-1438.
37. Knill DC (1998) Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: human and ideal observers compared. Vision Res 38(11): 1683-171.