Individual differences in initial low-dose cocaine-induced locomotor activity and locomotor sensitization in adult outbred female Sprague-Dawley rats

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 511-516

  Mandt, Bruce H ^a   Allen, Richard M ^b   Zahniser, Nancy R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Health and Human Physiology   (United States)

Author keywords

Cocaine; Female; Individual differences; Locomotor activity; Male; Rat; Sensitization; Sex differences

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; DOPAMINE TRANSPORTER;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; INDIVIDUALITY; LOCOMOTION; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; OUTBRED STRAIN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSITIZATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; INDIVIDUALITY; INJECTIONS, INTRAPERITONEAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

RATTUS;

EID: 58349112091     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen R.M., Everett C.V., Nelson A.M., Gulley J.M., and Zahniser N.R. Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place preference in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86 (2007) 37-44
2. Becker J.B. Gender differences in dopaminergic function in striatum and nucleus accumbens. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64 (1999) 803-812
3. Becker J.B., Molenda H., and Hummer D.L. Gender differences in the behavioral response to cocaine and amphetamine: implications for mechanisms mediating gender differences in drug abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci 937 (2001) 172-187
4. Briegleb S.K., Gulley J.M., Hoover B.R., and Zahniser N.R. Individual differences in cocaine- and amphetamine-induced activation of male Sprague-Dawley rats: contribution of the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 29 (2004) 2168-2179
5. Carey R.J., DePalma G., and Damianopoulos E. Response to novelty as a predictor of cocaine sensitization and conditioning in rats: a correlational analysis. Psychopharmacology 168 (2003) 245-252
6. Chen R., Tilley M.R., Wei H., Zhou F., Zhou F.M., Ching S., et al. Abolished cocaine reward in mice with a cocaine-insensitive dopamine transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103 (2006) 9333-9338
7. Corda M.G., Piras G., Lecca D., Fernández-Teruel A., Driscoll P., and Giorgi O. The psychogenetically selected Roman rat lines differ in the susceptibility to develop amphetamine sensitization. Behav Brain Res 157 (2005) 147-156
8. Erb S.M., and Parker L.A. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48 (1994) 581-586
9. Festa E.D., Russo S.J., Gazi F.M., Niyomchai T., Kemen L.M., Lin S.N., et al. Sex differences in cocaine-induced behavioral responses, pharmacokinetics, and monoamine levels. Neuropharmacology 46 (2004) 672-687
10. Giorgi O., Piras G., and Corda M.G. The psychogenetically selected Roman high- and low-avoidance rat lines: a model to study individual vulnerability to drug addiction. Neurosci BioBehavioral Rev 31 (2007) 148-163
11. Gong W., Neill D.B., and Justice Jr. J.B. Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53 (1996) 191-196
12. Gulley J.M., Hoover B.R., Larson G.A., and Zahniser N.R. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in rats: behavioral characteristic, cocaine pharmacokinetics, and the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 28 (2003) 2089-2101
13. Hu M., and Becker J.B. Effects of sex and estrogen on behavioral sensitization to cocaine in rats. J Neurosci 23 (2003) 693-699
14. Kamens H.M., Burkhart-Kasch S., McKinnon C.S., Li N., Reed C., and Phillips T.J. Sensitivity to psychostimulants in mice bred for high and low stimulation to methamphetamine. Genes Brain Behavior 4 (2005) 110-125
15. Klebaur J.E., Bevins R.A., Segar T.M., and Bardo M.T. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats. Behav Pharmacol 12 (2001) 267-275
16. Kosten T.R., Kosten T.A., McDougle C.J., Hameedi F.A., McCance E.F., Rosen M.I., et al. Gender differences in response to intranasal cocaine administration in humans. Biol Psychiatry 39 (1996) 147-148
17. Lukas S.E., Sholar M., Lundahl L.H., Lamas X., Kouri E., Wines J.D., et al. Sex differences in plasma cocaine levels and subjective effects after acute cocaine administration in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 125 (1996) 346-354
18. Lynch W.J. Sex differences in vulnerability to drug self-administration. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 14 (2006) 34-41
19. Lynch W.J., and Carroll M.E. Sex differences in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine and heroin in rats. Psychopharmacology 144 (1999) 77-82
20. Lynch W.J., and Carroll M.E. Reinstatement of cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Psychopharmacology 148 (2000) 196-200
21. Lynch W.J., Roth M.E., and Carroll M.E. Biological basis of sex differences in drug abuse: preclinical and clinical studies. Psychopharmacology 164 (2002) 121-137
22. Mandt, B.H., Schenk, S., Zahniser, N.R., Allen, R.M. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in male Sprague-Dawley rats and their acquisition of and motivation to self-administer cocaine. Psychopharmacology; in press (DOI:10.1007/s00213-008-1265-x).
23. Mitchell J.M., Cunningham C.L., and Mark G.P. Locomotor activity predicts acquisition of self-administration behavior but not cocaine intake. Behav Neurosci 119 (2005) 464-472
24. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245 (1989) 1511-1515
25. Pierre P.J., and Vezina P. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology 129 (1997) 277-284
26. Quertemont E., Brabant C., and Tirelli E. Response to novelty as a predictor for drug effects: the pitfalls of some correlational studies. Psychopharmacology 173 (2004) 221-224
27. Robbins S.J., Ehrman R.N., Childress A.R., and O'Brien C.P. Comparing levels of cocaine cue reactivity in male and female outpatients. Drug Alcohol Depend 53 (1999) 223-230
28. Roberts D.C.S., Bennett S.A.L., and Vickers G.J. The estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Psychopharmacology 98 (1989) 408-411
29. Russo S.J., Jenab S., Fabian S.J., Festa E.D., Kemen L.M., and Quinones-Jenab V. Sex differences in the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. Brain Res 970 (2003) 214-220
30. Sabeti J., Gerhardt G.A., and Zahniser N.R. Acute cocaine differentially alters accumbens and striatal dopamine clearance in low and high cocaine locomotor responders: behavioral and electrochemical recordings in freely moving rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302 (2002) 1201-1211
31. Sabeti J., Gerhardt G.A., and Zahniser N.R. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in low and high cocaine locomotor-responding rats are associated with differential inhibition of dopamine clearance in nucleus accumbens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305 (2003) 180-190
32. Sell S.L., Scalzitti J.M., Thomas M.L., and Cunningham K.A. Influence of ovarian hormones and estrous cycle on the behavioral response to cocaine in female rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 293 (2000) 879-886
33. Sell S.L., Dillon A.M., Cunningham K.A., and Thomas M.L. Estrous cycle influence on individual differences in the response to novelty and cocaine in female rats. Behav Brain Res 161 (2005) 69-74
34. Stead J.D.H., Clinton S., Neal C., Schneider J., Jama A., Miller S., et al. Selective bredding for divergence in novelty-seeking traits: heritability and enrichment in spontaneous anxiety-related behaviors. Behav Genet 36 (2006) 697-712
35. Walker Q.D., Cabassa J., Kaplan K.A., Li S.T., Haroon J., Spohr H.A., et al. Sex differences in cocaine-stimulated motor behavior: disparate effects of gonadectomy. Neuropsychopharmacology 25 (2001) 118-130
36. Walker Q.D., Ray R., and Kuhn C.M. Sex differences in neurochemical effects of dopaminergic drugs in rat striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (2006) 1193-1202