Fuzzy axiomatic design extension for managing model selection paradigm in decision science

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 3 PART 2, 2009, Pages 6477-6484

  Celik, Metin ^a   Er, I Deha ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

FAD; FAD MSI; Hybrid decision models; MCDM; Model selection paradigm; Ship management

Indexed keywords

SHIPS;

DECISION MODELS; FAD-MSI; MCDM; MODEL SELECTION; SHIP MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 58349109044     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.038     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Albadvi A. Formulating national information technology strategies: A preference ranking model using PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research 153 2 (2004) 290-296
2. Alizadeh A.H., and Nomikos N.K. Trading strategies in the market for tankers. Maritime Policy & Management 33 2 (2006) 119-140
3. Alizadeh A.H., and Nomikos N.K. Investment timing and trading strategies in the sale and purchase market for ships. Transportation Research Part B 41 1 (2007) 126-143
4. Al-Shemmeri T., Al-Kloub B., and Pearman A. Model choice in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research 97 (1997) 550-560
5. Bae S., Lee J.M., and Chu C.N. Axiomatic design of automotive suspension systems. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 51 1 (2002) 115-118
6. Barlow, J. (1987). Interactive decision frameworks for multicritiera optimization. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Colorado at Boulder.
7. Celik, M., & Er, I. D. (2006). Methodology of establishing executive maritime business administration program for maritime transportation industry. In Third international conference on maritime transport (pp. 953-961). Barcelona, Spain, 16-19 May.
8. Celik M., Er I.D., and Ozok A.F. Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry. Expert Systems with Applications 36 1 (2009) 190-198
9. Celik M., Er I.D., and Topcu Y.I. Computer-based systematic execution model on human resources management in maritime transportation industry: The case of master selection for embarking on board merchant ships. Expert Systems with Application 36 (2009) 1048-1060
10. Celik M., Kahraman C., Cebi S., and Er I.D. Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards. Expert Systems with Applications 36 1 (2009) 599-615
11. Deason, J. (1984). A multi-objective decision support system for water project portfolio selection. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Virginia.
12. Egrioglu E., Aladag C.H., and Gunay S. A new model selection strategy in artificial neural networks. Applied Mathematics and Computation 195 2 (2008) 591-597
13. Engelen S., Meersman H., and Voorde E.V.D. Using system dynamics in maritime economics: An endogenous decision model for shipowners in the dry bulk sector. Maritime Policy & Management 33 2 (2006) 141-158
14. Ertay T., Ruan D., and Tuzkaya U.R. Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Information Sciences 176 3 (2006) 237-262
15. Guitouni A., and Martel J.-M. Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research 109 2 (1998) 501-521
16. Hirani H., and Suh N.P. Journal bearing design using multiobjective genetic algorithm and axiomatic design approaches. Tribology International 38 5 (2005) 481-491
17. Hobbs, B. (1986). What can we learn from experiments in multiobjective decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-16/3, 384-394.
18. Hork J. An analysis of decision-making process in multicultural maritime scenarios. Maritime Policy & Management 31 1 (2004) 15-29
19. Huang G.Q., and Jiang Z. Web-based design review of fuel pumps using fuzzy set theory. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 15 6 (2002) 529-539
20. Hwang C., and Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications: A state of the art survey (1981), Springer-Verlag, New York
21. Hwang K.-H., Lee K.-H., Park G.-J., Lee B.-L., Cho Y.-C., and Lee S.-H. Robust design of a vibratory gyroscope with an unbalanced inner torsion gimbal using axiomatic design. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 13 1 (2003) 8-17
22. Jang B.-S., Yang Y.-S., Song Y.-S., Yeun Y.-S., and Do S.-H. Axiomatic design approach for marine design problems. Marine Structures 15 1 (2002) 35-56
23. Kajanus M., Kangas J., and Kurttila M. The use of value focused thinking and the A'WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management 25 4 (2004) 499-506
24. Kevin X.L., and Cullinane K. An economic approach to maritime risk management and safety regulation. Maritime Economics & Logistics 5 3 (2003) 268-284
25. Kornyshova, E., & Salinesi, C. (2007). MCDM techniques selection approaches: State of the art. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in multicriteria decision making (pp. 22-29). Honolulu, Hawaii, April 1-5.
26. Kulak O., and Kahraman C. Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach. International Journal of Production Economics 95 (2005) 415-424
27. Kulak O., and Kahraman C. Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences 170 2 (2005) 191-210
28. Kulak O., Durmusoǧlu M.B., and Kahraman C. Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 169 (2005) 337-345
29. Kumar S., and Vaidya O. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169 1 (2006) 1-29
30. Kurttila M., Pesonen M., Kangas J., and Kajanus M. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis - a hybrid method and its application to a forest certification case. Forest Policy and Economics 1 1 (2000) 41-52
31. Lai Y.-J., Liu T.-Y., and Hwang C.-L. TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research 76 3 (1994) 486-500
32. Lee K.D., Suh N.P., and Oh J.H. Axiomatic design of machine control system. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 50 1 (2001) 109-114
33. Lee C.E., and Hsu S.C. Outsourcing capacity planning for an IC design house. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing, Technology 24 3-4 (2004) 306-320
34. Lin M.C., Wang C.C., Chen M.S., and Chang C.A. Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry 59 1 (2008) 17-31
35. Liu X., and Pedrycz W. The development of fuzzy decision trees in the framework of axiomatic fuzzy set logic. Applied Soft Computing Journal 7 1 (2007) 325-342
36. Lyridis D.V., Zacharioudakisi P., Mitrou P., and Mylonasi A. Forecasting tanker market using artificial neural networks. Maritime Economics & Logistics 6 2 (2004) 93-108
37. Lyridis D.V., Fyrvik T., Kapetanis G.N., Ventikos N., Anaxagorou P., Uthaug H.N., and Psaraftis H.N. Optimizing shipping company operations using business process modeling. Maritime Policy & Management 32 4 (2005) 403-420
38. Ozernoy V.M. A framework for choosing the most appropriate discrete alternative MCDM method in decision support systems and expert systems. Towards Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems 2 (1987) 56-64
39. Ozemoy V.M. Developing an expert system prototype for intelligent decision support. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on multiple criteria decision making (1990), Springer Verlag, Fairfax, VA
40. Panayides P.M., and Cullinane K.P.B. The vertical disintegration of ship management: Choice criteria for third party selection and evaluation. Maritime Policy and Management 29 1 (2002) 45-64
41. Panayides P.M. Maritime policy, management, and research: Role and potential. Maritime Policy & Management 33 2 (2006) 95-105
42. Partovi F.Y. An analytic model for locating facilities strategically. Omega 34 1 (2006) 41-55
43. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research 48 3 (1991) 9-26
44. Song D.-W., and Panayides P.M. A conceptual application of cooperative game theory to liner shipping strategic alliances. Maritime Policy & Management 29 3 (2002) 285-301
45. Suh N.P. The principles of design (1990), Oxford University Press, New York
46. Suh N.P. Axiomatic design; advanced applications (2001), Oxford University Press
47. Suh N.P., Cochran D.S., and Paulo C.L. Manufacturing system design. CIRP Annals 47 2 (1998) 627-639
48. Tecle, A. (1988). Choice of multicriteria decision making techniques for watershed management. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Arizona.
49. Topcu Y.I., and Ulengin F. Energy for the future: An integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29 1 (2004) 137-154
50. Townend I. Marine Science for strategic planning and management: The requirement for estuaries. Marine Policy 26 3 (2002) 209-219
51. Veenstra A.W., and Haralambides H.E. Multivariate autoregressive models for forecasting seaborne trade flows. Transportation Research Part E 37 4 (2001) 311-319
52. Vincke P. Robust and neural methods for aggregating preferences into an outranking relation. European Journal of Operational Research 112 (1999) 405-412
53. Wang X., and Triantaphyllou E. Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega 36 1 (2008) 45-63
54. Wang Y.J., and Lee H.S. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision making. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 53 11 (2007) 1762-1772