Robust and neutral methods for aggregating preferences into an outranking relation

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 405-412

  Vincke, Ph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Multicriteria analysis; Neutrality; Robustness

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 0032735932     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00439-6     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bouyssou D. Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: A characterization of the net flow method. European Journal of Operational Research. 60:1992;61-68.
2. Bouyssou D., Perny P. Ranking methods for valued preference relations: A characterization of a method based on entering and leaving flows. European Journal of Operational Research. 61:1992;186-194.
3. Kouvelis, P., Yu, G., 1997. Robust discrete optimization and its applications. Kluwer.
4. Marchant T. Valued relations aggregation with the Borda method. Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. 5:1996;127-132.
5. Pirlot M. A characterization of "min" as a procedure for exploiting valued preference relations and related results. Journal of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. 4:1995;37-56.
6. Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision. 31:1991;49-73.
7. Roy, B., 1996. Le concept de conclusions robustes en recherche opérationnelle. IFORS 96. The 14th Triennial Conference on O.R., Vancouver.
8. Roy, B., 1997. Un chaînon manquant en RO-AD: les conclusions robustes. Université Paris-Dauphine, Cahier du LAMSADE, 144.
9. Vincke Ph. Exploitation of a crisp relation in a ranking problem. Theory and Decision. 32:1992;221-240.
10. Vincke, Ph., 1998. Robust solutions and methods in decision-aid (forthcoming).