Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for repair of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children

Journal of Pediatric Urology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 25-29

  Lopez, M ^a   Guye, E ^a   Varlet, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic; Pediatric; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; INFANT; LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NEPHROSTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELONEPHRITIS; PYELOPLASTY; REVIEW; STENT; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROGRAPHY; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 58249138818     PISSN: 14775131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.08.009     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Notley R.G., and Beaugie J.M. The long-term follow-up of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis. Br J Urol 145 (1973) 464-467
2. Persky L., Krause J.R., and Boultuch R.L. Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 118 (1977) 162-165
3. Siqueira Jr. T.M., Nadu A., Kuo R.L., Paterson R.F., Lingeman J.E., and Shalhav A.L. Laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 60 (2002) 973-978
4. Smaldone M.C., Polsky E., Ricchiuti D.J., and Docimo S.G. Advances in pediatric urologic laparoscopy. Scientific World J 22 (2007) 727-741
5. Moore R.G., Averch T.D., Schulam P.G., Adams II J.B., Chen R.N., and Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases. J Urol 157 (1997) 459-462
6. Klinger H.C., Remzi M., Janetschek G., Kratzik C., and Marberger M.J. Comparision of open versus laparascopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 44 (2003) 340-345
7. Soulié M., Thoulouzan M., Seguin P., Mouly P., Vazzoler N., and Pontonnier F. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology 57 (2001) 443-447
8. Piaggio L.A., Franc-Guimond J., Noh P.H., Wehry M., Figueroa T.E., Barthold J., et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol 4 (2007) 1579-1583
9. Singh H., Ganpule A., Malhotra V., Manohar T., Muthu V., and Desai M. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol 12 (2007) 1461-1466
10. Valla J.S. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 4 (2007) 270-277
11. Canon S.J., Jayanthi V.R., and Lowe G.J. Which is better-retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?. J Urol 4 (2007) 1791-1795
12. Kutikov A., Resnick M., and Casale P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the infant younger than 6 months - is it technically possible?. J Urol 175 (2006) 1477-1479
13. Cascio S., Tien A., Chee W., and Tan H.L. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years. J Urol 177 (2007) 355-358
14. Reddy M., Nerli R.B., Bashetty R., and Ravish I.R. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 174 (2005) 700-702
15. Metzelder M.L., Schier F., Petersen C., Truss M., and Ure B.M. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol 175 (2006) 688-691
16. Reismann M., Gratz K.F., Metzelder M., Ure B., and Glüer S. Excision of the dilated pelvis is not necessary in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Eur J Pediatr Surg 18 (2008) 19-21
17. Tan H.L. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 162 (1999) 1045-1047
18. Basiri A., Behjati S., Zand S., and Moghaddam S.M. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery. J Endourol 9 (2007) 1045-1051
19. Piaggio L.A., Noh P.H., and Gonzalez R. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol 5 (2007) 1878-1882
20. Godbole P., Mushtaq I., Wilcox D.T., and Duffy P.G. Laparoscopic transposition of lower pole vessels - the 'vascular hitch': an alternative to dismembered pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children. J Pediatr Urol 2 (2006) 285-289
21. Neheman A., Noh P.H., Piaggio L., and Gonzalez R. The role of laparoscopic surgery for urinary tract reconstruction in infants weighing less than 10 kg: a comparison with open surgery. J Pediatr Urol 3 (2008) 192-196
22. Neheman A., Noh P.H., Brenn R., and Gonzalez R. Laparoscopic urinary tract surgery in infants weighting 6 kg or less: perioperative considerations and comparison to open surgery. J Urol 4 (2008) 1534-1538
23. Sukumar S., Nair B., Sanjeevan K.V., Mathew G., and Bhat H.S. Laparoscopic assisted dismembered pyeloplasty in children: intermediate results. Pediatr Surg Int 4 (2008) 403-406
24. Lam P.N., Wong C., Mulholland T.L., Campbell J.B., and Kropp B.P. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-years experience. J Endourol 12 (2007) 1467-1471
25. Braga L.H., Pippi-Salle J., Lorenzo A.J., Bagli D., Khoury A.E., and Farhat W.A. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a referral center: lessons learned. J Endourol 7 (2007) 738-742