Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1045-1051

  Basiri, A ^a   Behjati, S ^a   Zand, S ^a   Moghaddam, S M Hosseini ^a  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUROSEMIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROUPS BY AGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL FLAPS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 35348985462     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0414     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Whitaker RH. Clinical assessment of pelvic and urethral function. Urology 1978;12:146.
2. Jacobs JA, Berger BV, Goldman SM, et al. Ureteropelvic obstruction in adults with previously normal pyelograms: A report of cases. J Urol 1979;121:242.
3. Foley FEB. A new plastic operation for stricture at ureteropelvic junction: Report of 20 operations. J Urol 1937;38:643.
4. Scardino PL, Prince CL. Vertical flap ureteropelvioplasty: Preliminary report. South Med J 1953;46:325.
5. Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL. Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1977;118:162.
6. Lowe FC, Marshall FF. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology 1984;23:33.
7. Nguyen DH, Aliabadi H, Ercole CJ, et al. Non intubated Anderson-Hynes report of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 60 patients. J Urol 1989;142:704.
8. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mark S, et al. The long term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2001;87:287.
9. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV. Laparoscopic dis-membered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795.
10. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162:692.
11. Soulie M, Thoulouzan M, Sequin P, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: Comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology 2001;57:443.
12. Brown SL, Bichl TR, Rawlins MC, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the conventional approach. J Urol 2001;165:766.
13. Yamaguchi K, Tanaka K, Nakano Y, et al. [Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction](Jpn). Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 2006;97:737.
14. Hoenig DM, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, et al. Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy. J Endourol 1998;12:131.
15. Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Indications, technique, and long-term outcome. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:323.
16. Desai MM, Gill IS, Carvalhal EF, et al. Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: A novel technique. J Endourol 2002;16:431.
17. Kawa G, Tatsumi M, Hiura Y, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: Using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings. Int J Urol 2006;13:1171.
18. Siquera TM, Nada A., Kuo RL, et al. Laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2002;60:973.
19. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253.
20. Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard J-J, et al. Extra peritoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A multicenteral study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001;166:48.
21. Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen JD. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2001;88:526.
22. Sundaram CP, Grobb RL 3rd, Rehman J, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003;169:2037.
23. Simforoosh N, Tabibi A, Nouralizadeh A, et al. Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction by division of anterior crossing vein and cephalad relocation of anterior crossing artery. J Endourol 2005;19:827.
24. Baldwin DD, Dundar JA, Wells N, et al. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2003;17:155.
25. Jabbour ME, Goldfischer ER, Klima WJ, et al. Endopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty: The long-term results. J Urol 1998;160:690.
26. Klinger HG, Remzi M, Janetschek G, et al. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003;44:340.
27. Moon DA, El-shazly MA, Chang CM, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006;67:932.
28. Eden C, Gianduzzo T, Chang C, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2004;172:2308.
29. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohue JM, et al. Management of the failed pyeloplasty: A contemporary review. J Urol 2005;174:2363.
30. Lim DJ, Walker RD 3rd. Management of the failed pyeloplasty. J Urol 1996;156:738.