Evaluation of a new method of assessing depth of sedation using two-choice visual reaction time testing on a mobile phone

Anaesthesia

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 32-38

  Thomson, A J ^a   Nimmo, A F ^a   Tiplady, B ^a   Glen, J B ^b  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b Glen Pharma Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL; HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT;

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RESPONSE; EFFECT SIZE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; SEDATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ARTICLE; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DECISION MAKING; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION;

ADULT; CELLULAR PHONE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROPOFOL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 58249087235     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05683.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 1990; 10: 244-51.
2. Ramsay MAE, Savege TM, Simpson BRJ, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. British Medical Journal 1974; 2: 656-9.
3. De Jonghe B, Cook D, Appere-De-Vecchi C, Guyatt G, Meade M, Outin H. Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine 2000; 26: 275-85.
4. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 836-47.
5. Vanluchene ALG, Struys MRF, Heyse BEK, Mortier EP. Spectral entropy measurement of patient responsiveness during propofol and remifentanil. A comparison with the bispectral index. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004; 93: 645-54.
6. Bauerle K, Greim C-A, Schroth M, Geisselbrecht M, Köbler A, Roewer N. Prediction of depth of sedation and anaesthesia by the Narcotrend™ EEG monitor. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004; 92: 841-5.
7. Sneyd JR, Samra SK, Davidson B, Kishimoto T, Kadoya C, Domino EF. Electrophysiological effects of propofol sedation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1994; 79: 1151-8.
8. Haenggi M, Ypparila H, Takala J, et al. Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2004; 99: 1728-36.
9. Kim KM, Jeon WJ, Lee DH, Kang WC, Kim JH, Noh GJ. Changes in visual and auditory response time during concious sedation with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004; 48: 1033-7.
10. Tiplady B. The use of personal digital assistants in performance testing in pharmacology. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1994; 37: 523.
11. Tiplady B. The use of a mobile phone to administer a cognitive task. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society 2005; 13: 25.
12. Pigache RM. Comparison ofscoring methods for tests of attention, including an error index for use with schizophrenic patients. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976; 42: 243-53.
13. Bond A, Lader M. The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. British Journal of Medical Psychology 1974; 47: 211-8.
14. Chapman RM, Anderson K, Green J, Leitch JA, Gambhir S, Kenny GNC. Evaluation of a new effect-site controlled, patient-maintained sedation system in dental patients. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 345-9.
15. Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GNC. Pharmaco-kinetic model driven infusion of Diprivan in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991; 67: 41-8.
16. Lim TA. A novel method of deriving the effect compartment equilibration rate constant for propofol. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; 91: 730-2.
17. White M, Schenkels MJ, Engbers FHM, et al. Effect-site modelling of propofol using auditory evoked potentials. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1999; 82: 333-9.
18. Struys MRF, De Smet T, Depoorter B, et al. Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 399-406.
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between 2 methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
20. Finney DJ. Statistical Method in Biological Assay, 2nd edn. London: Griffin, 1964.
21. Sessler CN. Sedation scales in the ICU. Chest 2004; 126: 1727-30.
22. McCormack HM, Horne DJD, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychological Medicine 1988; 18: 1007-19.
23. Ibrahim AE, Taraday JK, Kharasch ED. Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane, midazolam and propofol. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1151-9.
24. Chisholm CJ, Zurica J, Mironov D, Sciacca RR, Ornstein E, Heyer EJ. Comparison of electrophysiologic monitors with clinical assessment of level of sedation. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2006; 81: 46-52.
25. 2O sedation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2003; 47: 951-7.