Change in patient concerns following total knee arthroplasty described with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A repeated measures design

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 6, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Rastogi, Ravi ^a   Chesworth, Bert M ^b   Davis, Aileen M ^c,d  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ANXIETY; CLASSIFICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; HEALTH STATUS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; INTERVIEW; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

AGED; ANXIETY; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;

EID: 58149485378     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-112     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Davis MA Ettinger WH Neuhaus JM Mallon KP Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: Evidence from the NHANES I epidemiologic followup study J Rheumatol 1991, 18:591-598 2066950
2. Hartley RC Barton-Hanson NG Finley R Parkinson W Early patient outcomes after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002, 84:994-999 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12607 12358393
3. Heck DA Robinson RL Partridge CM Lubitz R Freund DA Patient outcomes after knee replacement Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 1:93-110 10.1097/ 00003086-199811000-00015
4. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada 2006 Report.
5. Dickstein R Heffes Y Shabtai E Markowitz E Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: Patients' self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively Gerontology 1998, 44:204-210 10.1159/000022011 9657080
6. Salmon P Hall GM Peerbhoy D Shenkin A Parker C Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: Patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively Arch Phys Med and Rehabil 2001, 82:360-366 10.1053/apmr.2001.21522
7. Noble PC Conditt MA Cook KF Mathis KB The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:35-43 10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e 16967035
8. McFarlane A Brooks P The assessment of disability and handicap in musculoskeletal disease J Rheumatol 1997, 24(5):985-989 9150096
9. Newman S Psychosocial measures in musculoskeletal trials J Rheumatol 1997, 24(5):979-984 9150095
10. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001
11. Stucki G Cieza A Ewert T Kostanjsek N Chatterji S Ustun TB Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24:281-282 10.1080/09638280110105222 12004974
12. Whiteneck G Conceptual models of disability: Past, present, and future. Workshop on Disability in America: A new look - summary and background papers The National Academic Press, Washington DC Field MJ, Jette AM, Martin L 2006 Appendix B:50-66.
13. Jette AM Haley SM Kooyoomjian JT Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003, 35:145-149 10.1080/ 16501970310010501 12809198
14. Perenboom RJM Chorus AMJ Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25:577-587 10.1080/0963828031000137081 12959331
15. Rastogi R Davis AM Chesworth BM Patient concerns in the first six weeks following primary total knee arthroplasty Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5:48 doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-48. 1950700 17678532 10.1186/ 1477-7525-5-48
16. Farrar JT Young JP Jr LaMoreaux L Werth JL Poole RM Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale Pain 2001, 94:149-158 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9 11690728
17. Roos EM Toksvig-Larsen S Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:17-26 161802 12801417 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17
18. Ethgen O Bruyere O Richy F Dardennes C Reginster J-V Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004, 86(5):963-74 15118039
19. Sangha O Stucki G Liang MH Fossel AH Katz JN The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research Arthritis Care Res 2003, 49:156-163 10.1002/art.10993
20. Portney LG Watkins MP Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice New Jersey; Prentice Hall Health 2 2000.
21. Winer BJ Single-factor experiments having repeated measures on the same elements Statistical principles in experimental design New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company 2 1971:261-308
22. Kennedy DM Stratford PW Wessel J Gollish JD Penney D Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: A longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005, 6:3-14 549207 15679884 10.1186/1471-2474-6-3
23. Stratford PW Kennedy DM Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59:160-167 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.012 16426951
24. Soever L Mackay C Best practices across the continuum of care for total joint replacement Greater Toronto Area Rehabilitation Network. Final Report 2005
25. Hinojosa J Youngstrom MJ Position paper: Broadening the construct of independence Am J Occup Ther 2002, 56(6):660 12630414
26. Gignac MA Cott C A conceptual model of independence and dependence for adults with chronic physical illness and disability Soc Sci Med 1998, 47(6):739-753 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00149-X 9690821
27. Dahl TH An introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research J Rehabil Med 2002, 34:201-204 10.1080/165019702760279170 12392233
28. Mahomed NN Liang MH Cook EF Daltroy LH Fortin PR Fossel AH Katz JN The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty J Rheumatol 2002, 29(6):1273-1279 12064846
29. Stratford PW Kennedy DM Hanna SE Condition-specific Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index was not superior to region-specific Lower Extremity Functional Scale at detecting change J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57:1025-1032 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.008 15528053
30. Bachmeier CJM March LM Cross MJ Lapsley HM Tribe KL Courtenay BG Brooks PM A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001, 9:137-146 10.1053/joca.2000.0369 11330253
31. Lingard EA Katz JN Wright RJ Wright EA Sledge CB Kinemax Outcomes group Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001, 83:1856-1864 11741066