A cross-sectional look at patient concerns in the first six weeks following primary total knee arthroplasty

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 5, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Rastogi, Ravi ^a   Davis, Aileen M ^b,c   Chesworth, Bert M ^d,e  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d Faculty of Health Sciences   (Canada)

^e WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOATHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; LIFE STRESS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; CANADA; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CANADA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 34548784348     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-48     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Davis MA Ettinger WH Neuhaus JM Mallon KP Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: Evidence from the NHANES I epidemiologic followup study The Journal of Rheumatology 1991, 18:591-598. 2066950
2. Heck DA Robinson RL Partridge CM Lubitz R Freund DA Patient outcomes after knee replacement Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1998, 1(356):93-110. 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00015
3. Hartley RC Barton-Hanson NG Finley R Parkinson W Early patient outcomes after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2002, 84B:994-999. 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12607
4. Liang MH Fossel AH Larson MG Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation Medical Care 1990, 28:632-642. 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008 2366602
5. Kreibich DN Vaz M Bourne RB et al.: What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1996, 331:221-225. 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00031
6. Stratford PW Binkley JM Watson J Heath-Jones T Validation of the LEFS on patients with total joint arthroplasty Physiotherapy Canada 2000, 52:97-105.
7. Dickstein R Heffes Y Shabtai E Markowitz E Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: Patients' self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively Gerontology 1998, 44:204-210. 10.1159/000022011 9657080
8. Trousdale RT McGrory BJ Berry DJ Becker MW Harmsen WS Patients' concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1999, 74:978-982. 10918863
9. Moran M Khan A Sochart DH Andrew G Evaluation of patient concerns before total knee and hip arthroplasty The Journal of Arthroplasty 2003, 18:442-445. 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00061-5 12820086
10. Weiss JM Noble PC Conditt MA Kohl HW Roberts S Cook KF Gordon MJ Mathis KB What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2002, 404:172-188. 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00030
11. McFarlane A Brooks P The assessment of disability and handicap in musculoskeletal disease Journal of Rheumatology 1997, 24-5:985-989.
12. Newman S Psychosocial measures in musculoskeletal trials Journal of Rheumatology 1997, 24-5:979-984.
13. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001.
14. Stucki G International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): A promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005, 84:733-740. 10.1097/01.phm.0000179521.70639.83
15. Roos EM Roos HP Lohmander LS Ekdahl C Beynnon BD Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1998, 28(2):88-96.
16. Bellamy N Buchanan WW Goldsmith CH Campbell J Stitt LW Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee Journal of Rheumatology 1988, 5:1833-1840.
17. Dawson J Fitzpatrick R Murray D Carr A Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1998, 80B:63-69. 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7859
18. Roos EM Toksvig-Larsen S Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003, 1:17-26. 10.1186/ 1477-7525-1-17
19. Ethgen O Bruyere O Richy F Dardennes C Reginster J-V Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2004, 86A(5):963-974.
20. Salmon P Hall GM Peerbhoy D Shenkin A Parker C Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: Patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001, 82:360-366. 10.1053/apmr.2001.21522
21. Fitzgerald JD Orav EJ Lee TH Marcantonio ER Poss R Goldman L Mangione CM Patient Quality of Life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery Arthritis and Rheumatism 2004, 51:100-109. 10.1002/art.20090
22. Oldmeadow LB McBurney H Robertson VJ Hospital stay and discharge outcomes after knee arthroplasty: Implications for physiotherapy practice Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2002, 48:117-121. 12047209
23. Barksdale P Backer J Health-related stressors experienced by patients who underwent total knee replacement seven days after being discharged home Orthopaedic Nursing 2005, 24:336-342. 10.1097/ 00006416-200509000-00009 16272912
24. Karlson EW Daltroy LH Liang MH Eaton HE Katz JN Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery The American Journal of Medicine 1997, 102:524-530. 10.1016/ S0002-9343(97)00050-8 9217666
25. Soever L Mackay C Best practices across the continuum of care for total joint replacement Final Report Greater Toronto Area Rehabilitation Network 2005