Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 775-790

  Shafiro, Valeriy ^a,b  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; RATING SCALE; SOUND; SOUND DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRAINING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDITIONING; ENVIRONMENT; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TEST; MALE; METHODOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MALE; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149395348     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31817e08ea     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baddeley, A. D., & Wilson, B. A. (1993). A case of word deafness with preserved span: implications for the structure and function of short-term memory. Cortex, 29, 741-748.
2. Ballas, J. A. (1993). Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 19(2), 250-267.
3. Blamey, P. J., Dowell, R. C., & Tong, Y. C., et al. (1984). Speech perception studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am, 76, 104-110.
4. CHABA Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired. (1991). Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: Current status and needed research. J Acoust Soc Am, 90(2), 637-685.
5. Chute, P., Nevins, M. E., & Parisier, S. (1996). Managing educational issues through the process of implantation. In D. J. Allum (Ed.), Cochlear implant rehabilitation in children and adults. London: Whurr Publishers.
6. Clark, G. (2003). Cochlear implants: fundamentals and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Dorman, M. F. (1993). Speech perception by adults. In R. S. Tyler (Ed.), Cochlear implants: audiological foundations. San Diego: Singlular Publishing Group.
8. Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C., & Rainey, D. (1997). Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. J Acoust Soc Am, 102(4), 2403-2411.
9. Dudley, H. (1939). Remaking speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 11(1), 165.
10. Edgerton, B. J., Prietto, A., & Danhauer, J. L. (1983). Cochlear implant patient performance on the MAC battery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 16, 267-280.
11. Eisenberg, L. S., Berliner, K. I., & House, W. F., et al. (1983). Status of the adults' and children's cochlear implant programs at the House Ear Institute. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 405, 323-331.
12. Eisenberg, L. S. (1985). Perceptual capabilities with the cochlear implant: implications for aural rehabilitation. Ear Hear, 6, 60S-69S.
13. Fabiani, M., Kazmerski, V. A., & Cycowicz, Y. M., et al. (1996). Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: effects of age and dementia. Psychophysiology, 33, 462-475. (Pubitemid 26230733)
14. Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Stanton, D. (2003). Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth. J Acoust Soc Am, 113(2), 1073-1080. (Pubitemid 36240733)
15. Fowler, C. A. (1990). Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 1236-1249.
16. Fowler, C. A., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1990). Duplex perception: a comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 16(4), 742-754.
17. Fu, Q., & Galvin J. J. III. (2003). The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 113(2), 1065-1072. (Pubitemid 36240732)
18. Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecol Psychol, 5, 1-29.
19. Gfeller, K., Witt, S., & Adamek, et al. (2002). Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol, 13(3), 132-145. (Pubitemid 34467516)
20. Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S., (2004). Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 1252-1265. (Pubitemid 38298575)
21. Humes, L. E., Watson, B. U., & Christensen, L. A., et al. (1994). Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Speech Hear Res, 37(2), 465-474.
22. Jenkins, J. J. (1985). Acoustic information for objects, places and events. In W. H. Warren & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and change (pp. 115-138). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Lancker, D., Cornelius, C., & Kreiman, J., et al. (1988). Recognition of environmental sounds in autistic children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 27, 423-427. (Pubitemid 18181339)
24. Lawrence, D. M., & Banks, W. P. (1973). Accuracy of recognition memory for common sounds. Bull Psychon Soc, 1, 298-300.
25. Li, X., Logan, R. J., & Pastore, R. E. (1993). Perception of acoustic source characteristics: walking sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 90, 3036-3049.
26. Maddox, E. H., & Porter, T. H. (1983). Rehabilitation and results with the single electrode cochlear implant. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 16, 257-265.
27. Marcell, M. M., Borella, D., & Greene, J., et al. (2000). Confrontation naming of environmental sounds. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 22, 830-864.
28. Piccirilli, M., Sciarma, T., & Luzzi, S. (2000). Modularity of music: evidence from a case of pure amusia. J Neurol, 69, 541-545. (Pubitemid 30742000)
29. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. J Exp Psychol, 77(3), 353-363.
30. Proops, D. W., Donaldson, I., & Cooper, H. R., et al. (1999). Outcomes from adult implantation, the first 100 patients. J Laryngol Otol, 113, 5-13. (Pubitemid 29387132)
31. Ramsdell, D. A. (1978). The psychology of the hard-of-hearing and the deafened adult. In H. Davis & S. R. Silverman (Eds.), Hearing and deafness (pp. 499-510). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
32. Reed, C. M., & Delhorne, L. A. (2005). Reception of environmental sounds through cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 26(1), 48-61.
33. Repp, B. H. (1987). The sound of two hands clapping. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 1100-1109.
34. Rosen, S., Fourcin, A. J., & Abberton, E., et al. (1985). Assessing assessment. In R. A. Schindler, & M. M. Merzenich (Eds.), Cochlear implants (pp. 479-498). New York: Raven Press.
35. Schafer, R. M. (1977). The tuning of the world. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
36. Schindler, R. A., & Dorcas, K. K. (1987). The UCSF/STORZ cochlear implant: patient performance. Am J Otol, 8, 247-255.
37. Schnider, A., Benson, D. F., & Alexander, D. N., et al. (1994). Non-verbal environmental sound recognition after unilateral hemispheric stroke. Brain, 117, 281-287. (Pubitemid 24155500)
38. Shafiro, V., & Gygi, B. (2004). How to select stimuli for environmental sound research and where to find them. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 36(4), 590-598. (Pubitemid 40251409)
39. Shafiro, V. (2008). Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution. Ear & Hear, 29, 401-420.
40. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F., & Kamath, V., et al. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270(5234), 303-304.
41. Spreen, O. & Benton, A. L. (1974). Test of sound recognition. Iowa City: Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals.
42. Tye-Murray, N., Tyler, R. S., & Woodworth, G. G., et al. (1992). Performance over time with a nucleus or ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 13, 200-209.
43. Tyler, R. S., Abbas, P., & Tye-Murray, N., et al. (1988). Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audiologic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope, 98(1), 1100-1106. (Pubitemid 18244325)
44. Tyler, R. S., Lowder, M. A., & Gantz, B. J., et al. (1985). Audiological results with two single channel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 94, 133-139.
45. Tyler, R. S., Moore, B., & Kuk, F. (1989). Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 32, 887-911. (Pubitemid 20015444)
46. Tyler, R. S. (1994). Advantages and disadvantages expected and reported by cochlear implant patients. Am J Otol, 15, 523-531.
47. Uchanski, R. M., & Braida, L. D. (1998). Effects of token variability on our ability to distinguish between vowels. Percept and Psychophys, 60(4), 533-543.
48. Varney, N. R. (1980). Sound recognition in relation to aural language comprehension in aphasic patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 43, 71-75.
49. Varney, N. R., & Damasio, H. (1986). CT scan correlates of sound recognition defect in aphasia. Cortex, 22, 483-486.
50. Watson, C. S., & Kidd, G. R. (2002). On the lack of association between basic auditory abilities, speech processing and other cognitive skills. Semin Hear, 23, 83-93.
51. Zhao, F., Stephens, S. D. G., & Sim, S. W., et al. (1997). The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants. Clin Otolaryngol, 22, 254-259. (Pubitemid 28344978)