Reception of environmental sounds through cochlear implants

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 48-61

  Reed, Charlotte M ^a   Delhorne, Lorraine A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BACTERIAL MENINGITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFUSION; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC DISEASE; NOISE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; SOUND DETECTION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SOUND; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 13444278830     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200502000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aldenderfer, M.S., & Blashfield, R.K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Ballas, J. A. (1993). Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 250-267.
3. Ballas, J. A., & Mullins, T. (1991). Effects of context on the identification of everyday sounds. Human Performance, 4, 199-219.
4. Bernstein, L.E. (1992). The evaluation of tactile aids. In: I.E. Summers (editor), Tactile Aids for the Hearing Impaired (pp. 167-186). London: Whurr Publishers.
5. Compton, C.L. (1995). Selecting what's best for the individual. In: R.S. Tyler & D.J. Schum (editors), Assistive Devices for Persons with Hearing Impairment (pp. 224-250). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Donaldson, G. S., & Nelson, D. A. (2000). Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1645-1658.
7. Dorman, M.F. (1993). Speech recognition by adult users of cochlear implants. In: R. Tyler (editor), Cochlear implants: Audiological foundations (pp. 145-190). San Diego: Singular.
8. Eddington, D. K. (1983). Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel, intracochlear electrodes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 405, 241-258.
9. Everitt, B. (1980). Cluster analysis (2nd edition). New York: Halsted Press.
10. Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., & Wang, X. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1150-1163.
11. Fu, Q-J., & Shannon, R. V. (1999). Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Eur and Hearing, 20, 321-331.
12. Gantz, B. J., Woodworth, G. G., Knutson, J. F., Abbas, P. J., & Tyler, R. S. (1993). Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 102, 909-916.
13. Guerts, L., & Wouters, J. (1999). Enhancing the speech envelope of continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2476-2484.
14. Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2004). Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental-sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1252-1265.
15. Harkins, J.E. (1991). Visual devices for deaf and hard of hearing people: State-of-the-art. GRI Monograph Series, Series A, No. 2 Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
16. Henry, B. A., & Turner, C. W. (2003). The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 2861-2873.
17. Kirman, J.H. (1973). Tactile communication of speech: A review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 54-74.
18. Knutson, J.F., Hinrichs, J.V., Tyler, R.S., Gantz, B.J., Schartz, H.A., & Woodworth, G. (1991). Psychological predictors of audiological outcomes of multichannel cochlear implants: Preliminary findings. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 100, 817-822.
19. Lorr, M. (1983). Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publications.
20. Miller, G. A. (1954). What is information measurement? The American Psychologist, 8, 3-11.
21. Munson, B., Donaldson, G. S., Allen, S. L., Collison, E. A., & Nelson, D. A. (2003). Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 925-935.
22. Parkinson, A. J., Parkinson, W. S., Tyler, R. S., Lowder, M. W., & Gantz, B. J. (1998). Speech perception in experienced cochlearimplant patients receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41, 1073-1087.
23. Perkell, J., Lane, H., Svirsky, M., & Webster, J. (1992). Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2961-2978.
24. Proops, D. W., Donaldson, L, Cooper, H. R., Thomas, J., Burrell, S. P., Stoddart, R. L., Moore, A., & Cheshire, I. M. (1999). Outcomes from adult implantation, the first 100 patients. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 113, 5-13.
25. Rabinowitz, W. M., Eddington, D. K., Delhorne, L. A., & Cuneo, P. A. (1992). Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1869-1881.
26. Ramsdell, D.A. (1978). The psychology of the hard-of-hearing and the deafened adult. In: H. Davis & S.R. Silverman (editors), Hearing and deafness (pp. 499-510). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27. Reed, C.M., & Delhorne, L.A. (2003). The reception of environmental-sounds through wearable tactual aids. Ear and Hearing, 24, 528-538.
28. Reed, C.M., Durlach, N.I., & Braida, L.D. (1982). Research on Tactile Communication of Speech: A Review (ASHA Monographs, No. 20). Rockville, MD: American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
29. Schafer, R.M. (1977). The Tuning of the World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
30. Skinner, M.W., Clark, G.M., Whitford, L.A., Seligman, P.M., Staller, S.J., Shipp, D.B., Shallop, J.K., Everingham, C., Menapace, C.M., Arndt, P.L., Antogenelli, T., Brimacombe, J.A., Fiji, S., Daniels, P., George, C.R., McDermott, H.J., & Beiter, A.L. (1994). Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. The American Journal of Otology, 15 (Suppl. 2), 15-27.
31. Skinner, M. W., Fourakis, M. S., Holden, T. A., Holden, L. K., & Demorest, M. E. (1996). Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies: I. Vowels. Ear and Hearing, 17, 182-197.
32. Skinner, M. W., Fourakis, M. S., Holden, T. A., Holden, L. K., & Demorest, M. E. (1999). Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies: II. Consonants. Ear and Hearing, 20, 443-460.
33. Tye-Murray, N., Tyler, R. S., Woodworth, G. G., & Gantz, B. J. (1992). Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 13, 200-209.
34. Tyler, R. S. (1994). Advantages and disadvantages expected and reported by cochlear implant patients. The American Journal of Otology, 15, 523-531.
35. Tyler, R. S., & Moore, B. C. J. (1992). Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3068-3077.
36. Välimaa, T. T., Määttä, T.K., Löppönen, H. J., & Sorri, M. J. (2002). Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: Consonants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1055-1069.
37. Vandali, A. E. (2001). Emphasis of short-duration acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2049-2061.
38. Van Wieringen, A., & Wouters, J. (1999). Natural vowel and consonant recognition by Laura cochlear implantees. Ear and Hearing, 20, 89-103.
39. Wilson, B.S., Finley, C.C., Lawson, D.T., Wolford, R.D., Eddington, O.K., & Rabinowitz, W.M. (1991). Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352 (6332), 236-238.
40. Youngblood, J., & Robinson, S. (1988). Ineraid (Utah) multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope, 98, 5-10.
41. Zhao, F., Stephens, S. D. G., Sim, S. W., & Meredith, R. (1997). The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants. Clinical Otolaryngology, 22, 254-259.
42. Eddington, D.K., Garcia, N., Noel, V.A., Rabinowitz, W.M., Svirsky, M.A., Tierney, J., & Whearty, M.E. (1996). Speech processors for auditory prostheses. First Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Contract N01-DC-6-2100.
43. Lawson, D., Wilson, B., & Zerbi, M. (1998). Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Project N01-DC-5-2103.