PM10 data assimilation over Europe with the optimal interpolation method

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 57-70

  Tombette, M ^a,b   Mallet, V ^a,b   Sportisse, B ^a,b  

^a EDF R AND D   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOL COMPOSITION; DATA ASSIMILATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; PARTICULATE MATTER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 58149382171     PISSN: 16807316     EISSN: 16807324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-57-2009     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allen, G., Sioutas, C., Koutrakis, P., Reiss, R., Lurmann, F., and Roberts, R: Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas, J. Air Waste Manage., 47, 682-689, 1997.
2. Austin, J.: Toward the four dimensional assimilation of stratospheric chemical constituents, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2569-2588, 1992.
3. Balgovind, R., Dalcher, A., Ghil, M., and Kalnay, E.: A Stochastic-Dynamic Model for the Spatial Structure of Forecast Error Statistics, Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 701-722, 1983.
4. Benedetti, A. and Fisher, M.: Background error statistics for aerosols, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 391-405, 2007.
5. Bouttier, R and Courtier, P.: Data assimilation concepts and methods, in: Meteorological Training Course Lecture Series, ECMWF, 2001.
6. Boylan, J. and Russell, A.: PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946-4959, 2006.
7. Chang, M. E., Hartley, D. E., Cardelino, C., Haas-Laursen, D., and Chang, W.-L.: On using inverse methods for resolving emissions with large spatial inhomogeneities, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16023-16036, 1997.
8. Charron, A., Harrison, R., Moorcroft, S., and Booker, J.: Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PMjo and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments, Atmos. Environ., 38, 415-423, 2003.
9. Chin, M., Rood, R., Lin, S.-J., Muller, J. F., and Thompson, A. M.: Atmospheric sulfur cycle in the global model GOCART: Model description and global properties, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24671-24688, 2000.
10. Collins, W. D., Rasch, R J., Eaton, B. E., Khattatov, B. V., Lamarque, J.-F., and Zender, C. S.: Simulating aerosols using a chemical transport model with assimilation of satellite aerosol retrievals: Methodology for INDOEX, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7313-7336, 2001.
11. Daley, R.: Atmospheric Data Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
12. Debry, E., Fahey, K., Sartelet, K., Sportisse, B., and Tombette, M.: Technical note: A new Size REsolved Aerosol Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1537-1547, 2007. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/1537/2007/.
13. Elbern, H., Schmidt, H., and Ebel, A.: Variational data assimilation for tropospheric chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15967-15985, 1997.
14. Elbern, H., Strunk, A., Schmidt, H., and Talagrand, O.: Emission rate and chemical state estimation by 4-dimensional variational inversion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3749-3769, 2007, http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3749/2007/.
15. Fahey, K. M. and Pandis, S. N.: Optimizing model performance: variable size resolution in cloud chemistry modeling, Atmos. Environ., 35, 4471-4478, 2001.
16. Fisher, M. and Lary, D. J.: Lagrangian Four Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation of Chemical Species, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 121, 1681-1704 Part A, 1995.
17. Generoso, S., Bréon, F.-M., Balkanski, Y., Chevallier, F., Schulz, M., and Bey, I.: Assimilation of POLDER Aerosol Optical Thickness into the LMDz-INCA model: Implication for the Arctic aerosol burden, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02311, doi:10.1029/2005JD006954, 2007.
18. 10, Atmos. Environ., 35, 2589-2593, 2001.
19. Hanna, S. R., Chang, J. C., and Fernau, M. E.: Monte Carlo estimates of uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to uncertainties in input variables, Atmos. Environ., 32, 3619-3628, 1998.
20. Hodzic, A., Madronich, S., Bohn, B., Massie, S., Menut, L., and Wiedinmyer, C.: Wildfire particulate matter in Europe during summer 2003: Meso-scale modeling of smoke emissions, transport and radiative effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4043-4064, 2007, http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/4043/2007/.
21. Hollingsworth, A. and Lönnberg, P.: The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part I: the wind field, Tellus, 38A, 111-136, 1986.
22. 10 concentrations in Belgium, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3279-3289, 2005.
23. Huneeus, N.: Assimilation variationnelle d'observations satellitaires dans un modèle atmosphérique d'aérosols, Ph.D. thesis, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 2007.
24. Jeuken, A., Eskes, H., Van Velthoven, P., Kelder, H., and Holm, E.: Assimilation of total ozone satellite measurements in a threedimensional tracer transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 5551-5563, 1999.
25. 2.5 measurements in ambient aerosol: comparison between Harvard Impactor (HI) and the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) system, The Science of The Total Environment, 278, 191-197, 2001.
26. Levelt, P., Khattatov, B., Gille, J., Brasseur, G., Tie, X., and Waters, J.: Assimilation of MLS ozone measurements in the global 3D CTM ROSE, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 4493-M96, 1998.
27. Mallet, V. and Sportisse, B.: Uncertainty in a chemistry-transport model due to physical parametrizations and numerical approximations: An ensemble approach applied to ozone modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 111, doi:10.1029/ 2005JD006149, 2006.
28. Mallet, V., Quélo, D., Sportisse, B., Ahmed de Biasi, M., Debry, E., Korsakissok, I., Wu, L., Roustan, Y., Sartelet, K., Tombette, M., and Foudhil, H.: Technical Note: The air quality modeling system Polyphemus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5479-5487, 2007, http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/5479/2007/.
29. Ménard, R., Cohn, S. E., Chang, L.-P., and Lyster, R M.: Assimilation of stratospheric chemical tracer observations using a Kaiman filter. Part I: Formulation, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 2654-2671, 2000.
30. Nenes, A., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic model for inorganic multicomponent atmospheric aerosols, Aquatic Geochem., 4,123-152, 1998.
31. Planet, W.: Determination of total ozone amount from TIROS radiance measurements, J. Appl. Meteor., 23, 308-316, 1984.
32. x emissions at regional, scale over Northern France. Preliminary investigation of the second-order sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D24310, doi:10.1029/2055JD006151, 2005.
33. Riishojgaard, L.: On four-dimensional variational assimilation of ozone data weather prediction models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 1545-1571, 1996.
34. Roustan, Y., Sartelet, K. N., Tombette, M., Debry, E., Fahey, K. M., and Sportisse, B.: Simulation of aerosols and gas-phase species over Europe with the Polyphemus system. Part II: Sensitivity analysis., Technical report no 2008-7, CEREA, Atmos. Environ., 2008.
35. Salter, L. and. Parsons, B.: Field trials of the TEOM and the Partisol for PMio monitoring in China clay area, Cornwall, UK, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2111-2114, 1999.
36. Sartelet, K. N., Debry, E., Fahey, K. M., Roustan, Y., Tombette, M., and Sportisse, B.: Simulation of aerosols and gas-phase species over Europe with the Polyphemus system. Part I: model-to-data comparison for 2001, Atmos. Environ., 29, 6116-6.131, 2007.
37. Schell, B., Ackermann, I. J., and Haas, H.: Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28275-28293, 2001.
38. Segers, A.: Data assimilation in atmospheric chemistry models using Kaiman filtering, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University, The Netherlands, 2002.
39. Smith, S., Stribley, T., Barratt, B., and Perryman, C.: Determination of Partisol, TEOM, ACCU and cascade impactor instruments in the London Borough of Greenwich, Clean Air, 27, 70-73, 1997.
40. 10 sampling head and the tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) system, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4373-4377, 1999.
41. Stockwell, W., Kirchner, F., and Kuhn, M.: A new mechanism, for regional chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 25847-25879, 1997.
42. Strader, R., Gurciullo, C., Pandis, S., Kumar, N., and Lurmann, R: Development of a gas-phase chemistry, secondary organic aerosol and aqueous-phase chemistry modules for PM modelling, Technical report, STI, 1998.
43. Van Loon, M., Roemer, M., and Builtjes, P.: Model intercomparison in the framework of the review of the Unified EMEP model, Tech. rep., TNO Environment Energy and Process Innovation, TNO report - R2004/282, 2004.
44. Wu, L., Mallet, V., Bocquet, M., and Sportisse, B.: A comparison study of data assimilation algorithms for ozone forecasts, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20310, doi:10.1029/2008JD009991, 2008.