Leaf development: time to turn over a new leaf?

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 9-16

  Micol, José Luis ^a  

^a MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS; MUTATION; PLANT LEAF; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW;

EVOLUTION; GENOMICS; MORPHOGENESIS; MUTATION; PLANT LEAVES; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS;

EID: 58149295943     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.11.001     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Zhu X.-G., Long S.P., and Ort D.R. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass?. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19 (2008) 153-159
2. Karp A., and Shield I. Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytologist 179 (2008) 15-32
3. ••] gives a panoramic and detailed view of the transcription factors and regulatory microRNAs that participate in leaf initiation, polarization, patterning, and evolution.
4. ••] gives a panoramic and detailed view of the transcription factors and regulatory microRNAs that participate in leaf initiation, polarization, patterning, and evolution.
5. ••] gives a panoramic and detailed view of the transcription factors and regulatory microRNAs that participate in leaf initiation, polarization, patterning, and evolution.
6. Prusinkiewicz P., and Rolland-Lagan A.G. Modeling plant morphogenesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9 (2006) 83-88
7. Feild T.S., and Arens N.C. The ecophysiology of early angiosperms. Plant, Cell Environ 30 (2007) 291-309
8. Beerling D.J. Leaf evolution: gases, genes and geochemistry. Ann Botany 96 (2005) 345-352
9. Beerling D.J., and Fleming A.J. Zimmermann's telome theory of megaphyll leaf evolution: a molecular and cellular critique. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10 (2007) 4-12
10. Rensing S.A., Lang D., Zimmer A.D., Terry A., Salamov A., Shapiro H., Nishiyama T., Perroud P.F., Lindquist E.A., Kamisugi Y., et al. The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 319 (2008) 64-69
11. Reinholz E. X-Ray mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. and their significance for plant breeding and the theory of evolution. Fiat Rep 1006 (1947) 1-70
12. Müller A.J. Embryonentest zum nachweis rezessiver letalfaktoren bei Arabidopsis thaliana. Biol Zentbl 82 (1963) 133-163
13. Rédei G.P. Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. A review of the biology and genetics. Bibliogr Genet 20 (1970) 1-151
14. Kirchheim B., and Kranz A.R. Computerized listing of the Arabidopsis Information Service seed bank material. Arabidopsis Inf Serv 22 (1985) 147-152
15. Meyerowitz E.M. Prehistory and history of Arabidopsis research. Plant Physiology 125 (2001) 15-19. A must read review for anyone interested in the origins of the scientific community that made Arabidopsis a model species that rivals the fruit fly in its ability to illuminate modern Biology.
16. Feldmann K.A., and Marks M.D. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of germinating-seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana-a non-tissue culture approach. Mol Gen Genet 208 (1987) 1-9
17. Feldmann K.A. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: mutational spectrum. Plant J 1 (1991) 71-82
18. Berná G., Robles P., and Micol J.L. A mutational analysis of leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 152 (1999) 729-742
19. Robles P., and Micol J.L. Genome-wide linkage analysis of Arabidopsis genes required for leaf development. Mol Genet Genomics 266 (2001) 12-19
20. ••] describes one of the first Arabidopsis leaf phenomic studies. The authors provide a view of the cellular behavior underlying leaf shape and size variations in a large collection of form mutants.
21. ••] describes one of the first Arabidopsis leaf phenomic studies. The authors provide a view of the cellular behavior underlying leaf shape and size variations in a large collection of form mutants.
22. Ichikawa T., Nakazawa M., Kawashima M., Muto S., Gohda K., Suzuki K., Ishikawa A., Kobayashi H., Yoshizumi T., Tsumoto Y., et al. Sequence database of 1172 T-DNA insertion sites in Arabidopsis activation-tagging lines that showed phenotypes in T1 generation. Plant J 36 (2003) 421-429
23. Kuromori T., Wada T., Kamiya A., Yuguchi M., Yokouchi T., Imura Y., Takabe H., Sakurai T., Akiyama K., Hirayama T., et al. A trial of phenome analysis using 4000 Ds-insertional mutants in gene-coding regions of Arabidopsis. Plant J 47 (2006) 640-651
24. Ahn J.H., Kim J., Yoo S.J., Yoo S.Y., Roh H., Choi J.H., Choi M.S., Chung K.S., Han E.J., Hong S.M., et al. Isolation of 151 mutants that have developmental defects from T-DNA tagging. Plant Cell Physiol 48 (2007) 169-178
25. Chern C.G., Fan M.J., Yu S.M., Hour A.L., Lu P.C., Lin Y.C., Wei F.J., Huang S.C., Chen S., Lai M.H., et al. A rice phenomics study-Phenotype scoring and seed propagation of a T-DNA insertion-induced rice mutant population. Plant Mol Biol 65 (2007) 427-438
26. Sadok W., Naudin P., Boussuge B., Muller B., Welcker C., and Tardieu F. Leaf growth rate per unit thermal time follows QTL-dependent daily patterns in hundreds of maize lines under naturally fluctuating conditions. Plant, Cell Environ 30 (2007) 135-146. This paper describes an automated platform that allows phenomic analyses of maize plants.
27. Granier C., Aguirrezabal L., Chenu K., Cookson S.J., Dauzat M., Hamard P., Thioux J.J., Rolland G., Bouchier-Combaud S., Lebaudy A., et al. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytologist 169 (2006) 623-635. This paper describes an automated platform that allows phenomic analyses of Arabidopsis plants.
28. Walter A., Scharr H., Gilmer F., Zierer R., Nagel K.A., Ernst M., Wiese A., Virnich O., Christ M.M., Uhlig B., et al. Dynamics of seedling growth acclimation towards altered light conditions can be quantified via GROWSCREEN: A setup and procedure designed for rapid optical phenotyping of different plant species. New Phytologist 174 (2007) 447-455. This paper describes an automated platform that allows phenomic analyses of tobacco and Arabidopsis plants.
29. Alonso J.M., and Ecker J.R. Moving forward in reverse: genetic technologies to enable genome-wide phenomic screens in Arabidopsis. Nat Rev Genet 7 (2006) 524-536. An excellent review on the technologies that are setting the foundations of phenomics in Arabidopsis.
30. •] presents novel software tools specifically designed for leaf morphometry.
31. •] presents novel software tools specifically designed for leaf morphometry.
32. Bensmihen S., Hanna A.I., Langlade N.B., Micol J.L., Bangham A., and Coen E. Mutational spaces for leaf shape and size. Human Frontier Sci Prog J 2 (2008) 110-120. In this paper, variation in leaf shape and size in two large collections of mutants is quantitavely captured with an allometric space based on just three or four principal components.
33. Abramoff M.D., Magelhaes P.J., and Ram S.J. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Inter 11 (2004) 36-42
34. Lee K., Avondo J., Morrison H., Blot L., Stark M., Sharpe J., Bangham A., and Coen E. Visualizing plant development and gene expression in three dimensions using optical projection tomography. Plant Cell 18 (2006) 2145-2156
35. Schmid M., Davison T.S., Henz S.R., Pape U.J., Demar M., Vingron M., Schölkopf B., Weigel D., and Lohmann J.U. A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nat Genet 37 (2005) 501-506
36. Pérez-Pérez J.M., Serrano-Cartagena J., and Micol J.L. Genetic analysis of natural variations in the architecture of Arabidopsis thaliana vegetative leaves. Genetics 162 (2002) 893-915
37. El-Lithy M.E., Clerkx E.J.M., Ruys G.J., Koornneef M., and Vreugdenhil D. Quantitative trait locus analysis of growth-related traits in a new Arabidopsis recombinant inbred population. Plant Physiol 135 (2004) 444-458
38. Frary A., Fritz L.A., and Tanksley S.D. A comparative study of the genetic bases of natural variation in tomato leaf, sepal, and petal morphology. Theor Appl Genet 109 (2004) 523-533
39. Juenger T., Pérez-Pérez J.M., Bernal S., and Micol J.L. Quantitative trait loci mapping of floral and leaf morphology traits in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for modular genetic architecture. Evol Dev 7 (2005) 259-271
40. Street N.R., Skogström O., Sjödin A., Tucker J., Rodríguez-Acosta M., Nilsson P., Jansson S., and Taylor G. The genetics and genomics of the drought response in Populus. Plant J 48 (2006) 321-341
41. Jansen R.C., and Nap J.P. Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation. Trends Genet 17 (2001) 388-391
42. Keurentjes J.J., Koornneef M., and Vreugdenhil D. Quantitative genetics in the age of omics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11 (2008) 123-128
43. Tsuge T., Tsukaya H., and Uchimiya H. Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L) Heynh. Development 122 (1996) 1589-1600
44. Horiguchi G., Kim G.-T., and Tsukaya H. The transcription factor AtGRF5 and the transcription coactivator AN3 regulate cell proliferation in leaf primordia of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 43 (2005) 68-78
45. Narita N.N., Moore S., Horiguchi G., Kubo M., Demura T., Fukuda H., Goodrich J., and Tsukaya H. Overexpression of a novel small peptide ROTUNDIFOLIA4 decreases cell proliferation and alters leaf shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 38 (2004) 699-713
46. Nath U., Crawford B.C.W., Carpenter R., and Coen E. Genetic control of surface curvature. Science 299 (2003) 1404-1407
47. Crawford B.C.W., Nath U., Carpenter R., and Coen E.S. CINCINNATA controls both cell differentiation and growth in petal lobes and leaves of Antirrhinum. Plant Physiol 135 (2004) 244-253
48. Guo M., Thomas J., Collins G., and Timmermans M.C. Direct repression of KNOX loci by the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 complex of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20 (2008) 48-58
49. Nurmberg P.L., Knox K.A., Yun B.W., Morris P.C., Shafiei R., Hudson A., and Loake G.J. The developmental selector AS1 is an evolutionarily conserved regulator of the plant immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (2007) 18795-18800
50. Alonso-Cantabrana H., Ripoll J.J., Ochando I., Vera A., Ferrándiz C., and Martínez-Laborda A. Common regulatory networks in leaf and fruit patterning revealed by mutations in the Arabidopsis ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 gene. Development 134 (2007) 2663-2671
51. McHale N.A., and Koning R.E. PHANTASTICA regulates development of the adaxial mesophyll in Nicotiana leaves. Plant Cell 16 (2004) 1251-1262
52. Tattersall A.D., Turner L., Knox M.R., Ambrose M.J., Ellis T.H.N., and Hofer J.M.I. The mutant crispa reveals multiple roles for PHANTASTICA in pea compound leaf development. Plant Cell 17 (2005) 1046-1060
53. Waites R., and Hudson A. PHANTASTICA - A gene required for dorsoventrality of leaves in Antirrhinum majus. Development 121 (1995) 2143-2154
54. Waites R., Selvadurai H.R.N., Oliver I.R., and Hudson A. The PHANTASTICA gene encodes a MYB transcription factor involved in growth and dorsoventrality of lateral organs in Antirrhinum. Cell 93 (1998) 779-789
55. Kim M., McCormick S., Timmermans M., and Sinha N. The expression domain of PHANTASTICA determines leaflet placement in compound leaves. Nature 424 (2003) 438-443
56. Byrne M.E., Barley R., Curtis M., Arroyo J.M., Dunham M., Hudson A., and Martienssen R.A. Asymmetric leaves1 mediates leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis. Nature 408 (2000) 967-971
57. ••] demonstrates that several ribosomal proteins are required for a proper leaf dorsoventral patterning.
58. ••] demonstrates that several ribosomal proteins are required for a proper leaf dorsoventral patterning.
59. Van Lijsebettens M., Van der Haeghen R., De Block M., Bauw G., Villarroel R., and Van Montagu M. An S18 ribosomal protein gene copy at the Arabidopsis PFL locus affects plant development by its specific expression in meristems. EMBO J 13 (1994) 3378-3388
60. Lecuit T., and Le Goff L. Orchestrating size and shape during morphogenesis. Nature 450 (2007) 189-192
61. Meyerowitz E.M. Plant development: Local control, global patterning. Curr Opin Genet Dev 6 (1996) 475-479
62. Hemerly A., De Almeida Engler J., Bergounioux C., Van Montagu M., Engler G., Inze D., and Ferreira P. Dominant negative mutants of the Cdc2 kinase uncouple cell division from iterative plant development. EMBO J 14 (1995) 3925-3936
63. Smith L.G., Hake S., and Sylvester A.W. The tangled-1 mutation alters cell division orientations throughout maize leaf development without altering leaf shape. Development 122 (1996) 481-489
64. Tsukaya H. Interpretation of mutants in leaf morphology: Genetic evidence for a compensatory system in leaf morphogenesis that provides a new link between cell and organismal theories. Int Rev Cytol 217 (2002) 1-39
65. Tsukaya H. Leaf shape: genetic controls and environmental factors. Int J Dev Biol 49 (2005) 547-555
66. Ferjani A., Horiguchi G., Yano S., and Tsukaya H. Analysis of leaf development in fugu mutants of Arabidopsis reveals three compensation modes that modulate cell expansion in determinate organs. Plant Physiol 144 (2007) 988-999
67. De Veylder L., Beeckman T., Beemster G.T.S., Krols L., Terras F., Landrieu I., Van Der Schueren E., Maes S., Naudts M., and Inzé D. Functional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase Inhibitors of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13 (2001) 1653-1668
68. Anastasiou E., and Lenhard M. Growing up to one's standard. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10 (2007) 63-69
69. Tsukaya H. Controlling size in multicellular organs: Focus on the leaf. PLOS Biology 6 (2008) e174. This paper gives detail on the available observations, explanations and open questions on compensation.
70. Street N.R., Sjödin A., Bylesjö M., Gustafsson P., Trygg J., and Jansson S. A cross-species transcriptomics approach to identify genes involved in leaf development. BMC Genomics 9 (2008) 589