Breast-conservation treatment outcomes: A community hospital's experience

Breast Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 76-84

  Florentine, Barbara D ^a,b   Kaushal, Neal K ^c   Puig, Melissa R ^a   Sarda, Nayibe ^a   Senofsky, Greg ^a,d,e   Cooper, Brian T ^a   Black, Alexander ^a,e,f   Zimmerman, Robert ^a,g   Barstis, John ^a,e,f  

^a Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Breast Institute   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g Vantage Oncology   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conservation; Community hospital; Lumpectomy

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; HORMONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MOTIVATION; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58149295815     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: 15244741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00674.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 347 : 1227 32.
2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 347 : 1233 41.
3. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995 332 : 907 11.
4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005 365 : 1687 717.
5. American College of Surgeons. National Cancer Database benchmark reports: patterns of diagnosis and treatment for selected cancers diagnosed 1997-2001. Available at http://web.facs.org/ncdbbmr/ncdbbenchmarks.cfm ; accessed November 18, 2007.
6. Kini VR, White JR, Horwitz EM, et al. Long term results with breast-conserving therapy for patients with early stage breast carcinoma in a community hospital setting. Cancer 1998 82 : 127 33.
7. McCloskey SA, Botnick LE, Rose CR, et al. Long-term outcomes after breast conservation therapy for early stage breast cancer in a community setting. Breast J 2006 12 : 138 44.
8. Fedorcik GG, Sachs R, Goldfarb MA. Oncologic and Aesthetic Results Following Breast-Conserving Therapy with 0.5 cm Margins in 100 Consecutive Patients. Breast J 2006 12 : 208 11.
9. American College of Surgeons. National Cancer Database survival reports: Five year observed survival rates by AJCC stage of disease for selected cancers diagnosed in 1998 and 1999. Available at http://web.facs.org/ncdbr/survival8.cfm ; accessed December 20, 2007.
10. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 2000 36 : 1938 43.
11. Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, et al. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg 2005 75 : 940 7.
12. Morrow M, Keeney K, Scholtens D, et al. Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy: the importance of lobular histology. Cancer 2006 106 : 2563 8.
13. Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann of Surg Oncol 2007 14 : 1040 4.
14. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, et al. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 1994 74 : 1746 51.
15. Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KJ, et al. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR 2001 17 : 565 72.
16. Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg 2005 241 : 629 39.
17. Pendlebury SC, Ivanov O, Renwick S, et al. Long-term review of a breast conservation series and patterns of care over 18 years. J Surg 2003 73 : 577 83.
18. Stotter A, McNeese MD, Ames F, et al. Predicting the rate and extent of locoregional failure after breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer. Cancer 1989 64 : 2217 25.
19. Smitt M, Nowels K, Carlson R, et al. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003 57 : 979 85.