First the facts, then the values? Implicit normativity in evidence-based decision aids for shared decision-making

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

Volumn 102, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 415-420

  Molewijk, Bert ^a,b   Stiggelbout, Anne M ^b   Otten, Wilma ^b   Dupuis, Heleen M ^b   Kievit, Job ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision aids; Empirical ethics; Evidence based medicine; Implicit normativity; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149203594     PISSN: 18659217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2008.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Molewijk A. Risky business. Individualised evidence-based decision support and the ideal of patient autonomy. An integrated empirical ethics study [thesis]. Leiden University; 2006.
2. Stiggelbout AM, Molewijk AC, Otten W, van Bockel JH, Bruijninckx CMA, Van der Salm J, et al. The Impact of Individualized Evidence-Based Decision Support on Aneurysm Patients' Decision Making, Ideals of Autonomy, and Quality of Life. Medical Decision Making (in Press) 2008.
3. Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB, et al. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999;3(1): 1-156.
4. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Evidence-Based Patient Choice. Inevitable or Impossible? New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
5. Entwistle VA, Sheldon TA, Sowden A, Watt IS. Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998; 14(2): 212-25.
6. Moody HR, From informed consent to negotiated consent. In: Ethics in an aging society. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins university press; 1992. p, 158-83.
7. Schermer M. The different faces of autonomy, A study on patient autonomy in ethical theory and hospital practice. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam (thesis); 2001.
8. Schneider CE. The Practice of Autonomy, Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
9. Molewijk AC, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Anal 2003;11(1):69-92.
10. Molewijk AC, Stiggelbout AM, Dupuis HM, Kievit J. Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2004; 7(55):69.
11. Stiggelbout AM, Molewijk AC, Otten W, Timmermans DR, van Bockel JH, Kievit J. ideals of patient autonomy In clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients' and physicians' views. J Med Ethics 2004; 30(3):268-74.
12. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.
13. Steyerberg EW, Kievit J, de Mol Van Otterloo JC, van Bockel JH, Eljkemans MJ, Habbema JD, Perioperative mortality of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. A clinical prediction rule based on literature and individual patient data. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155( 18): 1998-2004.
14. Timmermans D, van Bockel H, Kievit J. Improving the quality of surgeons' treatment decisions: a comparison of clinical decision making with a computerised evidence based decision analytical model. Qual Health Care 2001;10(1):4-9.
15. Sanders GD, Hagerty CG, Sonnenberg FA, Hlatky MA, Owens DK. Distributed decision support using a web-based interface: prevention of sudden cardiac death. Med Decis Making 1999; 19(2): 157-66.
16. Timmermans D, Stiggelbout AM, Kievit J. Communicating individualized risk information to surgery patients: what is the best format and which risks should be given? Patient Education & Counseling 2003;54(3):255-63.
17. Akkersdljk GJM, Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: aspects of screening, University of Leiden; 2000, p. 1-145.
18. Tversky A, Kahneman D, Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992:297-323.
19. Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Wakker PP. Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility. Management Science 2001;47(1498): 1514.
20. Dickenson DL. Can Medical Criteria Settle Priority-Setting Debates? The Need for Ethical Analysis. Health Care Analysis 1999;7:131-7.