Evidence-informed patient choice: Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 212-225

  Entwistle, Vikki A ^a   Sheldon, Trevor A ^a   Sowden, Amanda ^a   Watt, Ian S ^a  

^a NHS Ctr Reviews and Dissemination   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE; INFORMED CONSENT; LAW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT RIGHT; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0031863927     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462300012204     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Altman, D. G. The scandal of poor medical research. British Medical Journal, 1994, 308, 283-84.
2. Audit Commission. What seems to be the matter? Communication between hospitals and patients. London: HMSO, 1993.
3. Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., et al. The effects of message framing on mammography utilisation. Health Psychology, 1995, 14, 178-84.
4. Barry, M. D., Fowler, F. J., Mulley, A. G., et al. Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Medical Care, 1995, 33, 771-82.
5. Bartholome, W. G. A revolution in understanding: How ethics has transformed health care decision making. Quality Review Bulletin, 1992 (January), 18, 6-11.
6. Blume, S. Methods to assess the social, ethical and legal impact of health care technologies. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the International Society of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, June 5, 1995.
7. Brett, A. S., & McCullough, L. B. When patients request specific interventions: Defining the limits of the physician's obligation. New England Journal of Medicine, 1986, 315, 1347-51.
8. Brock, D. W., & Wartinan, S. A. When competent patients make irrational choices. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 322, 1595-99.
9. Brody, D. S. The patient's role in clinical decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1980, 93, 718-22.
10. Cavaliere, D., Scorpiglione, N., Belfiglio, et al. Quality assessment of randomised clinical trials on medical treatment of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetic Nutrition and Metabolism, 1994, 7, 287-94.
11. Collee, J. On the dangers of media appeals to save sick children's lives. The Observer (Ufe), July 2, 1995, 62.
12. Deber, R. B., & Goel, V. Using explicit decision rules to manage issues of justice, risk and ethics in decision analysis: When is it rational not to maximise expected utility? Medical Decision Making, 1990, 10, 181-94.
13. Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992, 45, 941-50.
14. Department of Health. The Patient's Charter. London: HMSO, 1991.
15. Dowie, J. Evidenced based, cost effective and preference driven medicine: Decision analysis based medical decision making the prerequisite. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1996, 104-13.
16. Durant, J., Evans, G., & Thomas, G. Public understanding of science in Britain: The role of medicine in the popular representation of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1992, 1, 161-82.
17. Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. The public understanding of science. Nature, 1989, 340, 11-14.
18. Eraker, S. A., & Sox, H. Assessment of patients' preferences for therapeutic outcomes. Medical Decision Making, 1981, 1, 29-39.
19. Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992, 268, 2420-25.