Protective Creams

Cosmeceuticals and Active Cosmetics: Drugs Versus Cosmetics, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 293-306

  Fluhr, J W ^a   Praessler, J ^a   Elsner, Peter ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149191108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/NOE0824759438-20     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Leveque JL et al. Are Corneocytes elastic? Dermatologica 1988; 176(2):65–69.
2. Engelke M, et al. Effects of xerosis and ageing on epidermal proliferation and differ­entiation. Br J Dermatol 1997; 137(2):219–225.
3. Fluhr JW et al. Glycerol regulates stratum corneum hydration in sebaceous gland deficient (Asebia) mice. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 120(5):728–737.
4. Jokura Y et al. Molecular analysis of elastic properties of the stratum corneum by solid-state 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Invest Dermatol 1995; 104(5):806–812.
5. Denda M et al. Low humidity stimulates epidermal DNA synthesis and amplifies the hyperproliferative response to barrier disruption: implication for seasonal exacer­bations of inflammatory dermatoses. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111(5):873–878.
6. Sato J et al. Water content and thickness of the stratum corneum contribute to skin surface morphology. Arch Dermatol Res 2000; 292(8):412–417.
7. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Preventive measures in contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1997;15(4):661–665.
8. De Paepe K et al. Beneficial effects of a skin tolerance-tested moisturizing cream on the barrier function in experimentally-elicited irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44(6):337–343.
9. Chamlin SL et al. Ceramide-dominant barrier repair lipids alleviate childhood atopic dermatitis: changes in barrier functionprovide a sensitive indicator ofdisease activity. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47(2):198–208.
10. Billmann-Eberwein C et al. Modulation of atopy patch test reactions by topical treat­ment of human skin with a fatty acid-rich emollient. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2002; 15(2):100–104.
11. Blichmann CW, Serup J, Winther A. Effects of single application of a moisturizer: evaporation of emulsion water, skin surface temperature, electrical conductance, elec­trical capacitance, and skin surface (emulsion) lipids. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1989; 69(4):327–330.
12. Loden M. The increase in skin hydration after application ofemollients with different amounts of lipids. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1992; 72(5):327–330.
13. Fluhr JW, Vrzak G, Gloor M. Hydratisierender und die Steroidpenetration modifizierender Effekt von Harnstoff und Glycerin in Abhängigkeit von der verwendeten Grundlage. Z Hautkr 1998; 73:210–214.
14. Gloor M, Gehring W. Increase in hydration and protective function of horny layer by glycerol and a w/o emulsion: are these effects maintained during long-term use? Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44(2):123–125.
15. Loden M, Barany E. Skin-identical lipids versus petrolatum in the treatment of tape-stripped and detergent-perturbed human skin. Acta Dermatol Venereol 2000; 80(6):412–415.
16. Lehmann L et al. Stability and occlusitivity of dermatological ointments. H & G Zeitschrift für Hautkrankheiten 1997; 8:585–590.
17. Fluhr JW et al. Glycerol accelerates recovery of barrier function in vivo. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1999; 79(6):418–421.
18. Batt M, Fairhust E. Hydration of the stratum corneum. Int J Cosmet Sci 1986; 8:253–264.
19. Hara M, Ma T, Verkman AS. Selectively reduced glycerol in skin of aquaporin- 3-deficient mice may account for impaired skin hydration, elasticity, and barrier recovery. J Biol Chem 2002; 277(48):46616–46621.
20. Jemec GB, Na R, Wulf HC. The inherent capacitance of moisturising creams: a source of false positive results? Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2000; 13(3–4):182–187.
21. Elias PM, Feingold KR. Lipids and the epidermal water barrier: metabolism, regulation, and pathophysiology. Semin Dermatol 1992; 11(2):176–182.
22. Schurer NY, Elias PM. The biochemistry and function of stratum corneum lipids. Adv Lipid Res 1991; 24:27–56.
23. Feingold KR et al. Cholesterol synthesis is required for cutaneous barrier function in mice. J Clin Invest 1990; 86(5):1738–1745.
24. Holleran WM et al. Regulation of epidermal sphingolipid synthesis by permeability barrier function. J Lipid Res 1991; 32(7):1151–1158.
25. Mao-Qiang M, Elias PM, Feingold KR. Fatty acids are required for epidermal permeability barrier function. J Clin Invest 1993; 92(2):791–798.
26. Elias PM, Menon GK. Structural and lipid biochemical correlates of the epidermal permeability barrier. Adv Lipid Res 1991; 24:1 –26.
27. Menon GK, Feingold KR, Elias PM. Lamellar body secretory response to barrier disruption. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 98(3):279–289.
28. Fartasch M, Bassukas ID, Diepgen TL. Structural relationship between epidermal lipid lamellae, lamellar bodies and desmosomes in human epidermis: an ultrastruc­tural study. Br J Dermatol 1993; 128(1):1–9.
29. Mao-Qiang M et al. Exogenous nonphysiologic vs. physiologic lipids. Divergent mechanisms for correction of permeability barrier dysfunction. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131(7):809–816.
30. Menon GK et al. De novo sterologenesis in the skin. II. Regulation by cutaneous barrier requirements. J Lipid Res 1985; 26(4):418–427.
31. Ghadially R, Halkier-Sorensen L, Elias PM. Effects of petrolatum on stratum corneum structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26(3 Pt 2): 387–396.
32. Man MM et al. Optimization of physiological lipid mixtures for barrier repair. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106(5):1096–1101.
33. Yang L et al. Topical stratum corneum lipids accelerate barrier repair after tape stripping, solvent treatment and some but not all types of detergent treatment. Br J Dermatol 1995; 133(5):679–685.
34. Thornfeldt CR. Critical and optimal molar ratios of key lipids. In: Loden M, Maibach HI, eds. Dry Skin and Moisturizers: Chemistry and Function. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 2000:337–348.
35. Wigger-Alberti W, Krebs A, Elsner P. Experimental irritant contact dermatitis due to cumulative epicutaneous exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene: single and concurrent application. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143(3):551–556.
36. Grunewald A et al. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI, eds. Irritant Dermatitis: New Clinical and Experimental Aspects. Basel: Karger, 1995:187–197.
37. Wigger-Alberti W, Hinnen U, Elsner P. Predictive testing of metalworking fluids: a comparison of 2 cumulative human irritation models and correlation with epidemio­logical data. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36(1):14–20.
38. Wigger-Alberti W et al. Efficacy of protective creams in a modified repeated irritation test. Methodological aspects. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1998; 78(4):270–273.
39. Frosch PJ, Kurte A, Pilz B. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (III). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in humans. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29(3):113–118.
40. Frosch PJ et al. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (I). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28(2):94–100.
41. Frosch PJ, Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31(3):161–168.
42. Berndt U et al. Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42(2):77–80.
43. Wigger-Alberti W et al. Self-application of a protective cream. Pitfalls of occu­pational skin protection. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133(7):861–864.
44. De Paepe K, et al. Incorporation of ceramide 3B in dermatocosmetic emulsions: effect on the transepidermal water loss of sodium lauryl sulphate-damaged skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2000; 14(4):272–279.
45. Held E, Sveinsdottir S, Agner T. Effect of long-term use of moisturizer on skin hydration, barrier function and susceptibility to irritants. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1999; 79(1):49–51.
46. Gloor M et al. Triclosan, a topical dermatologic agent. In vitro and in vivo studies on the effectiveness of a new preparation in the New German Formulary. Hautarzt 2002; 53(11):724–729.
47. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Moisturizers in preventing irritant contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38(5):241–244.
48. Ramsing DW, Agner T. Preventive and therapeutic effects of a moisturizer. An experimental study of human skin. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1997; 77(5):335–337.
49. Watkinson A et al. Water modulation of stratum corneum chymotryptic enzyme activity and desquamation. Arch Dermatol Res 2001; 293(9):470–476.
50. Denda M et al. Low humidity stimulates epidermal DNA synthesis and amplifies the hyperproliferative response to barrier disruption: implication for seasonal exacerbations of inflammatory dermatoses. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111(5): 873–878.
51. Sato J, et al. Drastic decrease in environmental humidity decreases water-holding capacity and free amino acid content of the stratum corneum. Arch Dermatol Res 2001; 293(9):477–480.
52. Sato J, et al. Abrupt decreases in environmental humidity induce abnormalities in permeability barrier homeostasis. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 119(4):900–904.
53. Denda M, et al. Exposure to a dry environment enhances epidermal permeability barrier function. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111(5):858–863.
54. Fartasch M, Schnetz E, Diepgen TL. Characterization of detergent-induced barrier alterations—effect of barrier cream on irritation. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc 1998; 3(2):121–127.
55. Suskind RR. The present status of silicone protective creams. Ind Med Surg 1955; 24:413–416.
56. Marks R, Dykes PJ, Hamami I. Two novel techniques for the evaluation of barrier creams. Br J Dermatol 1989; 120(5):655–660.
57. Treffel P, Gabard B, Juch R. Evaluation of barrier creams: an in vitro technique on human skin. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1994; 74(1):7–11.
58. Tronnier H. Methodische Ansa¨tze zur Prü fung von Hautschutzmitteln. Dermatosen 1993; 41:100–107.
59. Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM, van Neste D. Histological assessment of skin damage by irritants: its possible use in the evaluation of a ‘barrier cream’. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 11(3):179–185.
60. Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM. Evaluation of the protective value of an antisolvent gel by laser Doppler flowmetry and histology. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13(1):14–19.
61. Frosch PJ et al. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (II). Ineffectiveness of a popular “skin protector” against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29(2):74–77.
62. Schluter-Wigger W, Elsner P. Efficacy of 4 commercially available PCs in the repetitive irritation test (RIT). Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34(4):278–283.
63. Wigger-Alberti W et al. Experimentally induced chronic irritant contact dermatitis to evaluate the efficacy of protective creams in vivo. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40(4):590–596.
64. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Effect of barrier creams: human skin in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35(2):92–96.
65. Jepsen JR, Sparre Jorgensen A, Kyst A. Hand protection for car-painters. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13(5):317–320.
66. Romaguera C et al. Formulation of a barrier cream against chromate. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13(2):49–52.
67. Wohrl S et al. A cream containing the chelator DTPA (diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid) can prevent contact allergic reactions to metals. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44(4):224–228.
68. Kimura M, Kawada A. Contact dermatitis due to trisodium ethylenediaminetetra­acetic acid (EDTA) in a cosmetic lotion. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41(6):341.
69. Elsner P, Wigger-Alberti W, Pantini G. Perfluoropolyethers in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis. Dermatology 1998; 197(2):141–145.
70. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Petrolatum prevents irritation in a human cumulative exposure model in vivo. Dermatology 1997; 194(3):247–250.
71. Blanken R, Nater JP, Veenhoff E. Protective effect of barrier creams and spray coat­ings against epoxy resins. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 16(2):79–83.
72. Schuppli R, Ziegler G. New possibilities of skin protection against metals. Z Haut Geschlechtskr 1967; 42(10):345–348.
73. Gawkrodger DJ, Healy J, Howe AM. The prevention of nickel contact dermatitis. A review of the use of binding agents and barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32(5):257–265.
74. Fullerton A, Menne T. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the effect of barrier gels in nickel contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32(2):100–106.
75. Menne T. Prevention of nickel allergy by regulation of specific exposures. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1996; 26(2):133–138.
76. Grevelink SA, Murrell DF, Olsen EA. Effectiveness of various barrier preparations in preventing and/or ameliorating experimentally produced toxicodendron dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 27(2 Pt 1):182–188.
77. Marks JG Jr et al. Prevention of poison ivy and poison oak allergic contact dermatitis by quaternium-18 bentonite. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33(2 Pt 1):212–216.
78. Bankova L et al. Influence of the galenic form of a skin-protective preparation on the application pattern assessed by a fluorescence method. Exogen Dermatol 2003; 1:313–318.
79. Wigger-Alberti W et al. Training workers at risk for occupational contact dermatitis in the application of PCs: efficacy of a fluorescence technique. Dermatology 1997; 195(2):129–133.
80. Goh CL. Cutting oil dermatitis on guinea pig skin (I). Cutting oil dermatitis and barrier cream. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24(1):16–21.
81. Boman A, Mellstrom G. Percutaneous absorption of 3 organic solvents in the guinea pig. (III). Effect of barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21(3):134–140.
82. Lauwerys RR, et al. The influence of two barrier creams on the percutaneous absorption of m-xylene in man. J Occup Med 1978; 20(1):17–20.
83. Boman A, Wahlberg JE, Johansson G. A method for the study of the effect of barrier creams and protective gloves on the percutaneous absorption of solvents. Dermatologica 1982; 164(3):157–160.
84. Gupta BN et al. Safety evaluation of a barrier cream. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 17(1):10–12.
85. Pinola A et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to coconut diethanolamide (cocamide DEA). Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29(5):262–265.
86. Lapachelle J. Efficacy of protective creams and/or gels. In: Elsner P et al., eds. Pre­vention of Contact Dermatitis. Basel: Karger, 1996:182–192.
87. Fowler JF Jr. Treatment of occupational dermatitis. In: Hogan DJ, ed. Occupational Skin Disorders. New York: Igaka-Shoin, 1994:104–111.
88. Hogan DJ. The prognosis of hand eczema. In: Menne´ T, Maibach HI, eds. Hand Eczema. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993:285–292.