Preventive measures in contact dermatitis

Clinics in Dermatology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 661-665

  Wigger Alberti, Walter ^a   Elsner, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; IRRITANT AGENT;

CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELAPSE; REVIEW; SKIN MANIFESTATION; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0030750674     PISSN: 0738081X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-081X(97)00001-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI. Prevention of contact dermatitis. In: Mellström GA, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, editors. Protective gloves for occupational use. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1994:7-9.
2. Mathias CG. Prevention of occupational contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23:742-8.
3. Lachapelle JM. Principles of prevention and protection in contact dermatitis (with special reference to occupational dermatology). In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 1995;695-702.
4. Williams HC. Relative and attributable risk and its relevance in the prevention of contact dermatitis. In: Eisner P, Lachapeile JM, Wahlberg JE, et al, editors. Prevention of contact dermatitis. Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1996;10-7.
5. Mize NK, Johnson JA, Hansch C. Quantitative structure-activity relationship and cytotoxicity. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Irritant dermatitis. New clinical and experimental aspects. Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1995:224-9.
6. Roguet R, Cohen C, Rougier A, et al. Measurement of proinflammatory mediator production by cultured keratinocytes. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Irritant-dermatitis. New clinical and experimental aspects. Curr Probl Dematol Basel: Karger, 1995:230-42.
7. Wilhelm KP. Irritant dermatitis: Experimental aspects. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Irritant dermatitis. Mew clinical and experimental aspects, Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1995:144-51.
8. Wigger-Aiberti W, Hinnen U, Eisner P. Predictive testing of metalworking fluids: a comparison of 2 cumulative human irritation models and correlation to epidemiological data. Contact Derm 1997;36:14-20.
9. Patrick E, Maibach HJ. Predictive assays: animal and man, and in vitro and in vivo. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 1995:705-47.
10. Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HQ. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membrane. J Phamacol Exp Ther 1944;82:377-90.
11. Klecak G, Geleick H, Frey JR. Screening of fragrance materials for allergenicity in the guinea pig. I. Comparison of four testing methods. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1977;28: 53-64.
12. Klecak G. Identification of contact allergens: predictive tests in animals. In: Marzulli FN and Maibach HI. Dermatotoxicology. New York: Hemisphere, 1982:200-19.
13. Maurer T, Thomann P, Weirich EG, et al. The optimization test in the guinea pig. A method for the predictive evaluation of the contact allergenicity of chemicals. Agents Actions 1975;5:174-79.
14. Maguire HC. The bioassay of contact dermatitis in the guinea pig. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1973;24:151-62.
15. Magnusson B, Kligman AM. The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J Invest Dermatol 1969;52:268-76.
16. Flyvholm MA. Prevention by exposure assessment. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, et al, editors. Prevention of contact dermatitis. Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1996:97-105.
17. Wall LM. Spot tests and chemical analyses tor allergen evaluation. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors: Textbook of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 1995:277-85.
18. Shore RN. Dimethylglyoxime stick test for easier detection of nickel. Arch Dermatol 1977;113:1734.
19. Feigl F, Anger V. Spot tests in inorganic analysis, Vol. 188. 6th ed: Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1972, p. 615.
20. Luck H, Jentsch G. Chromium dermatitis caused by epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis 1988;19:154.
21. Fregert S, Trulson L. Simple methods for demonstrating of epoxy resins of bisphenol A type. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4:69-72.
22. Bomann A, Mellström G. Percutaneous absorption of 3 organic solvents in the guinea pig (IV). Effect of protective gloves. Contact Dermatitis 21;260-6.
23. Graves CJ, Edwards C, Marks R. The occlusive effects of protective gloves on the barrier properties of the stratum corneum. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Irritant dermatitis. New clinical and experimental aspects. Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1995:87-94.
24. Goh CL. Occupational skin disease in Singapore: epidemiology and causative agents. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1987;16(2):303-5.
25. Henriksen H. Selection of materials for protective gloves. Polymer membranes for protection against contact with epoxy preparations. Copenhagen: Danish Directorate of Labour Inspection Services, 1982.
26. Darre E, Vedel P, Jensen JS. Skin protection against methyl methacrylate. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:236-8.
27. Rycroft RJG. Occupational contact dermatitis. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer, 1992:343-400.
28. Mellström GA, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI. Protective gloves for occupational use. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1994.
29. Estlander T, Jolanki R. How to protect the hands. Dermatol Clin 1988;6:105-14.
30. Korstanje C. Skin barrier creams: Concepts and properties of formulations. Clinical management of skin barrier problems. Yamanouchi Satellite Symposium 4th EADV Congress Oct 13, 1995:23-6.
31. Lachapelle JM. Efficacy of protective creams and/or gels. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, editors. Prevention of contact dermatitis. Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1996:182-92.
32. Romaguera C, Grimait F, Vilaplana J et al. Formulation of a barrier cream against chromate. Contact Dermatitis 1985;12:49-52.
33. Gawkrodger DJ, Healy J, Howe AM. The prevention of nickel contact dermatitis. A review of the use of binding agents and barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32: 257-65.
34. Fullerton A, Menné T. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the effect of barrier gels in nickel contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:100-6.
35. Menné T. Prevention of nickel dermatitis. Allergologie 1995;18:447.
36. Marks JG Jr, Fowler JF Jr, Sheretz EF, et al. Prevention of poison ivy and poison oak allergic contact dermatitis by quatemium-18 bentonite. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;33: 212-6.
37. Marks R, Dykes PJ, Hamami I. Two novel techniques for the evaluation of barrier creams. Br J Dermatol 1989;120: 655-60.
38. Treffel P, Gabard B, Juch R. Evaluation of barrier creams: an in vitro technique on human skin. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994;74:7-11.
39. Tronnier H. Methodische Ansätze zur Prüfung von Hautschutzmitteln. Dermatosen 1993;41:100-7.
40. Bomann A, Mellström G. Percutaneous absorption of 3 organic solvents in the guinea pig (III). Effect of barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 1989;21:134-40.
41. Goh CL. Cutting oil dermatitis on guinea pig skin (I). Cutting oil dermatitis and barrier cream. Contact Dermatitis 1991;24:16-21.
42. Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM, Van Neste D. Histological assessment of skin damage by irritants: its possible use in the evaluation of a 'barrier cream'. Contact Dermatitis 1984;11:179-85.
43. Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM. Evaluation of the protective value of an antisolvent gel by laser Doppler flowmetry and histology. Contact Dermatitis 1985;13:14-9.
44. Frosch PJ, Schulze DA, Hoffmann M, et al. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (I). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:94-100.
45. Frosch P, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, et al. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (II). Ineffectiveness of a popular "skin protector" against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29: 74-7.
46. Grunewald AM, Gloor M, Gehring W, et al. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Irritant dermatitis. New clinical and experimental aspects. Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1995:187-97.
47. Frosch P, Kurte A, Pilz B. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (III). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in humans. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29:113-8.
48. Frosch PJ, Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31:161-8.
49. Schlüter-Wigger W, Elsner P. Efficacy of 4 commercially available protective creams in the repetitive irritation test (RIT). Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:278-83.
50. Hannuksela M. Moisturizers in the prevention of contact dermatitis. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, et al, editors. Prevention of contact dermatitis. Curr Probl Dermatol Basel: Karger, 1996:214-20.
51. Hornstein OP, Bäurle G, Kienlein-Klatschka B. Prospektivstudie zur Bedeutung konstitutioneller Parameter für die Ekzemgenese im Friseurund Baugewerbe. Dermatosen 1985;33:43-9.
52. Diepgen TL, Fartasch M, Hornstein OP. Evaluation and relevance of atopic basic and minor features in patients with atopic dermatitis and in the general population. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1989;144:50-4.
53. Agner T. Skin susceptibility in uninvolved skin of hand eczema patients and healthy controls. Br J Dermatol 1991; 125(2):140-6.
54. Hogan DJ, Dannaker CJ, Lal S, Maibach HI. An international survey on the prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1990;38: 143-7.
55. Wigger-Alberti W, Maraffio B, Wernli M, et al. Self-application of a protective cream: pitfalls of occupational skin protection. Arch Dermatol (in press).
56. Fenske RA, Wong SM, Leffingwell JT, et al. A video imaging technique for assessing dermal exposure. II. Fluorescent tracer testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1986;47:771-5.
57. Wigger-Alberti W, Maraffio B, Wernli M, et al. Training workers at risk for occupational contact dermatitis in the application of protective creams: efficacy of a fluorescence technique (submitted).