Telehospice acceptance among providers: A multidisciplinary comparison

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 452-457

  Washington, Karla T ^a,d   Demiris, George ^b   Oliver, Debra Parker ^c   Day, Michele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c University of Missouri   (United States)

^d UMC   (United States)

Author keywords

End of life; Hospice; Technology; Technology acceptance model; Telehospice; Videophone

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPICE CARE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER LITERACY; COMPUTER USER TRAINING; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOSPICE CARE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT CARE TEAM; QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 58149137017     PISSN: 10499091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049909108322289     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Miller KE, Miller MM, Single N. Barriers to hospice care: family physicians' perspective. Hosp J. 1997 ; 12: 29-41.
2. Demiris G., Parker Oliver DR, Fleming DA, Edison K. Hospice staff attitudes toward telehospice. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2004 ; 21: 343-347.
3. Doolittle G. A cost measurement study for a home-based telehospice service. J Telemed Telecare. 2000 ; 6 (suppl 1). 193-195.
4. Doolittle G., Yaezel A., Otto F., Clemens C. Hospice care using home-based telemedicine systems. J Telemed Telecare. 1998 ; 4: 58-59.
5. Whitten P., Doolittle G., Mackert M. Telehospice in Michigan: use and patient acceptance. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2004 ; 21: 191-195.
6. Whitten P., Doolittle G., Mackert M. Providers' acceptance of telehospice. J Palliat Med. 2005 ; 8: 730-735.
7. Day M., Demiris G., Parker Oliver D., Courtney K., Hensel B. Exploring underutilization of videophones in hospice settings. Telemed J E Health. 2007 ; 13: 25-31.
8. Maudlin J., Keene J., Kobb R. A road map for the last journey: home telehealth for holistic end-of-life care. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2006 ; 23: 399-403.
9. Davis FD A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results [doctoral dissertation]. Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ; 1986.
10. Davis FD Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989 ; 13: 319-340.
11. Al-Gahtani S., King M. Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behav Inf Technol. 1999 ; 18: 277-297.
12. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Lieu Sheng OR, Tam KY Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicne technology. J Manag Inform Syst. 1999 ; 16: 91-112.
13. Yang H., Yoo Y. It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis Support Syst. 2004 ; 38: 19-31.
14. Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA Perceived usefulnesss, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly. 1992 ; 16: 227-247.
15. Hendrickson AR, Glorfeld K., Cronan TP On the repeated test-retest reliability of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: a comment. Decis Sci. 1994 ; 25: 655-667.
16. Segars AH, Grover A. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly. 1993 ; 17: 517-525.
17. The Last Acts Coalition. Means to a better end: a report on dying in America today. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/newsroom/feature.jsp?id=15788. Accessed February 28, 2008.
18. Kutner JS, Main DS, Westfall JM, Pace W. The practice-based research network as a model for end-of-life care research: challenges and opportunities. Cancer Control. 2005 ; 12: 186-195.
19. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS Using Multivariate Statistics. 5 th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon ; 2006.