Correlational cuing as a function of target complexity and target-flanker similarity

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 275-290

  Cohen, Asher ^a   Fuchs, Ahuva ^a   Bar Sela, Atara ^a   Brumberg, Yaron ^a   Magen, Hagit ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0033071811     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206888     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BERTELSON, P. (1963). S-R relationships and reaction time to new versus repeated signals in a serial task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 478-484.
2. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. CARLSON, K. A., & FLOWERS, J. H. (1996). Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 460-470.
4. COHEN, A., IVRY, R. B., RAFAL, R. D., & KOHN, C. (1995). Activating response codes by stimuli in the neglected visual field. Neuropsychology, 2, 165-173.
5. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. E. (1993). Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 693-703.
6. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. [E.] (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints on response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
7. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
8. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., & ERIKSEN, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing? Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 195-205.
10. FLOWERS, J. H., & SMITH, K. L. (1998). What is learned about nontarget items in simple visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 696-704.
11. GIBSON, E.J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12. KAHNEMAN, D., & TREISMAN, A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13. KORNBLUM, S. (1969). Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 76, 113-131.
14. LAVIE, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 451-468.
15. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
16. MILLER, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 419-434.
17. MILLER, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 270-288.
18. MORDKOFF, J. T. (1996). Selective attention and internal constraints: There is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies. In A. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 483-502). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. MORDKOFF, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 520-538.
20. PAQUET, L., & CRAIG, G. L. (1997). Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task. Memory & Cognition, 25, 182-189.
21. PAQUET, L., & LORTIE, C. (1990). Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 382-388.
22. PRINZMETAL, W., PRESTI, D. E., & POSNER, M. I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 361-369.
23. ROBERTSON, L. C. (in press). Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
24. SCHMIDT, P. A., & DARK, V. J. (1998). Attentional processing of "unattended" flankers: Evidence for a failure of selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 227-238.
25. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40-50.
26. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
27. VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1981). Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28. WOLFE, J. M., & BENNETT, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.
29. YANTIS, Y., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 135-149.