Benefits and losses: A qualitative study exploring healthcare staff perceptions of teamworking

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 127-130

  Baxter, S K ^a,b   Brumfitt, S M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b Railway Station   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COOPERATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL STAFF; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MEDICAL STAFF; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE TEAM; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 58149125531     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022277     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Department of Health. National service framework for older people, London: DOH, 2001.
2. Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guidelines for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2004.
3. Royal College of Physicians. National sentinel stroke audit. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2006
4. Smits S, Falconer J, Herrin J, et al. Patient-focussed rehabilitation team cohesiveness in veterans administration hospitals. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2003;84:1332-1338.
5. Strasser D, Falconer J, Herrin J, et al. Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2005;86:403-9.
6. Kennedy I. Learning from Bristol: Are we? London: The Healthcare Commission, 2006.
7. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection. Caring for people who have had a stroke: A follow up study. London: Commission of Healthcare Audit and Inspection, 2006.
8. Sulch D, Perez I, Melbourn A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of intergrated (managed) care pathway for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2000;31:1929-1934.
9. Royal College of Physicians. A multidisciplinary stroke audit. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2002.
10. Department of Health. The NHS workforce strategy. London: Stationery Office, 2000.
11. Enderby P. Teamworking in community rehabilitation. J Clin Nurs 2002;11:409-11.
12. Loxley A. Collaboration in health and welfare. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997.
13. McCallin A. Interdisciplinary practice - a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review. J Clin Nurs 2001;10:419-28.
14. Hyer K, Fairchild S, Abraham I, et al. Measuring attitudes related to interdisciplinary training: revisiting the Heinemann, Schmitt and Farrell ''attitudes towards health care teams scale.'' J Interprof Care 2000;14:249-58.
15. Deeter-Schmelz D, Kennedy K. Patient care teams and customer satisfaction: the role of team cohesion. J Serv Market 2003;17:666-84.
16. Davoli G, Fine L. Stacking the deck for success in interprofessional collaboration. Health Prom Pract 2004;5:266-70.
17. Glasby J, Lester H. Cases for change in mental health: partnership working in mental health services. J Interprof Care 2004;18:7-16.
18. Hall P, Weaver L. Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road. Med Educ 2001;35:867-75.
19. West M, Poulton B. Primary health care teams: in a league of their own. In: Pearson P, Spencer J, eds. Promoting teamwork in primary care. London: Arnold, 1997.
20. Geddes J, Chamberlain C. Home based rehabilitation for people with stroke: a comparative study of six community services providing co-ordinated multidisciplinary treatment. Clin Rehab 2001;15:589-99.
21. Mitchell P, Crittenden R. Interdisciplinary clinical education: evaluating outcomes of an evolving model. Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract 2001;4:3-6.
22. Yin R. Case study research. Design and methods. 2nd edn. London: Sage, 1994.
23. Keen J, Packwood T. Using case studies in health services and public policy research. In: Pope C, Mays N, eds. Qualitative research in health care London: BMJ Books, 2000.
24. Bechofer F, Patterson L. Principles of research design in the social sciences. London: Routledge, 2000.
25. Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd edn. London: Sage, 2002.
26. Berg B. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 3rd edn. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon, 1998.
27. Spencer L, Lewis J, O'Connor W. Analysis practices, principles and processes. In Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 2000.
28. Richards L. Using NVivo in qualitative research. Melbourne: QSR International, 2002.
29. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1967.
30. Atwal A. Discharge planning and multidisciplinary teamwork: an interprofessional battlefield. J Interprof Care 2004;18:79-80.
31. Hoopes D, Postrell S. Shared knowledge, ''glitches'' and product development performance. Strat Manage J 1999;20:837-65.
32. Department of Health. Reducing brain damage: faster access to better stroke care. London: National Audit Office, 2005.
33. Bristol Royal Infirmary. Learning from Bristol: the Report of the Public Inquiry into Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry 2001. Command Paper CMS207, 2001.
34. Lord Laming/Great Britain Home Office. The Victoria Climbie Inquiry. Report ofan inquiry by Lord Laming. London: DH Publications, Command Paper CMS730, 2003.
35. Alonso A, Baker D, Holtzman A, et al. Reducing medical error in the military health system: how can team training help. Hum Resource Manage Rev 2006;16:396-415.