Evaluating the relative importance of patch quality and connectivity in a damselfly metapopulation from a one-season survey

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 67-76

  Yamanaka, Takehiko ^a   Tanaka, Koichi ^a   Hamasaki, Kenji ^a   Nakatani, Yukinobu ^a   Iwasaki, Nobusuke ^a   Sprague, David S ^a   Bjørnstad, Ottar N ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; BIOLOGICAL SURVEY; CONNECTIVITY; DAMSELFLY; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; DISPERSAL; METAPOPULATION; VEGETATION COVER;

ANIMALIA; COPERA ANNULATA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 58149119372     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16722.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bjørnstad, O. N. Bolker, B. 2000. Canonical functions for dispersal-induced synchrony Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267 : 1787 1794.
2. Bjørnstad, O. N. Bascompte, J. 2001. Synchrony and second-order spatial correlation in host-parasitoid systems J. Anim. Ecol. 70 : 924 933.
3. Bjørnstad, O. N. Falck, W. 2001. Nonparametric spatial covariance functions: estimation and testing Environ. Ecol. Stat. 8 : 53 70.
4. Borcard, D. Legendre, P. 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices Ecol. Modell. 153 : 51 68.
5. Borcard, D. et al. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation Ecology 73 : 1045 1055.
6. Borcard, D. et al. 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales Ecology 85 : 1826 1832.
7. Burnham, K. P. Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
8. Calabrese, J. M. Fagan, W. F. 2004. A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics Front. Ecol. Environ. 2 : 529 536.
9. Dennis, R. L. H. Eales, H. T. 1997. Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation J. Insect Conserv. 1 : 167 176.
10. Dennis, R. L. H. et al. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint Oikos 102 : 417 426.
11. Dray, S. et al. 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM) Ecol. Modell. 196 : 483 493.
12. Fagan, W. F. Calabrese, J. M. 2006. Quantifying connectivity: balancing metric performance with data requirements Crooks, K. R. Sanjayan, M. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press 297 317.
13. Fincke, O. M. Hadrys, H. 2001. Unpredictable offspring survivorship in the damselfly, Megaloprepus coerulatus, shapes parental behavior, constrains sexual selection, and challenges traditional fitness estimates Evolution 55 : 762 772.
14. Fleishman, E. et al. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics Conserv. Biol. 16 : 706 716.
15. Gotelli, N. J. Taylor, C. M. 1999. Testing metapopulation models with stream-fish assemblages Evol. Ecol. Res. 1 : 835 845.
16. Gutiérrez, D. 2005. Effectiveness of existing reserves in the long-term protection of a regionally rare butterfly Conserv. Biol. 19 : 1586 1597.
17. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics J. Anim. Ecol. 63 : 151 162.
18. Hanski, I. Singer, M. C. 2001. Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations Am. Nat. 158 : 341 353.
19. Hanski, I. Ovaskainen, O. 2003. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes Theor. Popul. Biol. 64 : 119 127.
20. Hanski, I. et al. 1996. The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation Conserv. Biol. 10 : 578 590.
21. Harrison, S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42 : 73 88.
22. Harrison, S. Bruna, E. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22 : 225 232.
23. Havel, J. E. et al. 2002. Estimating dispersal from patterns of spread: spatial and local control of lake invasions Ecology 83 : 3306 3318.
24. Heikkinen, R. K. et al. 2005. New insights into butterfly-environment relationships using partitioning methods Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 272 : 2203 2210.
25. Hurvich, C. M. Tsai, C. L. 1989. Regression and time-series model selection in small samples Biometrika 76 : 297 307.
26. Kerlinger, F. N. Pedhazur, E. J. 1973. Multiple regression in behavioral research. Rinehart and Winston.
27. Krauss, J. et al. 2005. Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly Ecography 28 : 465 474.
28. Legendre, P. Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology. Elsevier.
29. Legendre, P. Anderson, M. J. 1999. Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments Ecol. Monogr. 69 : 1 24.
30. Legendre, P. et al. 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data Ecol. Monogr. 75 : 435 450.
31. Levin, S. A. et al. 2003. The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: a theoretical perspective Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34 : 575 604.
32. Levins, R. 1970. Extinction Lect. Notes Math. 2 : 75 107.
33. MacKenzie, D. I. et al. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one Ecology 83 : 2248 2255.
34. McPeek, M. A. 1989. Differential dispersal tendencies among Enallagma damselflies (Odonata) inhabiting different habitats Oikos 56 : 187 195.
35. Moilanen, A. 1999. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference Ecology 80 : 1031 1043.
36. Moilanen, A. 2004. SPOMSIM: software for stochastic patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics Ecol. Modell. 179 : 533 550.
37. Moilanen, A. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure Ecology 79 : 2503 2515.
38. Nagelkerke, N. J. D. 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination Biometrika 78 : 691 692.
39. Økland, R. H. 2003. Partitioning the variation in a plot-by-species data matrix that is related to n sets of explanatory variables J. Veg. Sci. 14 : 693 700.
40. Ozgul, A. et al. 2006. Effects of patch quality and network structure on patch occupancy dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot metapopulation J. Anim. Ecol. 75 : 191 202.
41. Peres-Neto, P. R. et al. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions Ecology 87 : 2614 2625.
42. Rouquette, J. R. Thompson, D. J. 2007. Patterns of movement and dispersal in an endangered damselfly and the consequences for its management J. Appl. Ecol. 44 : 692 701.
43. Shieh, G. 2001. The inequality between the coefficient of determination and the sum of squared simple correlation coefficients Am. Stat. 55 : 121 124.
44. Sugimura, M. et al. 1999. Dragonflies of the Japanese archipelago in color. Hokkaido Univ. Press.
45. Taylor, P. D. et al. 2006. Landscape connectivity: a return to the basic Crooks, K. R. Sanjayan, M. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press 29 43.
46. ter Braak, C. F. F. et al. 1997. The incident function approach to modeling of metapopulation dynamics Bascompte, J. Solé, R. V. Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Springer 230.
47. Thomas, C. D. 1991. Spatial and temporal variability in a butterfly population Oecologia 87 : 577 580.
48. Thomas, C. D. et al. 2002. Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 : 563 569.
49. Thomas, J. A. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 1791 1796.
50. Venables, W. N. Ripley, B. D. 1998. Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer.
51. Whittingham, M. J. et al. 2006. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behavior? J. Anim. Ecol. 75 : 1182 1189.
52. Yamamura, K. 1999. Transformation using (x+0.5) to stabilize the variance of populations Res. Popul. Ecol. 41 : 229 234.