The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 578-590

  Hanski, Ilkka ^a   Moilanen, Atte ^a   Pakkala, Timo ^a   Kuussaari, Mikko ^a  

^a Division of Population Biology   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED BUTTERFLY; GLANVILLE FRITILLARY; HABITAT PATCH; INCIDENCE FUNCTION MODEL; METAPOPULATION;

FINLAND;

LEPIDOPTERA; MELITAEA CINXIA; NYMPHALIDAE;

EID: 0029753709     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020578.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ackakaya, H. R. 1994. Ramas/GIS. Linking landscape data with population viability analysis. Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York.
2. Brown, J. H., and A. Kodric-Brown. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445-449.
3. Burgman, M. A., S. Ferson, and H. R. Ackakaya. 1993. Risk assessment in conservaton biology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
4. Caughley, G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:215-244.
5. Ehrlich, P., and A. Ehrlich. 1981. Extinction. Ballantine Books, New York.
6. Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Pages 17-38 in M. E. Gilpin and I. Hanski, editors. Metapopulation dynamics. Academic Press, London.
7. Hanski, I. 1994a. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:151-162.
8. Hanski, I. 1994b. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:131-135.
9. Hanski, I. 1994c. Spatial scale, patchiness and movement on land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 343:19-25.
10. Hanski I., and M. Gilpin. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Pages 3-16 in M. Gilpin and I. Hanski, editors. Metapopulation dynamics. Academic Press, London.
11. Hanski, I., and M. Kuussaari. 1995 Butterfly metapopulation dynamics. Pages 149-171 in P. Price and N. Cappuccino, editors. Population dynamics: new approaches and synthesis. Academic Press, London.
12. Hanski, L., and C. D. Thomas. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially realistic model applied to butterflies. Biological Conservaton 68:167-180.
13. Hanski, I., M. Kuussaari, and M. Nieminen. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Ecology 75:747-762.
14. Hanski, L., T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari, and G. Lei. 1995B. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72:21-28.
15. Harrison, S. 1994. Metapopulations and conservation. Pages 111-128 in P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb, editors. Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England.
16. Kuussaari, M., M. Nieminen, and I. Hanski. 1993. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary. Proceedings of the conference on ecology and conservation of butterflies. Abstracts. Keele University.
17. LaHaye, W. S., R. J. Gutiérrez, and H. R. Ackakaya. 1994. Spotted Owl metapopulation dynamics in southern California. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:775-785.
18. Lamberson, R. H., K. McKelvey, B. R. Noon, and C. Voss. 1992. A dynamic analysis of Northern Spotted Owl viability in a fragmented forest landscape. Conservation Biology 6:505-512.
19. Lawton, J. H., S. Nee, A. J. Letcher, and P. H. Harvey. 1994. Animal distributions: patterns and processes. Pages 31-58 in P. J. Edwards, R. M. May and N. R. Webb, editors. Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Science, Inc., Oxford, England.
20. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237-240.
21. Lindenmayer, D. B., and R. C. Lacy 1995a. Metapopulation viability of Leadbeater's possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri, in fragmented old-growth forests. Ecological Applications 5:164-182.
22. Lindenmayer, D. B., and R. C. Lacy 1995a. Metapopulation viability of arboreal marsupials in fragmented old-growth forests: comparison among species. Ecological Applications 5:183-199.
23. Marttila, O., T. Haahtela, H. Aarnio, and P. Ojalainen. 1990. Suomen päiväperhoset (Finnish butterflies). Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki.
24. May, R. M. 1991. The role of ecological theory in planning reintroductions of endangered species. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 62:145-163.
25. McKelvey, K., B. R. Noon, and R. H. Lamberson. 1992. Conservaton planning for species occupying fragmented landscapes: the case of the Northern Spotted Owl. Pages 424-450 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, editors. Biotic interactons and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
26. Moilanen, A., and I. Hanski. 1995. Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 64:141-144.
27. Nee, S. 1994. How populations persist. Nature 367:123-124.
28. Porter, K. 1983. Multivoltinism in Apanteles bignelli and the influence of weather on synchronization with its host Euphydryas aurinia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 34:155-162.
29. Sjögren Gulve, P., and C. Ray. 1996. Large-scale forestry extirpates the pool frog: Using logistic regression to model metapopulation dynamics. In D. R. McDullough, editor. Metapopulations and wildlife conservation & management. Island Press (in press).
30. Thomas, J. A., and D. J. Simcox. 1982. A quick method for estimating larval populations of Melitaea cinxia during surveys. Biological Conservation 22:315-322.
31. Wilson, E. O. 1988. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.