Comparison of Different Biomaterials for Glaucoma Drainage Devices: Part 2

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 118, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1081-1084

  Ayyala, Ramesh S ^a,b   Michelini Norris, B ^c   Flores, Ana ^c   Haller, Edward ^d   Margo, Curtis E ^e  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^e Watson Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; POLYPROPYLENE; SILICONE;

ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; EYE; GLAUCOMA; HISTOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033901338     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.118.8.1081     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Comparison of different biomaterials for the glaucoma drainage devices
2. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma
3. Biocompatibility of PMMA, silicone and Acrosof intraocular lenses: Randomized comparison of the cellular reaction on the anterior lens surface
4. Comparison of hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), Peldri II, and critical-point drying methods for scanning electron microscopy of biological specimens
5. Methods of controlling bleb fibrosis around draining implants
6. Clinical experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant