Influence of changing pulse repetition frequency on chemical and biological effects induced by low-intensity ultrasound in vitro

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 392-397

  Buldakov, Mikhail A ^a,b,c   Hassan, Mariame A ^a   Zhao, Qing Li ^a   Feril Jr , Loreto B ^e   Kudo, Nobuki ^f   Kondo, Takashi ^a   Litvyakov, Nikolai V ^b,c   Bolshakov, Mikhail A ^c,d   Rostov, Vladislav V ^d   Cherdyntseva, Nadejda V ^b   Riesz, Peter ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOYAMA   (Japan)

^b CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^c TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^d INSTITUTE OF HIGH CURRENT ELECTRONICS   (Russian Federation)

^e FUKUOKA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^f HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Apoptosis; Free radicals; Low intensity ultrasound; Modulation; Pulse repetition frequency (PRF); Sucrose hydrolysis

Indexed keywords

CELL DEATH; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; MODULATION; PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE; SUGAR (SUCROSE); ULTRASONICS;

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICALS; ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCES (EPR); HYDROXYL RADICAL FORMATION; LOW INTENSITY ULTRASOUND; OPTIMIZATION STUDIES; PULSE REPETITION FREQUENCIES; SUCROSE HYDROLYSIS; UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

FREE RADICALS;

SUCROSE;

ARTICLE; CELL KILLING; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASOUND; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

EID: 58149104135     PISSN: 13504177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Zarnitsyn V.G., and Prausnitz M.R. Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30 (2004) 527-538
2. Feril Jr. L.B., Ogawa R., Tachibana K., and Kondo T. Optimized ultrasound-mediated gene transfection in cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 97 (2006) 1111-1114
3. Rahim A., Taylor S.L., Bush N.L., ter Haar G.R., Bamber J.C., and Porter C.D. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 (2006) 1269-1279
4. Kondo T., Nishimura J., Kitagawa H., Umemura S., Tachibana K., and Toyosawa K. Optimization of enhancement of therapeutic efficacy of ultrasound: frequency-dependent effects on iodine formation from KI-starch solutions and ultrasound-induced killing of rat thymocytes. J. Med. Ultrasonics 30 (2003) 93-101
5. Feril Jr. L.B., Kondo T., Cui Z.G., Tabuchi Y., Zhao Q.L., Ando H., Misaki T., Yoshikawa H., and Umemura S. Apoptosis induced by the sonomechanical effects of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in a human leukemia cell line. Cancer Lett. 221 (2005) 145-152
6. Fang H.Y., Tsai K.C., Cheng W.H., Shieh M.J., Lou P.J., Lin W.L., and Chen W.S. The effects of power on-off durations of pulsed ultrasound on the destruction of cancer cells. Int. J. Hyperthermia 23 (2007) 371-380
7. Huber P., Jochle K., and Debus J. Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter. Phys. Med. Biol. 43 (1998) 3113-3128
8. Samuel S., Miller D.L., and Fowlkes J.B. The relationship of acoustic emission and pulse-repetition frequency in the detection of gas body stability and cell death. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 (2006) 439-447
9. In: Nyborg W.L. (Ed). Biological Effects of Ultrasound. Mechanisms (1985), Churchill Livivgstone 23-33 (Chapter 3)
10. Pitt W.G., Husseini G.A., and Staples B.J. Ultrasonic drug delivery-a general review. Expert Opin. Drug. Deliv. 1 (2004) 37-56
11. Woodcock J.P., and Connolly C.C. The effect of non-cavitating ultrasound on the hydrolysis of sucrose solutions. Acustica 21 (1969) 45-50
12. Sostaric J.Z., Miyoshi N., Riesz P., DeGraff W.G., and Mitchell J.B. N-Alkyl glucopyranosides completely inhibit ultrasound-induced cytolysis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 39 (2005) 1539-1548
13. Cravotto G., and Cintas P. Power ultrasound in organic synthesis: moving cavitational chemistry from academia to innovative and large-scale applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 (2006) 180-196
14. Feril Jr. L.B., and Kondo T. Biological effects of low intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved, and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound. J. Radiat. Res. 45 (2004) 479-489
15. Yu T., Wang Z., and Mason T.J. A review of research into the uses of low level ultrasound in cancer therapy. Ultrason. Sonochem. 11 (2004) 95-103
16. Lejbkowicz F., and Salzberg S. Distinct sensitivity of normal and malignant cells to ultrasound in vitro. Environ. Health Perspect. 105 Suppl. 6 (1997) 1575-1578
17. Lejbkowicz F., Zwiran M., and Salzberg S. The response of normal and malignant cells to ultrasound in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 19 (1993) 75-82
18. Claes L., and Willie B. The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 93 (2007) 384-398
19. Tata D.B., Dunn F., and Tindall D.J. Selective clinical ultrasound signals mediate differential gene transfer and expression in two human prostate cancer cell lines: LnCap and PC-3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 234 (1997) 64-67
20. Pan H., Zhou Y., Izadnegahdar O., Cui J., and Deng C.X. Study of sonoporation dynamics affected by ultrasound duty cycle. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31 (2005) 849-856
21. Hiraoka W., Honda H., Feril Jr. L.B., Kudo N., and Kondo T. Comparison between sonodynamic effect and photodynamic effect with photosensitizers on free radical formation and cell killing. Ultrason. Sonochem. 13 (2006) 535-542
22. {radical dot}H) by spin trapping. Journal of the American Chemical Society 104 (1982) 3537-3539
23. Makino K., Mossoba M.M., and Riesz P. Chemical effects of ultrasound on aqueous solutions. Formation of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen atoms. J. Phys. Chem. 87 (1983) 1369-1377
24. Henglein A. Sonochemistry: historical developments and modern aspects. Ultrasonics 25 (1987) 6-16
25. Coakley W.T., Bardsley D.W., and Grundy M.A. Cell manipulation in ultrasonic standing wave fields. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 44 (1989) 43-62
26. Hawkes J.J., Barrow D., Cefai J., and Coakley W.T. A laminar flow expansion chamber facilitating downstream manipulation of particles concentrated using an ultrasonic standing wave. Ultrasonics 36 (1998) 901-903
27. Dayton P.A., Morgan K.E., Klibanov A.L., Brandenburger G., Nightingale K.R., and Ferrara K.W. A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 44 (1997) 1264-1277
28. Kondo T., and Riesz P. Effect of ultrasound and ionizing radiation on a sterically hindered cyclic secondary amine: an ESR study. Rad. Res. 127 (1991) 11-18
29. Khanna S., Amso N.N., Paynter S.J., and Coakley W.T. Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz standing ultrasound wave. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 (2003) 1463-1470
30. Radel S., Gherardini L., McLoughlin A.J., Doblhoff-Dier O., and Benes E. Breakdown of immobilisation/separation and morphology changes of yeast suspended in water-rich ethanol mixtures exposed to ultrasonic plane standing waves. Bioseparation 9 (2000) 369-377
31. Kondo T., and Yoshii G. Effect of intensity of 1.2 MHz ultrasound on change of DNA synthesis of irradiated mouse L cells. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 11 (1985) 113-119