Ionic dialysance and the assessment of Kt/V: The influence of different estimates of V on method agreement

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 2276-2282

  Moret, Karin ^a   Beerenhout, Charles H ^a   van den Wall Bake, A Warmold L ^a   Gerlag, Paul G ^a   van der Sande, Frank M ^b   Leunissen, Karel M ^b   Kooman, Jeroen P ^b  

^a MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dialysis dose; Ionic dialysance; Kt V; Urea distribution volume; Variability

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE; CREATININE; POLYSULFONE; UREA;

ADULT; AGED; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD VOLUME; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIALYSATE; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT DURATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WEIGHT GAIN;

FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; IONS; KIDNEY; KINETICS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; UREA;

EID: 34547843590     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm108     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Held P, Levin N, Bovbjerg RR, Pauly MV, Diamond LH. Mortality and duration of hemodialysis treatment. J Am Med Assoc 1991; 265: 871-875 i: 307-310
2. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37 [1 Suppl 1]: S7-S64
3. European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association. Section II Haemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17 [Suppl 7]: 16-31
4. Kloppenburg W, Stegeman C, Hooyschuur M, van der Ven J, de Jong PE, Huisman RM. Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 1961-1969
5. McIntyre CW, Lambie SH, Taal MW, Fluck RJ. Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: Intra-patient variability of delivered treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 559-63
6. Petitclerc T, Béné B, Jacobs C, Jaudon MC, Goux N. Non-invasive monitoring of effective dialysis dose delivered to the dialysis patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10: 212-216
7. Lindsay R, Bene B, Goux N, Heidenheim A, Landgren C, Sternby J. Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during haemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: 565-574
8. Mercadal L, Ridel C, Petitclerc T. Ionic dialysance: Principle and review of its clinical relevance for quantification of hemodialysis efficiency. Hemodial Int 2005; 9: 111-9
9. Di Filippo S, Andrulli S, Manzoni C, Corti M, Locatelli F. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose. Kidney Int 1998; 54:263-267
10. Manzoni C, Di Filippo S, Corti M, Locatelli F. Ionic dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 2023-2030
11. Mercadal L, Petitclerc T, Jaudon MC, Béné B, Goux N, Jacobs C. Is Ionic dialysance a valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency? Artif Organs 1998; 22: 1005-1009
12. Di Filippo S, Manzoni C, Andrulli S et al. Ionic dialysance allows an adequate estimate of urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 786-91
13. Wuepper A, Tattersall J, Kraemer M, Wilkie M, Edwards L. Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring. 1: Kidney Int 2003; 64: 2262-71
14. Lambie SH, Taal MW, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW. Analysis of factors associated with variability in haemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 406-12
15. Gotch FA, Panlilio FM, Buyaki RA, Wang EX, Folden TI, Levin NW. Mechanisms determining the ratio of conductivity clearance to urea clearance. Kidney Int Suppl 2004 Jul; (89): S3-24
16. Bosetto A, Bene B, Petitclerc T. Sodium management in dialysis by conductivity. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1999; 6: 243-54
17. Watson P, Watson I, Batt R. Total body water volumes for adult male and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 1980; 33: 27-39
18. Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Depner TA, Chumlea C, Rocco MJ, Chertow GM; Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group. Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: Effects of age, race, and gender. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1108-19
19. Depner TA: Prescribing Hemodialysis: A Guide to Urea Modeling, Appendix B, Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991, Boston
20. Daugirdas JT, Smye SW. Effect of a two compartment distribution on apparent urea distribution volume. Kidney Int 1997; 51: 1270-1273
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986: 307-310
22. Kuhlmann U, Goldau R, Samadi N, Graf T, Gross M. Accuracy and safety of online clearance monitoring based on conductivity variation. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 2001; 16: 1053-1058
23. Racki S, Zaputovic L, Maleta et al. Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: Comparison to standard method of urea removal. Ren Fail 2005; 27: 601-4
24. Mercadal L, Montcel S, Jaudon M et al. Ionic dialysance vs. urea clearance in the absence of cardiopulmonary recirculation. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 2002; 17: 106-111
25. Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Depner TA, Gotch FA, Star RA and the Hemodialysis (HEMO) study group. Relation between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume. Kidney Int 1999; 56: 1928-1933