Reduction in urea distribution volume over time in clinically stable dialysis patients

Kidney International

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 754-759

  Di Filippo, S ^a   Andrulli, S ^a   Mangano, S ^b   Baragetti, I ^c   Masa, A ^d   Di Filippo, G ^e   Mura, C ^f   Nachtigal, J ^g   Baruffaldi, M ^h   Barbisoni, F ⁱ   Cravero, R ^j   Agliata, S ^k   Amar, K ^l   Faranna, P ^m   Locatelli, F ^a  

^a A MANZONI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Azienda Ospedaliera S Antonio Abate di Gallarate   (Italy)

^c Ospedale Bassini   (Italy)

^d Azienda Ospedaliera Della Valtellina e Valchiavenna   (Italy)

^e SAN GERARDO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN DONATO   (Italy)

^g Ospedale S Maria del Prato   (Italy)

^h CARLO POMA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

ⁱ TREVIGLIO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^j OSPEDALE DEGLI INFERMI   (Italy)

^k Ospedale SS Trinita   (Italy)

^l Ospedale di Legnano   (Italy)

^m BOLOGNINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

Dialysis dose; Ionic dialysance; Kt V; Lean body mass; Nutritional status; Urea distribution volume

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; C REACTIVE PROTEIN; HEMOGLOBIN; UREA;

ADULT; AGED; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; BODY WEIGHT; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; KINETICS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; UREA BLOOD LEVEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALBUMINURIA; BODY WEIGHT; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; KIDNEY; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL DIALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; UREA;

EID: 32544453404     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000149     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCOS). Kidney Int 1985; 28: 526-534.
2. Hakim RM, Breyer J, Ismail N, Schulman G. Effects of dose of dialysis on morbidity and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 23: 661-669.
3. Parker TF, Husni L, Huang W et al. Survival of hemodialysis in the U.S. is improved with a greater quantity of dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 23: 670-680.
4. Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA et al. The dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 550-556.
5. Sargent JA, Gotch FA. Mathematical modeling of dialysis therapy. Kidney Int Suppl 1980; 10: 2-10.
6. Pedrini L, Zereik S, Rasmy S. Causes, kinetics and clinical implications of post-hemodialysis urea rebound. Kidney Int 1988; 34: 817-824.
7. Smye SW, Dunderdale E, Brownridge G, Will E. Estimation of treatment dose in high-efficiency haemodialysis. Nephron 1994; 67: 24-29.
8. Daugirdas JT, Schneditz D. Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency (K/V) by regional blood flow and conventional two-pool urea kinetic analyses. ASAIO J 1995; 41: 719-724.
9. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis Suppl 2001; 1: 7-64.
10. European Best Practice Guidelines for Haemodialysis (Part 1). Nephrol Dial Transplant Suppl 2002; 7: 17-31.
11. Depner TA. Quantifying hemodialysis. Am J Nephrol 1996; 16: 17-28.
12. Coyne D, Delmez J, Spence G, Windus D. Impaired delivery of hemodialysis prescriptions: an analysis of causes and an approach to evaluation. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8: 1315-1318.
13. Kloppenburg W, Stegeman C, Hooyschuur M et al. Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 1961-1969.
14. McIntyre C, Lambie S, Taal M, Fluck R. Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: intra-patient variability of delivered treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 559-562.
15. Manzoni C, Di Filippo S, Corti M, Locatelli F. Ionic dialysance as a method for on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 2023-2030.
16. Mercadal L, Petitclerc T, Jaudon MC et al. Is ionic dialysance a valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency? Artif Organs 1998; 22: 1005-1009.
17. Petitclerc T, Goux N, Reynier AL et al. A model for non-invasive estimation of in-vivo dialyzer performances and patient's conductivity during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs 1993; 16: 585-591.
18. Polaschegg HD. Automatic non-invasive intradialytic clearance measurement. Int J Artif Organs 1993; 16: 185-191.
19. Di Filippo S, Andrulli S, Manzoni C et al. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 263-267.
20. Di Filippo S, Manzoni C, Andrulli S et al. Ionic dialysance allows an adequate estimate of urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 786-791.
21. Goldau R, Kuhlmann U, Samadi N et al. Ionic dialysance measurement is urea distribution volume dependent: a new approach to better results. Artif Organs 2002; 26: 321-332.
22. Owen Jr WF, Lew NL, Liu Y et al. The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1001-1006.
23. Dumler F. Hypoalbuminemia is a marker of overhydration in chronic maintenance patients on dialysis. ASAIO J 2003; 49: 282-286.
24. Gotch FA. Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis. In: Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Gentile DE (eds). Clinical Dialysis. Appleton & Lange: Norwalk, CT, 1992, pp 118-146.