Rapid perceptual switching of a reversible biological figure

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 12, 2008, Pages

  Jackson, Stuart ^a   Cummins, Fred ^a   Brady, Nuala ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OPTOKINETIC STIMULATION; ROTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WALKING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXERCISE TEST; MALE; MOTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXERCISE TEST; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; WALKING;

EID: 58049083309     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003982     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blake R, Fox R (1974) Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature 249: 488-490.
2. Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N (1998) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21: 753-759.
3. Dodd JV, Krug K, Cumming BG, Parker AJ (2001) Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT. J Neurosci 21: 4809-4821.
4. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 1-11.
5. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cogn Sci 3: 254-264.
6. Van Ee R (2005) Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vis Res 45: 29-40.
7. Suzuki S, Grabowecky M (2007) Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing. Neuron 56: 741-753.
8. Carter O, Cavanagh P (2007) Onset rivalry: brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE 2: e343.
9. Johansson G (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14: 201-211.
10. Downing PE, Jiang Y, Shuman M, Kanwisher N (2001) A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293: 2470-2473.
11. Bonda E, Petrides M, Ostry D, Evans A (1996) Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J Neurosci 16: 3737-3744.
12. Grossman E, Donnelly M, Price R, Pickens D, Morgan V, et al. (2000) Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 711-720.
13. Giese MA, Poggio T (2003) Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 179-192.
14. Kourtzi Z, Krekelberg B, Van Wezel RJA (2008) Linking form and motion in the primate brain. Trends Cogn Sci 12: 230-236.
15. Wallach H, O'Connell DN (1953) The kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psych 45: 205-217.
16. Necker LA (1832) Observations on some remarkable optical phenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Lond Edinburgh Phil Magazine J Sci 1: 329-337.
17. Vanrie J, Dekeyser M, Verfaillie K (2004) Bistability and biasing effects in the perception of ambiguous point-light walkers. Perception 33: 547-560.
18. Watson TL, Pearson J, Clifford CWG (2004) Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Curr Biol 14: 1670-1674.
19. Vanrie J, Verfaillie K (2004) Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions. Behav Res Meth Instr & Comp 36: 625-629.
20. Vanrie J, Verfaillie K (2004) Vanrie-BRMIC-2004.zip. Available: Psychonomic Society Web Archive, http://www.psychonomic.org/archive/. Accessed 2008 Sep 18.
21. Hupe JM, Rubin N (2003) The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vis Res 43: 531-548.
22. Brouwer GJ, Van Ee R (2006) Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics. Vis Res 46: 3393-3402.
23. Van Dam LCJ, Van Ee R (2006) Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. J Vis 6: 1172-1179. http://journalofvision.org/6/11/3/, doi:10.1167/6.11.3.
24. Van Dam LCJ, Van Ee R (2006) The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vis Res 46: 787-799.
25. Beintema JA, Oleksiak A, Van Wezel RJA (2006) The influence of biological motion perception on structure-from-motion interpretations at different speeds. J Vis 6: 712-726. http://journalofvision.org/6/7/4/, doi:10.1167/6.7.4.
26. Brouwer GJ, Van Ee R (2007) Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. J Neurosci 27: 1015-1023.
27. Nawrot M, Blake R (1991) A neural network model of kinetic depth. Vis Neurosci 6: 219-227.
28. Fang F, He S (2004) Stabilized structure from motion without disparity induces disparity adaptation. Curr Biol 14: 247-251.
29. Nawrot M, Blake R (1991) The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Percept Psychophys 49: 230-244.
30. Brainard DH (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
31. Cornelissen FW, Peters EM, Palmer J (2002) The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with Matlab and the Psychophysics Toolbox. Behav Res Meth Instr & Comp 34: 613-617.
32. Engbert R, Kliegl R (2003) Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vis Res 43: 1035-1045.
33. Brascamp JW, Van Ee R, Pestman WR, Van den Berg AV (2005) Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. J Vis 5: 287-298. http://journalofvision.org/5/4/1/, doi:10.1167/5.4.1.
34. Mamassian P, Landy MS (1998) Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vis Res 38: 2817-2832.