Enhancing the precision and spatial acuity of point quadrat analyses via calibrated exposure mapping

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 425-431

  Meyers, James M ^a   Vanden Heuvel, Justine E ^a,b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Department of Horticultural Sciences ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Biomass distribution; Canopy management; Light attenuation; Light interception; Shoot thinning

Indexed keywords

EID: 57949093324     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Dokoozlian, N.K., and W.M. Kliewer. 1995a. The light environment within grapevine canopies. I. Description and seasonal changes during fruit development. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:209-218.
2. Dokoozlian, N.K., and W.M. Kliewer. 1995b. The light environment within grapevine canopies. II. Influence of leaf area density on fruit zone light environment and some canopy assessment parameters. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:219-226.
3. Downey, M.O., N.K. Dokoozlian, and M.P. Krstic. 2006. Cultural practice and environmental impacts on the flavonoid composition of grapes and wine: A review of recent research. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 57:257-268.
4. Gladstone, E.A., and N.K. Dokoozlian. 2003. Influence of leaf area density and trellis/training system on the microclimate within grapevine canopies. Vitis 42:123-131.
5. Hashizume, K., and T. Samuta. 1999. Grape maturity and light exposure affect berry methoxypyrazine concentration. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:194-198.
6. Lee, S., M. Seo, M. Riu, J.P. Cotta, D.E. Block, N.K. Dokoozlian, and S.E. Ebeler. 2007. Vine microclimate and norisoprenoid concentration in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 58:291-301.
7. Reynolds, A.G., and D.A. Wardle. 1989. Influence of fruit microclimate on monoterpene levels of Gewürztraminer. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 40:149-154.
8. Reynolds, A.G., D.A.Wardle, and M. Dever. 1994. Shoot density effects on Riesling grapevines: Interactions with cordon age. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:435-443.
9. Reynolds, A.G., D.A. Wardle, and A.P. Naylor. 1996. Impact of training system, vine spacing, and basal leaf removal on Riesling. Vine performance, berry composition, canopy microclimate, and vineyard labor requirements. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 47:63-76.
10. Schultz, H.R. 1995. Grape canopy structure, light microclimate and photosynthesis. I. A two-dimensional model of the spatial distribution of surface area densities and leafages in two canopy systems. Vitis 34:211-215.
11. Smart, R.E. 1985. Principles of grapevine canopy microclimate manipulation with implications for yield and quality. A review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36:230-239.
12. Smart, R.E., and M. Robinson. 1991. Sunlight into Wine: A Handbook for Winegrape Canopy Management. Winetitles, Adelaide.
13. Tarara, J.M., J.C. Ferguson, G.A. Hoheisel, and J.E. Perez Pena. 2005. Asymmetrical canopy architecture due to prevailing wind direction and row orientation creates an imbalance in irradiance at the fruiting zone of grapevines. Agric. For. Meteorol. 135:144-155.