Comparing the scientific quality achieved by funding instruments for single grant holders and for collaborative networks within a research system: Some observations

Scientometrics

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 145-164

  Rigby, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849159123     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1970-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. J. D. Adams G. C. Black J. R. Clemmons P. E. Stephan 2005 Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999 Research Policy 34 259 285
2. Austrian Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (2004), Austrian Science Fund Yearbook, 2003, Vienna.
3. T. Banchoff 2002 Institutions, inertia and European Union research policy Journal of Common Market Studies 40 1 21
4. A. Bonaccorsi C. Daraio 2005 Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity Scientometrics 63 87 120
5. E. A. Corley P. C. Boardman B. Bozeman 2006 Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies Research Policy 35 975 993
6. H. Dundar D. R. Lewis 1998 Determinants of research productivity in higher education Research in Higher Education 39 607 631
7. Elliott, J. M. (1977), Some Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Samples of Benthic Invertebrates (2nd ed.). Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication: 25, Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, England.
8. E. Etzkowitz L. Leydesdorff 2000 The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations Research Policy 29 109 123
9. K. Frenken 2002 A new indicator of European integration and an application to collaboration in scientific research Economic Systems Research 14 345 361
10. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.
11. J. Golden F. V. Carstensen 1992 Academic research, productivity, department size and organization: further results, rejoinder Economics of Education Review 11 169 171
12. E. Hackett 2005 Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research Social Studies of Science 35 787 826
13. J. Hakala P. Kutinlahti E. Kaukonen 2002 Becoming international, becoming European: EU research collaboration at Finnish universities The European Journal of Social Science Research 15 357 379
14. P. Jeffrey 2003 Smoothing the waters: observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration Social Studies of Science 25 539 562
15. J. S. Katz B. R. Martin 1997 What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26 1 18
16. S. Kyvik 1995 Are big university departments better than small ones? Higher Education 30 295 304
17. S. Lee B. Bozeman 2005 The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity Social Studies of Science 35 673 702
18. L. Leydesdorff S. Bensman 2006 Classification and power laws: The logarithmic transformation Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 1470 1486
19. R. M. May 1997 The scientific wealth of nations Science 275 793 796
20. G. Melin 2000 Pragmatism and self-organisation: Research collaboration on the individual level Research Policy 29 31 40
21. G. W. Milligan 1987 The use of the Arc-Sine Transformation in Analysis of Variance Educational and Psychological Measurement 47 563 573
22. Narin, F., Whitlow, E. S. (1990), Measurement of Scientific Cooperation and Co-authorship in EC-related Areas of Science. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. EC-Report EUR 12900.
23. D. Price de Solla D. D. Beaver 1966 Collaboration in an invisible college American Psychologist 21 1011 1018
24. Quenouille, M. H. (1953), The Design and Analysis of Experiments, Griffin, London.
25. J. Rigby J. E. Edler 2005 Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality Research Policy 34 784 794
26. G. Schatz 2003 Networks, fretworks Febs Letters 553 1 2
27. G. Schatz 2004 Letting go FEBS Letters 576 285 286
28. G. Schatz 2005 The risks of playing safe FEBS Letters 579 569 570
29. Scientific Council of the European Research Council (2006 a), European Research Council - Work Programme 2007 Draft Version, 13 October 2006.
30. Scientific Council of the European Research Council (2006 b), The ERC Launch Strategy.
31. Sheffe, H. (1959), The Analysis of Variance, John Wiley, London.
32. Stankiewicz, R. (1979), The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance, In: Andrews, F. M. (Ed.). Scientific Productivity. The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. Cambridge/Paris, Cambridge University Press/UNESCO.
33. A. F. J. Van Raan 1998 The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results Some simple mathematical considerations concerning. The role of self-citations Scientometrics 42 423 428
34. A. F. J. Van Raan 2004 Sleeping Beauties in science Scientometrics 59 467 472
35. C. S. Wagner 2005 Six case studies of international collaboration in science Scientometrics 62 3 26
36. E. Welsh M. Jirotka D. Gavaghan 2006 Post-genomic science: cross-disciplinary and large-scale collaborative research and its organizational and technological challenges for the scientific research process Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A - Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 364 1533 1549
37. Whitley, R. (2000), The Intellectual and Social Organisation of the Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd Edition.
38. Ziman, J. M. (1994), Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. H. Zuckerman 1967 Nobel laureates in science: Patterns of productivity, collaboration and authorship American Sociological Review 32 391 403