Visualizing the sequential process of knowledge elaboration in computer-supported collaborative problem solving

Computers and Education

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 509-519

  Ding, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Cooperative collaborative learning; Gender studies; Secondary education

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MECHANICS;

CASE STUDIES; COLLABORATION PATTERNS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNINGS; COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE/COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; GENDER STUDIES; INDIVIDUAL KNOWLEDGES; NEWTONIAN MECHANICS; ONLINE INTERACTIONS; PHYSICS PROBLEMS; SECONDARY EDUCATION; SECONDARY SCHOOLS; SEQUENTIAL PROCESSES; STRUCTURED PROBLEMS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 57849152885     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baker M. Argumentation and constructive interaction. In: Coirier P., and Andriessen J. (Eds). Foundations of argumentative text processing (1999), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 179-202
2. Brown A.L., and Palincsar A.S. Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In: Resnick L.B. (Ed). Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 395-451
3. Chang K.E., Sung Y.T., and Lee C.L. Web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 1 (2003) 56-69
4. Cohen E.G. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 64 1 (1994) 1-35
5. De Corte E., Verschaffel L., Entwistle N., and Van Merriënboer J. Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (2003), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
6. De Jong T., and Ferguson-Hessler M.G.M. Het leren van exacte vakken. In: Tomic W., and Span P. (Eds). Onderwijspsychologie. Beïnvloeding, verloop en resultaten van leerprocessen (1993), Lemma BV, Utrecht 331-351
7. Dillenbourg P., Baker M., Blay A., and O'Malley C. The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: Spada H., and Reimann P. (Eds). Learning in humans and machines. Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (1995), Pergamon, Oxford 189-211
8. In: Dillenbourg P. (Ed). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (1999), Pergamon, Elsevier, Amsterdam
9. Ding N., and Harskamp E. How partner gender influences female students' problem solving in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 5 (2006) 331-343
10. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (1998). Human-computer interaction (2nd ed.).
11. Erkens, G. (1997). Coöperatief probleemoplossen met computers in het onderwijs. Dissertation. Utrecht University [Cooperative problem solving with computers in education].
12. Harskamp E., and Ding N. Structured collaboration versus individual learning in solving physics problems. International Journal of Science Education 28 14 (2006) 1669-1688
13. Heller P., Keith R., and Anderson S. Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. American Association of Physics Teachers 60 7 (1992) 627-636
14. Hertz-Lazarowitz R. Understanding students' interactive behaviour: Looking at six mirrors of the classroom. In: Hertz-Lazarowitz R., and Miller N. (Eds). Interaction in cooperative groups: The anatomy of group learning (1992), Cambridge Press, New York 71-102
15. Howe C.J., Tolmie A., Duchak-Tanner V., and Rattray C. Hypothesis testing in science. Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10 (2000) 361-391
16. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. 4th ed. (1994), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA
17. King A. Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In: O'Donnell A., and King A. (Eds). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 87-115
18. Kumpulainen K., and Mutanen M. The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction 9 5 (1999) 449-473
19. Lehtinen E. Computer-supported collaborative learning: An approach to powerful learning environments. Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (2003), Pergamon 35-53
20. Lemke J.L. Talking science: Language, learning and values (1990), Ablex, Norwood, NJ
21. Miyake, N. (2006). Designed collaboration as a scaffold for schematic knowledge integration. In Mizoguchi, R., Dillenbourg, P., & Zhu, Z. (Eds.), Learning by effective utilization of technologies facilitating intercultural understanding. Proceeding of international conference on computers in education (ICCE 2006) (pp. 15-20). Beijing, China.
22. Nelson M.L. Collaborative problem solving. In: Reigeluth C. (Ed). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory Vol. II (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ 241-267
23. Roschelle J., and Teasley S.D. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O'Malley C.E. (Ed). Computer supported collaborative learning (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 69-197
24. Sizmur S., and Osborne J. Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping. International Journal of Science Education 19 10 (1997) 1117-1135
25. Stahl G. Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/mit/ Available from
26. Stahl G., Koschmann T., and Suthers D. Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In: Sawyer R.K. (Ed). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
27. Suthers D.D. Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1 3 (2006) 315-337
28. Teasley S. The role of talk in children's peer collaboration. Developmental Psychology 3 2 (1995) 207-220
29. Van Boxtel, C. (2000). Collaborative concept learning. Collaborative learning task, student interaction, and the learning of physics concepts. Doctoral dissertation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Print Partners Ipskamp.
30. Van Boxtel C. Studying peer interaction from three perspectives. In: van der Linden J.L., and Renshaw P. (Eds). Dialogic learning: Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching (2004), Kluwer, Dordrecht 125-143
31. Van der Meijden H., and Veenman S. De invloed van groepsgrootte en schooltype op het elaboratiegedrag van leerlingen in een CSCL-omgeving. Paper presented at the 32nd Education Research Day 2005, Gent, Belgium, 30 May-1 June, 2005. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 22 (2005) 2049-2067
32. Webb N.M. Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In: Hertz-Lazarowitz R., and Miller N. (Eds). Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (1995), Cambridge University Press, NY
33. Webb N.M., and Farivar S. Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In: O'Donnell A., and King A. (Eds). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 117-149