Hydrophobe-water interactions: Methane as a model

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 95, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 4241-4245

  Despa, F ^a,b   Berry, R S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHANE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; HYDROPHOBICITY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING;

HYDROPHOBICITY; METHANE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; WATER;

EID: 57849142600     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.137216     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Frauenfelder, H., S. G. Sligar, and P. G. Wolynes. 1991. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science. 254:1598-1603.
2. Anfinsen, C. B. 1973. Principles that govern folding of protein chains. Science. 181:223-230.
3. Dill, K. A. 1990. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 29:7133-7155.
4. Mattos, C., and D. Ringe. 2001. Proteins in organic solvents. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:761-764.
5. Fernandez, A., and R. S. Berry. 2002. Extent of hydrogen-bond protection in folded proteins: a constraint on packing architectures. Biophys. J. 83:2475-2481.
6. Shea, J. E., J. N. Onuchic, and C. L. Brooks 3rd. 2002. Probing the folding free energy landscape of the Src-SH3 protein domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:16064-16068.
7. Garcia, A. E., and J. N. Onuchic. 2003. Folding a protein in a computer: an atomic description of folding/unfolding of protein A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:13898-13903.
8. Huang, X., C. J. Margulis, and B. J. Berne. 2003. Dewetting-induced collapse of hydrophobic particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:11953-11958.
9. Despa, F., A. Fernandez, and R. S. Berry. 2004. Dielectric modulation of biological water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:228104.
10. Papoian, G. A., J. Ulander, M. P. Eastwood, Z. Luthey-Schulten, and P. G. Wolynes. 2004. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:3352-3357.
11. Chandler, D. 2005. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature. 437:640-647.
12. Liu, P., X. Huang, R. Zhou, and B. J. Berne. 2005. Observation of a dewetting transition in the collapse of the melittin tetramer. Nature. 437:159-162.
13. Zong, C., G. A. Papoian, J. Ulander, and P. G. Wolynes. 2006. Role of topology, nonadditivity, and water-mediated interactions in predicting the structures of α/β proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128:5168-5176.
14. Despa, F., and R. S. Berry. 2007. The origin of the long-range attraction of hydrophobes in water. Biophys. J. 92:373-378.
15. Lin, M. S., N. L. Fawzi, and T. Head-Gordon. 2007. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a salvation function for protein structure prediction. Structure. 15:727-740.
16. Cheung, M. S., A. E. Garcia, and J. N. Onuchic. 2002. Protein folding mediated by salvation: water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:685-690.
17. Ball, P. 2008. Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem. Rev. 108:74-108.
18. Duan, Y., and P. A. Kollman. 1998. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solutions. Science. 282:740-744.
19. Mirny, L., and E. Shakhnovich. 2001. Protein folding theory: from lattice to all-atom models. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:361-396.
20. Daggett, V., and A. Fersht. 2003. The present view of the mechanism of protein folding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:497-502.
21. Head-Gordon, T., J. M. Sorenson, A. Pertsemlidis, and R. M. Glaeser. 1997. Differences in hydration structure near hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acids. Biophys. J. 73:2106-2115.
22. Hura, G., J. M. Sorenson, R. M. Glaeser, and T. Head-Gordon. 1999. Solution X-ray scattering as a probe of hydration-dependent structuring of aqueous solutions. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 17:97-118.
23. Pertsemlidis, A., A. M. Saxena, A. K. Soper, T. Head-Gordon, and R. M. Glaeser. 1996. Direct evidence for modified solvent structure within the hydration shell of a hydrophobic amino acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:10769-10774.
24. Pertsemlidis, A., A. K. Soper, J. M. Sorenson, and T. Head-Gordon. 1999. Evidence for microscopic, long-range hydration forces for a hydrophobic amino acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:481-486.
25. Sorenson, J. M., G. Hura, A. K. Soper, A. Pertsemlidis, and T. Head-Gordon. 1999. Determining the role of hydration forces in protein folding. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:5413-5426.
26. Crivelli, S., E. Eskow, B. Bader, V. Lamberti, R. Byrd, R. Schnabel, and T. Head-Gordon. 2002. A physical approach to protein structure prediction. Biophys. J. 82:36-49.
27. Rick, S. W., and B. J. Berne. 1997. Free energy of the hydrophobic interaction from molecular dynamics simulations: the effect of solute and solvent polarizability. J. Phys. Chem. B. 101:10488-10493.
28. Sceats, M. G., and S. A. Rice. 1982. Water: A Comprehensive Treatise. Vol. 7. F. Franks, editor. Plenum Press, New York.
29. Frank, H. S., and M. W. Evans. 1945. Free volume and entropy in condensed systems III. entropy in binary liquid mixtures; partial molal entropy in dilute solutions; structure and thermodynamics in aqueous electrolytes. J. Chem. Phys. 13:507-532.
30. Blokzijl, W., and J. B. F. N. Engberts. 1993. Hydrophobic effects. Opinions and facts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 32:1545-1579.
31. Jensen, M. Ø., O. G. Mouritsen, and G. H. Peters. 2004. The hydrophobic effect: molecular dynamics simulations of water confined between extended hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 120:9729-9744.
32. Pangali, C., M. Rao, and B. J. Berne. 1979. Monte-Carlo simulation of the hydrophobic interaction. J. Chem. Phys. 71:2975-2980.
33. Lum, K., D. Chandler, and J. D. Weeks. 1999. Hydrophobicity at small and large length scales. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:4570-4577.
34. ten Wolde, P. R., and D. Chandler. 2002. Drying-induced hydrophobic polymer collapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:6539-6543.
35. Graziano, G. 1998. On the size dependence of hydrophobic hydration. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 94:3345-3352.
36. Kauzmann, W. 1959. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 14:1-63.
37. Rick, S. W., S. J. Stuart, and B. J. Berne. 1994. Dynamical fluctuating charge force fields: application to liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 101:6141-6156.
38. Chipot, C., B. Maigret, J. L. Rivail, and H. A. Scheraga. 1992. Determination of net atomic charges from ab initio self-consistent-field molecular electrostatic properties. J. Phys. Chem. 96:10276-10284.
39. Lee, C. Y., J. A. McCammon, and P. J. Rossky. 1984. The structure of liquid water at an extended hydrophobic surface. J. Chem. Phys. 80:4448-4455.
40. Paschek, D. 2004. Temperature dependence of the hydrophobic hydration and interaction of simple solutes: an examination of five popular water models. J. Chem. Phys. 120:6674-6690.
41. Bresme, F., and A. Wynveen. 2007. On the influence of solute polarizability on the hydrophobic interaction. J. Chem. Phys. 126:044501.
42. Gong, H., G. Hocky, and K. F. Freed. 2008. Influence of nonlinear electrostatics on transfer energies between liquid phases: charge burial is far less expensive than Born model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. In press.
43. Pashley, R. M., P. M. McGuiggan, B. Ninham, and D. F. Evans. 1985. Attractive forces between uncharged hydrophobic surfaces: direct measurements in aqueous solution. Science. 229:1088-1089.
44. Tsao, Y.-H., D. F. Evans, and H. Wennerström. 1993. Long-range attractive force between hydrophobic surfaces observed by atomic force microscope. Science. 262:547-550.
45. Meyer, E. E., Q. Lin, T. Hassenkam, E. Oroudjev, and J. N. Israelachvili. 2005. Origin of the long-range attraction between surfactant-coated surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:6839-6842.
46. Pettitt, B. M., and M. Karplus. 1985. The potential of mean force surface for the alanine dipeptide in aqueous solution: a theoretical approach. Chem. Phys. Lett. 121:194-201.
47. Choudhury, N., and B. M. Pettitt. 2007. The dewetting transition and the hydrophobic effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:4847-4852.