A paediatric interactive therapy system for arm and hand rehabilitation

2008 Virtual Rehabilitation, IWVR

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 127-132

  Pyk, Pawel ^a   Wille, David ^b   Chevrier, Edith ^a   Hauser, Yves ^a   Holper, Lisa ^a   Fatton, Ismael ^a   Greipl, Roger ^a   Schlegel, Sonja ^b   Ottiger, Luzia ^b   Rückriem, Bärbel ^b   Pescatore, Aniña ^a   Meyer Heim, Andreas ^b   Kiper, Daniel ^a   Eng, Kynan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEDIATRICS; SENSORS; TRACKING (POSITION); VIRTUAL REALITY; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

BEND SENSORS; CAMERA TRACKING; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENTS; HAND REHABILITATIONS; HARDWARE COMPONENTS; INTERACTIVE GAMINGS; INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL REALITIES; LARGE RANGES; PHYSICAL DESIGNS; PILOT STUDIES; POSITION SENSING DEVICES; TECHNICAL DETAILS; UPPER ARMS; VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEMS;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

EID: 57849093613     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICVR.2008.4625148     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Johansson, B., Functional and cellular effects of environmental enrichment after experimental brain infarcts. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2004. 22(3-5): p. 163-74.
2. Rose, F., D. Johnson, and E. Attree, Rehabilitation of the head-injured child: basic research and new technology. Pediatr Rehabil, 1997. 1(1): p. 3-7.
3. McComas, J., J. Pivik, and M. Laflamme, Current uses of virtual reality for children with disabilities. Stud Health Technol Inform, 1998.58(161-169).
4. Sveistrup, H., et al., Outcomes of intervention programs using flatscreen virtual reality. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2004. 7(4856-8).
5. Harris, K-. and D. Reid, The influence of virtual reality play on children's motivation. Can J Occup Ther, 2005. 72(1): p. 21-29.
6. Reid, D., Benefits of a virtual play rehabilitation environment for children with cerebral palsy on perceptions of self-efficacy: a pilot study. Pediatr Rehabil, 2002. 5(3): p. 141-148.
7. Chen, Y., et al., Use of virtual reality to improve upper-extremity control in children with cerebral palsy: a single-subject design. Phys Ther, 2007. 87(11): p. 1441-57.
8. Campbell, M., The rehabilitation of brain injured children: the case for including physical exercise and virtual reality: a clinical perspective. Pediatr Rehabil, 2002. 5(1): p. 43-45.
9. Grealy, M. and D. Heffernan, The rehabilitation of brain injured children: the case for including physical exercise and virtual reality. Pediatr Rehabil, 2000. 4(2): p. 41-49.
10. Cho, B., et al., The effect of virtual reality cognitive training for attention enhancement. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2002. 5(2): p. 129-37.
11. Sik Lányi, C., et al., Developing multimedia software and virtual reality worlds and their use in rehabilitation and psychology. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2004. 105(273-84).
12. van der Eerden, W., et al., CAREN-Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment. Stud Health Technol Inform, 1999. 62(373-8).
13. Bryanton, C., et al., Feasibility, motivation, and selective motor control: virtual reality compared to conventional home exercise in children with cerebral palsy. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2006. 9(2): p. 123-128.
14. You, S., et al., Cortical reorganization induced by virtual reality therapy in a child with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2005. 47(9): p. 628-35.
15. Reid, D., The influence of virtual reality on playfulness in children with cerebral palsy: a pilot study. Occup Ther Int, 2004. 11(3): p. 131-44.
16. Rizzolatti, G. and L. Craighero, The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2004. 27: p. 169-192.
17. Rizzolatti, G., et al., Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 1999. 3(2): p. 131-142.
18. Fadiga, L., et al., Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol, 1995. 73(6): p. 2608-2611.
19. Kohler, E., et al., Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 2002. 297: p. 846-848.
20. Lepage, J. and H. Théoret, The mirror neuron system: grasping others' actions from birth? Dev Sci, 2007. 10(5): p. 513-23.
21. Pfeifer, J., et al., Mirroring others' emotions relates to empathy and interpersonal competence in children. Neuroimage, 2007. in print.
22. Fecteau, S., et al., A motor resonance mechanism in children? Evidence from subdural electrodes in a 36-month-old child. NeuroReport, 2004. 15(17): p. 2625-7.
23. Oberman, L., et al., EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 2005. 24(2): p.190-8.
24. Ertelt, D., et al., Action Observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage, 2007. 36(Supple2): p. T164-173.
25. Eng, K., et al., Interactive visuo-motor therapy system for stroke rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2007. 9: p. in press.
26. Grygorenko, V., Magnetic Compass with Tilt Compensation, in Cypress Application Note AN2272. 2005.
27. Bourke-Taylor, H., Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function: construct validity and correlation with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Develop Med Child Neurol, 2003. 45: p. 92-96.
28. Randall, M., et al., Reliability of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function. Develop Med Child Neurol, 2001. 43: p. 761-767.
29. MaThiowetz, V., et al., Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1985. 39(6): p. 386-391.
30. Smith, Y.A., E. Hong, and C. Presson, Normative and validation studies of the Nine-hole Peg Test with children. Percept Mot Skills, 2000. 90(3 Part 1): p. 823-843.
31. Oxford Grice, K., et al., Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2003. 57(5): p. 570-573.