Resolving boundaries between species in Sphagnum section Subsecunda using microsatellite markers

Taxon

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1189-1200

  Karlin, Eric F ^a   Boles, Sandra B ^b   Shaw, A Jonathan ^b  

^a RAMAPO COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Australia; Duplicated loci; Microsatellites; New Zealand; Phenotypic variation; Polyploidy; Section Subsecunda; Sphagnum

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; DISJUNCT DISTRIBUTION; ENDEMIC SPECIES; GAMETOPHYTE; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; MORPHOLOGY; MOSS; PHENOTYPE; POLYPLOIDY;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; NEW ZEALAND;

SPHAGNUM; SPHAGNUM NOVO-ZELANDICUM; SPHAGNUM SIMPLEX; SUBSECUNDA;

EID: 57749200499     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.574012     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson, L.E., Shaw, J. & Shaw, B. In press. Peat Mosses of the Southeastern United States. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
2. Bartlett, J.K. 1984. New or interesting records of mosses from New Zealand. Natl. Mus. New Zealand Rec. 2: 181-189.
3. Beever, J., Allison, K.W. & Child, J. 1992. The Moss Flora of New Zealand, ed. 2. University of Otago Press, Dunedin.
4. Bruford, M.W. & Wayne, R.K. 1993. Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Curr. Opin. Genet. & Devel. 3: 939-943.
5. Catcheside, D.G. 1980. Mosses of South Australia. D.J. Woolman, Government Printer, Adelaide.
6. Ciofi, C., Milinkovitch, M.C., Gibbs, J.P., Caccone, A. & Powell, J.R. 2002. Microsatellite analysis of genetic divergence among populations of giant Galapagos tortoises. Molec. Ecol. 11: 2265-2283.
7. Cronberg, N. 1998. Population structure and interspecific differentiation of the peat moss sister species Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillifolium (Sphagnaceae) in northern Europe. Pl. Syst. Evol. 209: 139-58.
8. Crum, H. 1984. Sphagnopsida (Sphagnaceae). North American Flora, ser. II, part 11. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
9. Crum, H. & Anderson, L.E. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America. Columbia University Press, New York.
10. Daniels, R.E. & Eddy, A. 1985. Handbook of European Sphagna. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon.
11. Dewoody, J., Nason, J.D. & Hipkins, V.D. 2006. Mitigating scoring errors in microsatellite data from wild populations. Molec. Ecol. Notes 6: 951-957.
12. Dieringer, D. & Schlötterer, C. 2002. Microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Molec. Ecol. Notes 3: 167-169.
13. Dobson, A.T. 1975. Sphagnum subnitens, S. squarrosum, and Drepanocladus revolvens in New Zealand mires. New Zealand J. Bot. 13: 16-171.
14. Eddy, A. 1977. Sphagnales of Tropical Asia. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) 5: 359-445.
15. Eddy, A. 1988. A Handbook of Malesian Mosses, vol. 1, Sphagnales to Dicranales. British Museum (Natural History), London.
16. Excoffier, L., Laval, G. & Schneider, S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinformatics Online 1: 47-50.
17. Fife, A.J. 1996. A synopsis of New Zealand Sphagna, with a description of S. simplex sp. nov. New Zealand J. Bot. 34: 309-328.
18. Flatberg, K.I. 1994. Norwegian Sphagna. A Field Colour Guide. Universitetet i Trondheim, Vitenskapsmuseet Rapport Botanisk Serie 1994-3. Vitenskapsmuseet, Trondheim, Norway.
19. Gupta, P.K. & Varshney, R.K. 2000. The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113: 16-185.
20. Karlin, E.F. 2006. Update on the distribution and ecology of Sphagnum portoricense. Bryologist 109: 541-550.
21. Karlin, E.F. & Andrus, R.E. 2006. Update on Sphagnum perichaetiale in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 44: 421-444.
22. Karlin, E.F., Boles, S.B. & Shaw, A.J. 2008. Systematics of Sphagnum section Sphagnum in New Zealand: a microsatellite-based analysis. New Zealand J. Bot. 45: 105-118.
23. Lexer, C., Kremer, A. & Petit, R.J. 2006 Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molec. Ecol. 15: 2007-2012.
24. Long, D.G., Paton, J.A., Squirrell, J., Woodhead, M. & Hollingsworth, P.M. 2006. Morphological, ecological and genetic evidence for distinguishing Anastrophyllum joergensenii Schiffn. and A. alpinum Steph. (Jungermanniopsida: Lophoziaceae). J. Bryol. 28: 108-117.
25. McQueen, C.B. & Andrus, R.E. 2007. Sphagnaceae. Pp. 45-101 in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.), Flora of North America North of Mexico, vol. 27, Bryophyta: Mosses, part 1. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
26. Muir, G. & Schlötterer, C. 2005. Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Molec. Ecol. 14: 54-561.
27. Newman, T.K., Fairbanks, L.A., Pollack, D. & Rogers, F. 2002. Effectiveness of human microsatellite loci for assessing paternity in a captive colony of vervets (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus). Amer. J. Primatol. 56: 237-243.
28. Peakall, R. & Smouse, P.E. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molec. Ecol. Notes. 6: 288-295.
29. Provan, J. & Wilson, P.J. 2007. Development of microsatellites for the peat moss Sphagnum capillifolium using ISSR cloning. Molec. Ecol. Notes 7: 254- 256.
30. Queller, D.C., Strassman, J.E. & Hughes, C.R. 1993. Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 285-288.
31. Ramel, C. 1997. Mini- and microsatellites. Environm. Health Perspect. 105: 781-789.
32. Roy, M.S., Gefen, E., Smith, J.D., Ostander, E.A. & Wayne, R.K. 1994. Patterns of differentiation and hybridization in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Molec. Biol. Evol. 11: 553-570.
33. Sainsbury, G.O.K. 1955. A Handbook of New Zealand Mosses, Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand 5. Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington.
34. Såstad, S.M., Stenoien, H.K. & Flatberg, K.I. 1999. Species delimitation and relationships of the Sphagnum recurvum complex (Bryophyta) as revealed by isozyme and RAPD markers. Syst. Bot. 24: 95-107.
35. Schlötterer, C. 2000. Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma 109: 365-371.
36. Scott, G.A.M., Stone, I.G. & Rosser, C. 1976. The Mosses of Southern Australia. Academic Press, London.
37. Selkoe, K.A. & Toonen, R.J. 2006. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol. Lett. 9: 615-629.
38. Seppelt, R.D. 2006. Sphagnaceae. Fl. Australia 51: 89-104.
39. Seppelt, R.D. & Crum, H.A. 1999. Sphagnum fuscovinosum, a new species from Australia. Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 22: 132-134.
40. Shaw, A.J., Cox, C.J. & Boles, S.B. 2003. Polarity of peatmoss (Sphagnum) evolution: who says mosses have no roots? Amer. J. Bot. 90: 1777-1787.
41. Shaw, A.J., Cao, T., Wang, L.S., Flatberg, K.I., Flatberg, B., Shaw, B., Zhou, P., Boles, S. & Terracciano, S. 2008. Genetic variation in three Chinese peat mosses based on microsatellite markers, with primer information and analysis of ascertainment bias. Bryologist 111: 271-281.
42. Shaw, A.J., Melosik, I., Cox, C.J. &. Boles S.B. 2005. Divergent and reticulate evolution in closely related species of Sphagnum section Subsecunda. Bryologist 108: 363-376.
43. Sliwinska, E., Krzakpwa, M. & Melosik, I. 2000. Estimation of ploidy level in four Sphagnum species (Subsecunda section) by flow cytometry. Pp. 137-150 in: Krzakpwa, M. & Melosik, I. (eds.), The Variability in Polish Populations of Sphagnum Taxa (Subsecunda Section), According to Morphological, Anatomical, and Biochemical Traits. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe S.C., Poznan, Poland.
44. Taberlet, P., Waits, L.P. & Luikart, G. 1999. Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 323-327.
45. Temsch, E.M., Greilhuber, J. & Krisai, R. 1998. Genome size in Sphagnum (peat moss). Bot. Acta 111: 325-330.
46. Thingsgaard, K. 2002. Taxon delimitation and genetic similarities of the Sphagnum imbricatum complex, as revealed by enzyme electrophoresis. J. Bryol. 24: 3-15.
47. Van der Velde, M., During, H.J., Van de Zande, L. & Bijlsma, R. 2001a. The reproductive biology of Polytrichum formosum: clonal structure and paternity revealed by microsatellites. Molec. Ecol. 10: 2423-2434.
48. Van der Velde, M, Van der Strate, H.J., Van De Zande, L. & Bijlsma, R. 2000. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in the moss species Polytrichum formosum. Molec. Ecol. 9: 1678-1680.
49. Van der Velde, M., Van de Zande, L. & Bijlsma, R. 2001b. Genetic structure of Polytrichum formosum in relation to the breeding system as revealed by microsatellites. Evol. Biol. 14: 288-295.
50. Victory, E.R., Glaubitz, J.C., Rhodes, O.E., Jr. & Woeste, K.E. 2006. Genetic homogeneity in Juglans nigra (Juglandaceae) at nuclear microsatellites. Amer. J. Bot. 93: 118-126.
51. Warnstorf, C. 1911. Sphagnales-Sphagnaceae (Sphagnologia universalis). Pflanzenr. (Engler) 51: 1-546.
52. Weissenbach, J., Gyapay, G., Dib, C., Vignal, A., Morisette, J., Millaseau, P., Vaysseix, G. & Lathrop, M. 1992. A second generation linkage map of the human genome. Nature 359: 794-801.
53. Wilson, P.J. & Provan, J. 2003. Effect of habitat fragmentation on levels and patterns of genetic diversity in natural populations of the peat moss Polytrichum commune. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. B., Biol. Sci. 270: 881-886.
54. Zhang, K. & Rosenberg. 2007. On the genealogy of a duplicated microsatellite. Genetics 177: 2109-2122.
55. Zhou, P., Menzel, F. & Shaw, A.J. 2007. Systematics and population genetics of Sphagnum macrophyllum and S. cribrosum (Sphagnaceae). Syst. Bot. 32: 493-503.