Systematics of sphagnum section sphagnum in New Zealand: A microsatellite-based analysis

New Zealand Journal of Botany

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 105-118

  Karlin, E F ^a   Boles, S B ^b   Shaw, A J ^b  

^a RAMAPO COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alloploid; Australia; Microsatellites; Mosses; New Zealand; Peat moss; S. cristatum; S. magellanicum; S. perichaetiale; Sphagnum; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; GAMETOPHYTE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRID; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOTYPE; MOSS; PEAT; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

AUSTRALASIA; NEW ZEALAND;

BRYOPHYTA; SPHAGNUM; SPHAGNUM CRISTATUM; SPHAGNUM MAGELLANICUM; SPHAGNUM PERICHAETIALE;

EID: 49149128719     PISSN: 0028825X     EISSN: 11758643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00288250809509758     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alloway, BV, Lowe, DJ, Barrell, DJA, Newnham, RM, Almond, PC, Augustinus, PC, Berüer, NAN, Carter, L, Litchfield, NJ, McGlone, MS, Shulmeister, J, Vandergoes, MJ, Williams, PW, and NZ-INTIMATE members. 2007. Towards a climate event stratigraphy for New Zealand over the past 30,000 years (NZ-INTIMATE project). Journal of Quaternary Science, 22:9–35.
2. Andrews, AL. 1951. Studies in the Warnstorf Sphagnum herbarium. VI. The subgenus Inophloea in the Eastern Hemisphere. Bryologist, 54:83–91.
3. Andrews, AL. 1958. Notes on North American Sphagnum. X. Review. Bryologist, 61:270–276.
4. Bartlett, JK. 1984. New or interesting records of mosses from New Zealand. National Museum of New Zealand Records, 2:181–189.
5. Beever, J, Allison, KW, and Child, J. 1992. The moss flora of New Zealand., 2nd ed., Dunedin:University of Otago Press.
6. Bryan, VS. 1955. Chromosome studies in the genus Sphagnum. Bryologist, 58:16–39.
7. Butruille, DV, and Boiteux, LS. 2000. Selection-mutation balance in polysomic tetraploids:impact of double reduction and gametophytic selection on the frequency and subchromosomal localization of deleterious mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97:6608–6613.
8. Catcheside, DG. 1980. “ Mosses of South Australia ”. In Handbook of the Flora and Fauna of South Australia, 364South Australia:Government Printer.
9. Cronberg, N. 1996. Isozyme evidence of relationships within Sphagnum sect. Acutifolia (Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 203:41–64.
10. Cronberg, N. 1998. Population structure and interspecific differentiation of the peat moss sister species Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillifolium (Sphagnaceae) in northern Europe. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 209:139–158.
11. Cronberg, N, and Natcheva, R. 2002. Hybridization between the peatmosses, Sphagnum capillifolium and S. quinquefarium (Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta) as inferred by morphological characters and isozyme markers. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 234:53–70.
12. Crum, H. 1984. Sphagnopsida, Sphagnaceae. North America Flora Series II, 11:i–ii. 1–180.
13. Crum, H, and Anderson, LE. 1981. Mosses of eastern North America, 2 vol., New York:Columbia University Press.
14. Daniels, RE, and Eddy, A. 1985. Handbook of European Sphagna, Huntingdon:Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.
15. Dieringer, D, and Schlötterer, C. 2002. Microsatellite analyser (MSA):a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Molecular Ecology Notes, 3(1):167–169.
16. Dixon, HN. 1929. Studies in the bryology of New Zealand with special reference to the herbarium of Robert Brown. Bulletin of the New Zealand Institute, 3(6):299–372.
17. Eddy, A. 1977. Sphagnales of tropical Asia. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), 5:359–445.
18. Excoffier, L, Laval, G, and Schneider, S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0:an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformat-ics Online, 1:47–50.
19. Fife, AJ. 1996. A synopsis of New Zealand Sphagna, with a description of S. simplex sp. nov. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 34:309–328.
20. Flatberg, KI. 1994. Norwegian Sphagna. A field colour guide. University Trondheim, Vitenskapsmuseet Rapport Botanisk Serie 1994, 3:1–42.
21. Fritsch, R. 1991. Index to plant chromosome counts— Bryophyta, The Hague & Boston:Scheltema and Holkema.
22. Greilhuber, J, Dolezel, J, Lysak, MA, and Bennett, MD. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany, 95:255–260.
23. Holmen, K. 1955. Sphagnum chromosome numbers. Botanisk Tidsskrift, 52:37–42.
24. Isoviita, P. 1966. Studies on Sphagnum. I. Nomenclatural revision of the European taxa. Annales Botanici Fennici, 3:199–264.
25. Karlin, EF, and Andrus, RE. 2006. Update on Sphagnum per-ichaetiale in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 44:421–424.
26. Karlin, EF, Boles, SB, and Shaw, AJ. in press. Resolving boundaries between species in Sphagnum section Subsecunda using microsatellite markers. Taxon
27. Lane, DM. 1978. Chemical test for red-pigmented sections of Sphagnum:survey of 17 North American species. Bryologist, 81:602–695.
28. Maass, WSG, and Harvey, MJ. 1973. Studies on the taxonomy and distribution of Sphagnum VII. Chromosome numbers in Sphagnum. Nova Hedwigia, 24:193–205.
29. McGlone, MS. 1985. Plant biogeography and the late Cenozoic history of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 23:723–749.
30. McQueen, CB, and Andrus, RE. 2007. “ Sphagnaceae ”. In Flora of North America Editorial Committee ed. 1993+. Flora of North America north of Mexico Vol. 27, 45–101. New York and Oxford 12+ vol.
31. Peakall, R, and Smouse, PE. 2006. GENALEX 6:genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6:288–295.
32. Roose, ML, and Gottlieb, LD. 1976. Genetic and biochemical consequences of polyploidy in Tragopogon. Evolution, 30:818–830.
33. Sainsbury, GOK. 1955. A handbook of New Zealand mosses. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 5:1–490.
34. Såstad, SM, Flatberg, KI, and Cronberg, N. 1999. Electropho-retic evidence supporting a theory of allpolyploid origin of the peatmoss Sphagnum jensenii. Nordic Journal of Botany, 19:355–362.
35. Såstad, SM, Flatberg, KI, and Hanssen, L. 2000. Origin, taxonomy and population structure of the allopolyploid peat moss Sphagnum majus. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 225:73–84.
36. Såstad, SM, Stenøien, HK, Flatberg, KI, and Bakken, S. 2001. The narrow endemic Sphagnum troendelagicum is an allopolyploid derivative of the widespread S. balticum and S. tenellum. Systematic Botany, 26:66–74.
37. Scott, GAM, Stone, IG, and Rosser, C. 1976. The mosses of Southern Australia, 495London:Academic Press.
38. Seppelt, RD. 2006. Sphagnaceae. Flora of Australia, 51:89–104.
39. Shaw, AJ. 2000. Phylogeny of the Sphagnopsida based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Bryolo-gist, 103:277–306.
40. Shaw, AJ, and Goffinet, B. 2000. Molecular evidence of reticulate evolution in the peatmosses (Sphagnum), including S. ehyalinum sp. nov. Bryologist, 103:357–374.
41. Shaw, AJ, Cox, CJ, and Boles, SB. 2003. Polarity of peatmoss (Sphagnum) evolution:who says mosses have no roots?. American Journal of Botany, 90:1777–1787.
42. Shaw, AJ, Cao, T, Wang, LS, Fiatberg, KI, Fiatberg, B, Shaw, B, Zhou, P, Boles, S, and Terracciano, S. 2008. Genetic variation in three Chinese peat mosses (Sphagnum) based on microsatellite markers, with primer information and analysis of ascertainment bias. Bryologist, 111:271–281.
43. Temsch, EM, Greilhuber, J, and Krisai, R. 1998. Genome size in Sphagnum (peat moss). Botanica Acta, 111:325–330.
44. Wardle, P. 2002. Vegetation of New Zealand, 672Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
45. Warnstorf, C. 1911. Sphagnales-Sphagnaceae(Sphagnolo-giauniversalis). In:Engler A ed. Das Pflanzenreich. Regni Vegetabilis Conspectus, 51:1–546.
46. Willis, JH. 1953. Systematic notes on Victorian mosses—2. Victorian Naturalist, 70:55–57.