Species delimitation and relationships of the Sphagnum recurvum complex (Bryophyta) - As revealed by isozyme and RAPD markers

Systematic Botany

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 95-107

  Såstad, Sigurd M ^a   StenØien, Hans Kristen ^a   Flatberg, Kjell I ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPHAGNUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM; SPHAGNUM BALTICUM; SPHAGNUM BREVIFOLIUM; SPHAGNUM FALLAX; SPHAGNUM FLEXUOSUM; SPHAGNUM ISOVIITAE; SPHAGNUM LINDBERGII; SPHAGNUM RECURVUM;

EID: 0344348833     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419389     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BOISSELIER-DUBAYLE, M. C. and H. BISCHLER. 1994. A combination of molecular and morphological characters for delimitation of taxa in European Porella. Journal of Bryology 18: 1-11.
2. _, M. F. JUBIER, B. LEJEUNE, and H. BISCHLER. 1995. Genetic variability in the three subspecies of Marchantia polymorpha (Hepaticae): Isozymes, RFLP and RAPD markers. Taxon 44: 363-376.
3. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L. and A. W. F. EDWARDS. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21: 550-570.
4. CRAWFORD, D. J. 1989. Enzyme electrophoresis and plant systematics. Pp. 146-164 in Isozymes in plant biology, eds. D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis. Portland: Dioscorides.
5. CRONBERG, N. 1989. Patterns of variation in morphological characters and isoenzymes in populations of Sphagnum capillifolium (Ehrh.) Hedw. and S. rubellum Wils. from two bogs in southern Sweden. Journal of Bryology 15: 683-696.
6. _. 1995. Isozyme electrophoresis of Sphagnum: an analysis of methodology. Lindbergia 20: 40-48.
7. _. 1996. Isozyme evidence of relationships within Sphagnum sect. Acutifolia (Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta). Plant Systematics and Evolution 203: 41-64.
8. _. 1997. Genotypic differentiation between the two related peat mosses, Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillifolium in northern Europe. Journal of Bryology 19: 715-729.
9. _. 1998. Population structure and interspecific differentiation of the peat moss sister species, Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillifolium (Sphagnaceae) in northern Europe. Plant Systematics and Evolution 209: 139-158.
10. CRUM, H. 1984. Sphagnopsida, Sphagnaceae. North American Flora, series II, part 11, pp. 1-180.
11. _. 1997. A seasoned view of North American Sphagna. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 82: 77-98.
12. DANIELS, R. E. and A. EDDY. 1990. Handbook of European Sphagna. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon.
13. DAVIS, J. I. and P. S. MANOS. 1991. Isozyme variation and species delimitation in the Puccinella nutalliana complex (Poaceae): an application of the phylogenetic species concept. Systematic Botany 16: 431-445.
14. _ and K. C. NIXON. 1992. Genetic variation, populations, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systematic biology 41: 421-435.
15. DOWLINC, T. E., C. MORITZ, J. D. PALMER, and L. H. RIESEBERG. 1996. Nucleic acids III: Analysis of fragments and restriction sites. Pp. 407-514 in Molecular Systematics, second edition, eds. D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz and B. K. Mable. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
16. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
17. EWENS, W. J. 1972. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoretical Population Biology. 3: 87-112.
18. FARRIS, J. S. 1981. Distance data in phylogenetic analysis. Pp. 3-23 in Advances in cladistics: Proceedings of the first meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, eds. V. A. Funk and D. R. Brooks. New York: The New York Botanical garden.
19. _. 1985. Distances and statistics. Cladistics 2: 144-157.
20. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125: 1-15.
21. FLATBERG, K. I. 1989. Sphagnum (Cuspidata) pacificum sp. nov. The Bryologist 92: 116-119.
22. _. 1992. The European taxa in the Sphagnum recurvum complex. 1. Sphagnum isoviitae sp. nov. Journal of Bryology 17: 1-13.
23. _. 1993. The European taxa in the Sphagnum recurvum complex. 2. Amended descriptions of Sphagnum brevifolium and S. fallax. Lindbergia 17: 96-110.
24. FRITSCH, R. 1991. Index to bryophyte chromosome counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 40: 1-352.
25. GOTTLIEB, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Progress in Phytochemistry 7: 1-46.
26. HILL, M. O. 1978. Sphagnopsida. Pp. 30-76 in The moss flora of Britain and Ireland, ed. A. J. E. Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. HILLIS, D. M. 1984. Misuse and modifications of Nei's genetic distance. Systematic Zoology 33: 238-240.
28. ISOVIITA, P. 1966. Studies on Sphagnum L. I. Nomenclatural revision of the European taxa. Annales Botanici Fennici 3: 199-264.
29. KRZAKOWA, M. 1996. Review of genetic investigations on bryophytes in Poland. Cryptogamie, Bryologie, Lichenologie 17: 237-243.
30. MANTEL, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209-220.
31. MCQUEEN, C. B. 1989. A biosystematic study of Sphagnum capillifolium sensu lato. The Bryologist 92: 1-24.
32. MITTON, J. B., Y. B. LINHART, K. B. STURGEON and J. L. HAMRICK. 1979. Allozyme polymorphisms detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pine. Journal of Heredity 70: 86-89.
33. NEI, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283-292.
34. PAGE, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12: 357-358.
35. ROHLF, F. J. 1997. NTSYSpc, numerical taxonomy and multi-variate analysis system, version 2.00. New York: Exeter Software.
36. _ and R. R. SOKAL. 1981. Comparing numerical taxonomic studies. Systematic Zoology 30: 459-490.
37. SÅSTAD, S. M. In press. Genetic and environmental sources of variation in leaf morphology of Sphagnum fallax and S. isoviitae (Bryopsida): comparison of experiments conducted in the field and laboratory. Canadian Journal of Botany.
38. _ and K. I. FLATBERG. 1994. Leaf size and shape in the Sphagnum recurvum complex: taxonomic significance and habitat variation. Journal of Bryology 18: 261-275.
39. SLATKIN, M. 1994. An exact test of neutrality based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genetic Research 64: 71-74.
40. STENØIEN, H., S. BAKKEN, and K. I. FLATBERG. 1997. Phenotypic variation in the Sphagnum recurvum complex: A cultivation experiment. Journal of Bryology 19: 733-752.
41. _ and S. M. SÅSTAD. In press. Genetic structure in three haploid peat mosses (Sphagnum). Heredity.
42. STONEBURNER, A., R. WYATT, and I. J. ODRZYKOSKI. 1991. Application of enzyme electrophoresis to bryophyte systematics and population biology. Advances in Bryology 4: 1-27.
43. SWOFFORD, D. L. and S. H. BERLOCHER. 1987. Inferring evolutionary trees from gene frequency data under the principle of maximum parsimony. Systematic Zoology 36: 293-325.
44. _ and G. J. OLSEN. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pp. 411-501 in Molecular systematics, eds. D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer associates.
45. _, _, P. J. WADDELL, and D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407-514 in Molecular systematics, second edition, eds. D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz and B. K. Mable. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
46. WATTERSON, G. 1978. The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics 88: 405-417.
47. WENDEL, J. F. and N. F. WEEDEN. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. Pp. 5-45 in Isozymes in plant biology, eds. D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis. Portland: Dioscorides.
48. WESTERMEIER, R. 1993. Electrophoresis in Practice. VCH: Weinheim.