Do 'liberal market economies' really innovate more radically than 'coordinated market economies'?. Hall and Soskice reconsidered

Research Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 181-191

  Akkermans, Dirk ^a   Castaldi, Carolina ^b   Los, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Patent citations; Technological specialization; Varieties of capitalism

Indexed keywords

HELIUM; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INNOVATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MARKETING; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES; EMPIRICAL TESTS; MARKET ECONOMIES; PATENT CITATIONS; RADICAL INNOVATIONS; TAYLOR'S ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS; TECHNOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATION; VARIETIES OF CAPITALISM;

ECONOMICS;

EID: 57749192693     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. (2002), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
2. Aguilera R.V., and Dencker J.C. The role of human resource management in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. International Journal of Human Resource Management 15 (2004) 1355-1370
3. Akkermans D.H.M. National institutions and innovative performance: the 'Varieties of Capitalism' approach empirically tested. Paper prepared for the 21st EGOS Colloquium. Berlin, June 30-July 2 (2005)
4. Albert M. Capitalism Versus Capitalism: How America's Obsession with Individual Achievement and Short-term Profit has Led it to the Brink of Collapse (1993), Four Walls Eight Windows, New York
5. Albert M.B., Avery D., Narin F., and McAllister P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy 20 (1991) 251-259
6. Archibugi D., and Pianta M. Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: the analysis of patent data. Research Policy 21 (1992) 79-93
7. Asheim B.T., and Coenen L. Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: on knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (2006) 163-173
8. Audretsch D.B., and Feldman M.P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86 (1996) 630-640
9. Bhapkar V.P. On the analysis of contingency tables with a quantitative response. Biometrics 24 (1968) 329-338
10. Breschi S. The geography of innovation: a cross-sector analysis. Regional Studies 34 (2000) 213-229
11. Caniëls M. Knowledge Spillovers and Economic Growth (2000), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
12. Casper S., and Kettler H. National institutional frameworks and the hybridization of entrepreneurial business models: the German and UK biotechnology sectors. Industry and Innovation 8 (2001) 5-30
13. Castaldi, C., Los, B., 2008. The Identification of Important Innovations Using Tail Estimators, Innovation Studies Utrecht working paper 08-07. University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
14. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2000. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not), NBER Working Paper 7552. NBER, Cambridge, MA.
15. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 11 (1982) 147-162
16. Griffiths A., and Zammuto R.F. Institutional governance systems and variations in national competitive advantage: an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review 30 (2005) 823-842
17. Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (1990) 1661-1707
18. Hall B.H., Jaffe A.B., and Trajtenberg M. The NBER Patent-Citations Data File: lessons, insights, and methodological tools. In: Jaffe A.B., and Trajtenberg M. (Eds). Patents, Citations & Innovations (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 403-459
19. Hall P.A., and Soskice D. An Introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall P.A., and Soskice D. (Eds). Varieties of Capitalism; The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1-68
20. Hancke B., and Rhodes M. EMU and labor market institutions in Europe: the rise and fall of national social pacts. Work and Occupations 32 (2005) 196-228
21. Hirabayashi, J., 2003. Revisiting the USPTO Concordance between the U.S. Patent Classification and the Standard Industrial Classification Systems. Paper presented at the WIPO-OECD Workshop on Statistics in the Patent Field. Geneva, 18-19 September. http://www.wipo.int/patent/meetings/2003/statistics_workshop/en/presentation/statistics_workshop_hirabayashi.pdf.
22. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., and Fogarty M.S. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 90 (2000) 215-218
23. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., and Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidence by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1993) 577-598
24. Jung S., and Imm K.-Y. The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: a comparative case study of patent statistics. World Patent Information 24 (2002) 303-311
25. Kenworthy L. Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance. Socio-Economic Review 4 (2006) 69-91
26. Kitson M. The American economic model and European economic policy. Regional Studies 39 (2005) 987-1001
27. Klepper S. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review 86 (1996) 562-583
28. Lerner J. The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1994) 319-333
29. Maurseth P.-B., and Verspagen B. Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104 (2002) 531-545
30. Michel J., and Bettels B. Patent citation analysis: a closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics 51 (2001) 185-201
31. Piergiovanni R., and Santarelli E. Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing. Regional Studies 35 (2001) 697-702
32. Scherer F.M., Harhoff D., and Kukies J. Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10 (2000) 175-200
33. Schumpeter J.A. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942), Harper, New York
34. Shane S. Technological opportunity and new firm creation. Management Science 47 (2001) 205-220
35. Silverberg G., and Verspagen B. The size distribution of innovations revisited: an application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance. Journal of Econometrics 19 (2007) 318-339
36. Taylor M.Z. Empirical evidence against varieties of capitalism's theory of technological innovation. International Organization 58 (2004) 601-631
37. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 20 (1990) 172-187
38. Trajtenberg M., Henderson R., and Jaffe A.B. University vs. corporate patents: a window on the basicness of innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5 (1997) 19-50
39. Utterback J.M., and Abernathy W.J. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. OMEGA 3 (1975) 639-656
40. Verspagen B., and de Loo I. Technology spillovers between sectors and over time. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 60 (1999) 215-235