Empirical evidence against varieties of capitalism's theory of technological innovation

International Organization

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Taylor, Mark Zachary ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247651926     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020818304583066     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Archibugi, Daniel, and Mario Pianta. 1996. Measuring Technological Change Through Patents and Innovation Surveys. Technovation 16 (9):451-68.
2. Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, edited by Richard R. Nelson, 609-26. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
3. Bauer, Martin, ed. 1995. Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Beasley, David. 1988. The Suppression of the Automobile: Skulduggery at the Crossroads. New York: Greenwood Press.
5. Bimber, Bruce. 1994. Three Faces of Technological Determinism. In Does Technology Drive History: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, edited by Merrit Roe Smith and Leo Marx, 79-100. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Bourke, Paul, and Linda Butler. 1996. Publication Types, Citation Rates, and Evaluation. Scientometrics 37 (3):473-94.
7. Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. 1999. International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement. International Economic Review 40 (3):537-70.
8. Edquist, Charles, ed. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. New York: Pinter.
9. Edwards, Paul N. 1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
10. Garfield, Eugene. 1979. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Glanzel, Wolfgang, and Henk F. Moed. 2002. Journal Impact Measures in Bibiliometric Research. Scientometrics 53 (2):171-93.
12. Griliches, Zvi, ed. 1984. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. _. 1990. Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4):1661-707.
14. Griliches, Zvi, Bronwyn H. Hall, and Ariel Pakes. 1987. The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity. In Economic Policy and Technological Performance, edited by Partha Dasgupta and Paul Stoneman, 68-103. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2000. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. Working Paper 7741. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
16. _. 2001. The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. Working Paper 8498. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17. Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. Introduction. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, 1-68. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Harhoff, Dietmar, Francis Narin, F. M. Scherer, and Katrin Vopel. 1999. Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventories. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3):511-15.
19. Helpman, Elhanan. 1984. Increasing Returns, Imperfect Markets, and Trade Theory. In Handbook of International Economics, edited by Ronald Jones and Peter Kenen, 325-65. Amsterdam: North Holland.
20. Hicks, Dana. 1999. The Difficulty of Achieving Full Coverage of International Social Science Literature and the Bibliometric Consequences. Scientometrics 44 (2):193-215.
21. Jaffe, Adam B., Manuel Trajtenberg, and Michael Fogarty. 2000. The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report of the NBER/Case Western Reserve Survey of Patentees. Working Paper 7631. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22. Krugman, Paul, ed. 1986. Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
23. _. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
24. Lanjouw, Jean O., and Mark Schankerman. 1997. Stylized Facts of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope, and Ownership. Working Paper 6297. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25. _. 1999. The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. Working Paper 7345. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
26. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake, ed. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
27. McMillan, G. Steven, and Robert D. Hamilton. 2000. Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: An Analysis of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12 (4):465-75.
28. Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Mowery, David C., and Nathan Rosenberg. 1979. The Influence of Market Demand Upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies. Research Policy 8 (2): 102-53.
30. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2001. The NBER U.S. Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. Available at (www.nber.org/patents). Accessed on 24 March 2004.
31. National Science Board. 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators-2002. Washington, D.C.: National Science Board.
32. Nelson, Richard R., ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Pakes, Ariel. 1986. Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks. Econometrica 54 (4):755-84.
34. Romer, Paul M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5):S71-102.
35. Rosenberg, Nathan, and L. E. Birdzell, Jr. 1986. How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. New York: Basic Books.
36. Samuels, Richard J. 1994. "Rich Nation, Strong Army": National Security and the Technological Transformation of Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
37. Saxenian, Anna-Lee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
38. Scherer, Frederic M. 1965. Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Innovations. American Economic Review 55 (5):1097-125.
39. Schmookler, Jacob. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
40. Solow, Robert M. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (3):312-20.
41. Trajtenberg, Manuel. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1):172-87.
42. Tyson, Laura D'Andrea. 1993. Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflicts in High-Technology Industries. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
43. Utterback, James M. 1994. Mastering The Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
44. Williamson, Oliver. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
45. _ 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.