Outperforming the competition in multi-unit sealed bid auctions

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 702-709

  Vetsikas, Ioannis A ^a   Jennings, Nicholas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bidding strategies; Equilibrium analysis; Game theory; Revenue; Simulation

Indexed keywords

AUCTION SETTINGS; BIDDING AGENTS; BIDDING STRATEGIES; EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; MULTI UNITS; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; PRICE AUCTIONS; REVENUE; SEALED-BID AUCTIONS; SIMULATION;

COMMERCE; COMPETITION; FUZZY CLUSTERING; GAME THEORY;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 57749189073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1329125.1329252     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. S. Brainov. The role and the impact of preferences on multiagent interaction. In ATAL'99, pages 349-363, 1999.
2. F. Brandt, T. Sandholm, and Y. Shoham. Spiteful bidding in sealed-bid auctions. In IJCAI-07, pages 1207-1214, 2007.
3. V. Krishna. Auction theory. Academic Press, 2002.
4. D. K. Levine. Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1:598-622, 1998.
5. E. Maasland and S. Onderstal. Auctions with financial externalities. Working paper, 2003.
6. A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, 1995.
7. J. Morgan, K. Steiglitz, and G. Reis. The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy: Vol. 2(1), 2003.
8. J. A. Rice. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Duxbury Press, California, 1995.
9. J. Sobel. Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Literature: Vol. XLIII, pages 392-436, June 2005.
10. I. A. Vetsikas, N. R. Jennings, and B. Selman. Generating Bayes-Nash equilibria to design autonomous trading agents. In IJCAI-07, pages 1543-1550, 2007.