Challenging institutional barriers to community-based research

Action Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 49-67

  Stoecker, Randy ^a  

^a Department of Rural Sociology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

community engagement; community based research; community university partnerships; sociology

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749143867     PISSN: 14767503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1476750307083721     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brydon-Miller, M., & Greenwood, D. (2006). A re-examination of the relationship between action research and human subjects review processes. Action Research, 4, 117—128.
2. Campus Compact. (2005). Campus Compact annual membership survey — 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.compact.org/about/statistics/2005
3. Champion, L., & Keaton, A. (2005). Service learning: A brief guide for faculty in the college of arts and sciences. Office of Academic Outreach. University of Tennessee. Retrieved from: http://www.artsci.utk.edu/outreach/pdfs/ServiceLearningGuide.8—2005.pdf
4. Corporation for National and Community Service. (2006). Learn and serve America grant provisions. Retrieved from: http://www.learnandserve.gov/pdf/highered_prov_06.pdf
5. Corporation for National and Community Service. (2007). What is service learning? Retrieved from: http://www.learnandserve.gov/about/service_learning/index.asp
6. Cox, L.E., Rouff, J.R., Svendsen, K.H., Markowitz, M., & Abrams, D.I. (1998). Community advisory boards: Their role in aids clinical trials. Health & Social Work, 23(4), 290—297.
7. Cutforth, N.J., & Stocking, V.B. (2005). Managing the challenges of teaching community-based research courses. Paper presented at the 5th Annual International Service Learning Research Conference, Michigan State University.
8. Eby, J.W. (1998). Why service-learning is bad. Retrieved from: http://www.messiah.edu/agape/pdf%20files/wrongsvc.pdf
9. Eyler, J., & Giles, D. (1999). Where's the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Gaventa, J. (1993). The powerful, the powerless, and the experts: Knowledge struggles in an information age. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 21—40). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
12. Gedicks, A. (1996). Activist sociology: Personal reflections. Sociological Imagination, 33. Retrieved from: http://comm-org.wisc.edu/si/sihome.htm
13. Goldman, C.A., Williams, T., Adamson, D., & Rosenblatt, K. (2000). Paying for university research facilities and administration. Arlington, VA: Rand Corporation.
14. Government of Canada. (2005). TCPS: Section 6. Research involving Aboriginal peoples. Retrieved from: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/policystatement/section6.cfm
15. Hikmet, N., & Chen, S.K. (2003). An investigation into low mail survey response rates of information technology users in health care organizations. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 72, 29—34.
16. Hoge, P. (2006). Hundreds attend mass pillow fight. San Francisco Chronicle, 14 February, B-1.
17. Hopper, D.I. (2001). Activists use computers in protests. Washington Post, 19 January. Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010119/aponline023217_000.htm
18. Jones, S.R. (2003). Principles and profiles of exemplary partnerships with community agencies. In B. Jacoby & Associates (Eds.), Building partnerships for service learning (pp. 151—173). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. (1997). KSDPP code of research ethics. Kahnawake Mohawk Territory: Kateri Memorial Hospital Center. Retrieved from: http://www.ksdpp.org/code.html
20. McDonald, D.A., Peterson, D.J., & Betts, S.C. (2005). More tips: What if a cooperative extension professional must work with Native American institutional review boards? Journal of Extension, 43. Retrieved from: http://www.joe.org/joe/2005october/tt1.shtml
21. McMaster University Office of Research. (2001). Student SREC & terms of reference. Retrieved from: http://www.mcmaster.ca/ors/ethics/info_srec_sbsrec.htm
22. Nason, J.D. (1997). Tribal models for controlling research. Native research & scholarship symposium papers. Tribal College Journal. Retrieved from: http://www.fdl.cc.mn.us/tcj/summer97/NASON.html
23. Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Potvin, L., Paradis, G., Macaulay, A.C., & Delormier, T. (1998). Participatory research with native community of Kahnawake creates innovative code of research ethics. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 89(2), 105—108.
25. Rahman, M.A. (1991). The theoretical standpoint of PAR. In O. Fals-Borda & M. A. Rahman (Eds.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research (pp. 13—23). New York: Apex Press.
26. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs. New York: Perseus.
27. Robinson, T. (2000a). Service-learning as justice advocacy: Can political scientists do politics? Political Science and Politics, 33, 605—612.
28. Robinson, T. (2000b). Dare the school build a new social order? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 142—157.
29. Sandy, M., & Holland, B. (2006). Different worlds and common ground: Community partner perspectives on campus—community partnerships. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(1), 30—43.
30. Scheibel, J., Bowley, E., & Jones, S. (2005). The promise of partnerships: Tapping into the college as a community asset. Providence, RI: Campus Compact, Brown University.
31. Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary first nations research and some options for first nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, January, 80—95. Retrieved from: http://www.naho.ca/english/naho_journal.php
32. Sharp, R.R., & Foster, M.W. (2002). Community involvement in the ethical review of genetic research: Lessons from American Indian and Alaska native populations. Environmental Health Perspectives, Supplement 2: Community, research, and environmental justice, 110, 145—148.
33. Sheehan, K. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Retrieved from: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html
34. Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.
35. Social Science and Humanities Research Council. (2006). Community university research alliances. Retrieved from: http://www.sshrc.ca/web/apply/program_descriptions/cura_e.asp
36. Stoecker, R. (1999). Making connections: Community organizing, empowerment planning, and participatory research in participatory evaluation. Sociological Practice, 1, 209—232.
37. Stoecker, R. (2005). Research methods for community change: A project-based approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Stoecker, R. (2007). Community organizations and service learning. Retrieved from: http://comm-org.wisc.edu/sl
39. Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Community-based research in higher education: Methods, models and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40. Trent University. (n.d.). Research ethics: Research involving human subjects. Trent University Research Ethics Board (REB) Protocol. Retrieved from: http://www.trentu.ca/research/docs/pdf/researchethicsprotocol.pdf
41. University of Central Florida. (n.d.). Service learning: Community partners. Retrieved from: http://www.servicelearning.ucf.edu/index.cfm? fuseaction=agency.main
42. Wallace, J. (2000). The problem of time: Enabling students to make long-term commitments to community-based learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 133—142.
43. Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2000). Community-centered service learning. The American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 767—780.