The tolerance range of binocular disparity on a 3D display based on the physiological characteristics of ocular accommodation

Displays

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 44-48

  Iwasaki, Tsuneto ^a   Kubota, Toshiaki ^a   Tawara, Akihiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

3D display; Accommodation; Horizontal binocular disparity; Stereoscopic image

Indexed keywords

BINOCULARS; FLUORESCENT SCREENS; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

3D DISPLAY; ACCOMMODATION; HORIZONTAL BINOCULAR DISPARITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE; TOLERANCE RANGES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 57749102446     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2008.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Iwasaki T., Akiya S., Inoue T., and Noro K. Surmised state of accommodation to stereoscopic three-dimensional images with binocular disparity. Ergonomics 39 11 (1996) 1268-1272
2. Nagata S. The binocular fusion of human vision on stereoscopic display field of view and environment effects. Ergonomics 39 11 (1996) 1273-1284
3. Ukai K., and Kato Y. The use of video refraction to measure the dynamic properties of the near triad in observers of a 3-D display. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 22 5 (2002) 385-388
4. Emoto M., Niida T., and Okano F. Repeated vergence adaptation causes the decline of visual functions in watching stereoscopic television. Journal of Display Technology 1 2 (2005) 328-340
5. Kooi F.L., and Toet A. Visual comfort of binocular and 3D display. Displays 25 (2004) 99-108
6. Inoue T., and Ohzu H. Accommodative responses to stereoscopic three-dimensional display. Applied Optics 36 (1997) 4509-4515
7. Toates F.M. Accommodation function of the human eye. Physiological Reviews 52 4 (1972) 828-863
8. Daum K.M. Accommodative response. In: Eskridge J.B., Amos J., and Bartlett J.D. (Eds). Clinical Procedures in Optometry (1991), JB Lippincott, Philadelphia 677-687
9. Schaeffel F., Wilhelm H., and Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. Journal of Physiology 461 (1993) 301-320
10. Schor C. The influence of interaction between accommodation and convergence of the lag of accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 19 2 (1999) 134-150
11. Charman W.N. Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 19 2 (1999) 126-133
12. He J.C., Burns S.A., and Marcos S. Monochromatic aberrations in the accommodated human eye. Vision Research 40 1 (2000) 41-48
13. Hazel C.A., Cox M.J., and Strang N.C. Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus response function in myopic subjects. Optometry and Vision Science 80 2 (2003) 151-158
14. Kasthurirangan S., Vilupuru A.S., and Glasser A. Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Research 43 27 (2003) 2945-2956
15. Doo A.G., Doo P.C., and Doo F.L. Evaluating relative accommodations in general binocular dysfunction. Optometry and Vision Science 79 12 (2002) 779-787
16. Seaber J.H. Pseudomyopia in exodeviations. American Orthoptic Journal 16 (1966) 67-72
17. Subbaram M.V., and Bullimore M.A. Visual acuity and the accuracy of the accommodative response. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 22 4 (2002) 312-318