Performance of bone cements: Are current preclinical specifications adequate?

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 826-831

  Nottrott, Markus ^a,b   Mølster, Anders O ^a,b   Moldestad, Irene O ^a   Walsh, William R ^c   Gjerdet, Nils R ^a,b  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

AGING; AIR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; IMPLANT; MATERIALS TESTING; MOISTURE; STANDARD; STANDARDIZATION; STORAGE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPERATURE; VALIDITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

BONE CEMENTS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 57749084437     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17453670810016920     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akashi A, Matsuya Y, Unemori M, Akamine A. The relationship between water absorption characteristics and the mechanical strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in long-term water storage. Biomaterials 1999; 20 (17): 1573-8.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard specification for acrylic bone cement (ASTM F451-99a). 1999.
3. Arnold J C, Venditti N P. Effects of environment on the creep properties of a poly(ethylmethacrylate) based bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001; 12 (8): 707-17.
4. Baleani M, Cristofolini L, Toni A. Temperature and ageing condition effects on the characterization of acrylic bone cement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2001; 215 (1): 113-8.
5. Carlsson Å S. Comparison of different bone cements: An overview. In: Bimaterials in Surgery (Ed. Walenkamp G H I M). Georg Thieme Verlag. Stuttgart, New York 1998: 43-7.
6. Deb S, Braden M, Bonfield W. Water absorption characteristics of modified hydroxyapatite bone cements. Biomaterials 1995; 16 (14): 1095-100.
7. Demian H W, McDermott K. Regulatory perspective on characterization and testing of orthopedic bone cements. Biomaterials 1998; 19 1607-18.
8. Dunne N J, Orr J F. Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2001; 22 (13): 1819-26.
9. Espehaug B, Fumes O, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E. The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84 (6): 832-8.
10. Furnes O, Lie S A, Havelin L I, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B. Exeter and charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68 (6): 515-20.
11. Furnes O, Havelin L I, Espehaug B, Steindal K, Sørås T E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, REPORT 2007. Helse-Bergen HF, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, http://www.haukeland.no/ nrl/, Bergen, Norway 2007.
12. Gruen T A, McNeice G M, Amstutz H C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979; (141): 17-27.
13. Hailey J L, Turner I G, Miles A W, Price G. The Effect of Post-Curing Chemical Changes on the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 1994; 5 (9-10): 617-21.
14. Havelin L I, Espehaug B, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B, Langeland N. The Norwegian arthroplasty register. A survey of 17,444 hip replacements 1987-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64 (3): 245-51.
15. Hay J N. The physical ageing of amorphous and crystalline polymers. Pure & Appl Chem 1995; 67 (11): 1855-8.
16. Howell J R, Jr., Blunt L A, Doyle C, Hooper R M, Lee A J, Ling R S. In vivo surface wear mechanisms of femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties: the influence of wear mechanism on clinical outcome. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (1): 88-101.
17. ISO. International standard ISO 5833 Implants for surgery. Acrylic resin cements, 2002.
18. Kuehn K-D. Bone cements. Up-to-date comparison of physical and mechanical properties of commercial materials. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg 2000.
19. Kühn K-D. Properties of bone cement: What is bone cement. In: The well-cemented total hip arthroplasty. Theory and practice (Ed. Breusch S, Malchau H). Springer Medizin Verlag. Berlin 2005: 52-9.
20. Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2006. Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, www.jru.orthop.gu.se, Gothenburg, Sweden 2007.
21. Lewis G. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: state-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res 2003; 66B (1): 457-86.
22. Lewis G, Austin G E. Mechanical properties of vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement. J Appl Biomater 1994; 5 (4): 307-14.
23. Lewis G, Nyman J S. Toward standardization of methods of determination of fracture properties of acrylic bone cement and statistical analysis of test results. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53 (6): 748-68.
24. Lewis G, Janna S, Bhattaram A. Influence of the method of blending an antibiotic powder with an acrylic bone cement powder on physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the cured cement. Biomaterials 2005; 26 (20): 4317-25.
25. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Söderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 2) 2002; 84: 2-20.
26. Malchau H, Garellick G, Eisler T, Kärrholm J, Herberts P. Presidential guest address: the Swedish Hip Registry: increasing the sensitivity by patient outcome data. Clin Orthop 2005; 441: 19-29.
27. Nilsen A R, Wiig M. Total hip arthroplasty with Boneloc(R). Loosening in 102/157 cases after 0.5-3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67 (1): 57-9.
28. Nottrott M, Mølster A O, Gjerdet N R. Time dependent mechanical properties of bone cement. An in vitro study over one year. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 83B (2): 416-21.
29. Perez M A, Garcia-Aznar J M, Doblare M, Seral B, Seral F. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants. Med Eng Phys 2006; 28 (6): 525-33.
30. Ruyter I E, Svendsen S A. Flexural properties of denture base polymers. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43 (1): 95-104.
31. Schmitt S, Krzypow D J, Rimmac C M. The effect of moisture absoption on the fatigue crack propagation resistance of acrylic bone cement. Biomed Tech 2004; 49 (3): 61-5.
32. Smailys A, Tarasevicius S, Kesteris U, Kalesinskas R J, Wingstrand H. Exeter total hip arthroplasty with matte or polished stems. Medicina (Kaunas) 2007; 43 (3): 215-20.
33. Struik L C E. Physical aging in amorphous polymers and other materials. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam 1978.
34. Thanner J, Freij-Larsson C, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Wesslen B. Evaluation of Boneloc. Chemical and mechanical properties, and a randomized clinical study of 30 total hip arthrolasties. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (3): 207-14.
35. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Matsuya S, Akashi A, Akamine A. Water absorption of poly(methyl methacrylate) containing 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic anhydride. Biomaterials 2003; 24 (8): 1381-7.